Three
ways to the future?
"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
-George Santayana
The final goal of capitalism is clear: concentration of capital leads to a
caste of "chosen by God" loafers, with unlimited possibilities, who
use all others only as work horses. But the enormous quantity of what the rich,
the people who run the mill, see as "unnecessary" people demands
expensive social conditions, creates environmental problems, and even traffic
jams.
But it is also socially highly
explosive. So how do they get rid of humans whom they see as a waste, since
machines have totally replaced them? Male sterilization? Step-by-step
degeneration through unhealthy genetically modified food sold to the people via
powerful advertising? Entrapment in local wars? Or Hitler-style death camps?
But can
it make sense for mankind to reject capitalism and money as a source of fraud,
to claim that it is only a case of false superiority and oppression of one
biological individual by another after the example of "communist' Pol Pot
in Cambodia? A six-time convicted criminal ,
Joseph Dzhugashvili (Stalin) had right away understood what possibilities the
MONOPOLY of a " religion for the sheep" called "communism' opens
for the Power maniacs: "The Great Helmsman" Mao, "The Master of
the House" Stalin; enthusiasm in spite of eternal poverty and millions of
victims deemed "enemies of the People" by "Communist tin
gods" - emperors who were presumed to be the guardian angels of people's
needs and desires? Or was it illusions?
"When war is declared in palaces, it will get to the huts a bit
later."
- E. Sevrus
Whose egoism is humane?
The common man will remain an abandoned and defenseless orphan under the
uncontrollable domination of ANY caste of "god-like" rulers: whether
they call themselves capitalists or communists. As long as the interests of the
voter, namely some effect resulting from his or her political vote, are not secured through the strongest
motivation in the competition for survival, through a political system with
several independent parties, indifferent and self-serving parties will instead
compete for the sympathies of the voters within the limits of the
monopolistic government. And the voters will continue to be ignored.
However, independent parties in any coalition government can gain the sympathy
of voters through honest work done on their behalf without deceptive promises
and false pre-election advertising. Only
under this condition, can political parties not rule, but actually work for the
people.
That is why in the political coup of 1991 the deceived and pauperized Russian
people turned away from the communist "Fathers of the Nation", who
had severed the "umbilical cord" of voter feedback. The dinner party
called 'The Victory of Communism' had turned out inevitably to be only for the
elite, the ones who called themselves the "unselfish fighters".
"The only thing we learn from history is that we never learn from history." -Hegel
Lenin's errors (and not only his):
1. Monopoly of one political idea leads to the inevitable formation of a caste
which serves it, to the cult of "The Supreme priest' and to the alienation from
the rest of society. The caste pursues the interests of the caste exclusively.
2. The monopoly idea creates an imbalance in the society, and retention of its
domination demands regular disinformation (the lie) and physical violence in
Soviet Russia, such as the Kronstadt rebellion [1] ,
the Gulags, Novocherkassk - June 1962' [2] , Prague-68, the Iron Curtain, among other flagrant
examples of rebellions dealt with in a horrendously repressive way.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
