Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 11/28/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (21 comments)

The "Liberal" Media is Doing it Again

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (7 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Debatable Opinions; Letters to the Editor  

 The Indianapolis Star published a letter from one of its readers in which the reader laments what she sees as the media’s getting in the way of George W. Bush’s potential to reach his true legacy of greatness. 

According to the reader, “the media have forgotten who our president is until they are ready to bash him.” 

She reminds us that, “Ever since the attack on Sept. 11, 2001, our country has been safe.” 

She goes on to defend this misunderstood president: “We cannot blame our current president for the financial mess.  Congress decided it was OK to eliminate regulations on banking to further the sale of homes to those who could not afford them.” 

Oh, where to start? 

I will get the most controversial out of the way first. Like it or not, there has been legitimate research done by learned men and women into what happened on September 11, 2001.  The mainstream media, which is the media I believe the writer is referring to, has let the commentary of “normal” Americans set the tone for how to react to the research.  They, like “normal” Americans, have condescendingly marginalized this research and the people who’ve been involved in conducting it. 

There’s enough information that at least points to conditions, situations and interactions around what happened on 9/11 to keep all levels of the news media busy until a real, nonpartisan investigation by serious people with full subpoena power can be conducted and completed.  Too many serious questions have been asked about what happened on that day and too many missteps have been made in the investigation of that horrific tragedy. 

The mainstream media has taken it upon itself to shield members of The Regime from facing criminal charges even though those charges may lead to proving that The Regime is guilty of killing 2,800 or so Americans in order to advance its military and hegemonic agenda. 

Of course, such a transparent, open, fair and honest investigation may serve to exonerate all, most, many, some or even a few members of The Regime.  The media ran, and still runs interference for The Regime in what could be the greatest crime ever committed by the American government against American citizens.  As serious as that might be, the media has served to disparage, degrade and deride anyone who suggests such a possibility or even another investigation. 

Then there’s the matter of Downing Street’s Excellent Adventure, otherwise known as The Downing Street Memo.  The memo made it very clear that The Regime had made up its mind to invade Iraq long before it actually invaded. 

The thing is, even as The Downing Street Memo or, ultimately, The Downing Street memos were being compiled, The Regime’s Front Man was telling the American people as well as the American Congress that it would use military action only as a last resort in dealing with Iraq. 

Although the so called “liberal” mainstream media reported on The Downing Street memos when they were discovered in 2005, the reports quickly faded away. 

Unlike the way it handled the discovery that the Nixon Administration had orchestrated a break-in of The Democratic Party headquarters located in The Watergate Hotel in the ‘70s or the way it handled the discovery that Bill Clinton had an affair in the ‘90s, the so called “liberal” mainstream media handled the discovery that The Front Man lied about The Regime’s plans to go to war with Iraq as if it was incidental to all of the other “important” news of 2005.  It was almost handled as an “FYI” for the American people.  And the American people accepted the news that way. 

The assertion that the fact that The US has been “safe” since September 11, 2001 is due to The Regime’s invasion of Iraq is ridiculous on its face.  This would mean that we should look at every administration which took place during a period in which The US was not attacked on its own soil as a great administration.  Consequently, carried to its logical conclusion, almost all of the administrations of almost all of the presidents of The United States were, in fact, great administrations. 

Additionally, it must not be forgotten that, before the sentence, “Ever since the attack on Sept. 11, 2001, our country has been safe” could ever have been uttered, the sentence “The awful events which occurred on September 11, 2001 occurred during The Regime’s rule or on The Bush Administration’s watch” must be uttered. 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Michael Bonanno is an associate editor for OpEdNews.

He is also a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
21 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Barely Scraping the Surface by Kip Anderson on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 9:16:42 AM
Bleak Reminder by Dan Fittro on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:10:47 AM
It's not the press guys... by Richmond Shreve on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:30:28 AM
Thank you! by Wisewoman on Sunday, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:32:34 AM
Who benefitted from 9/11? A good place to start. by W. Christopher Epler (Bill) on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:47:22 AM
What is your real point? by Starbuck on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:56:18 PM
"Liberal Media" - Thanks Ronny by Dennis Kaiser on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:43:08 PM
Yes..LIBERAL media by Starbuck on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:30:36 PM
What about Big Foot? by Gallaher on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:57:27 PM
He's Kept Us Safe by PrMaine on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:11:08 PM
AHHH the liberal media by virginius "gin" arnold on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:36:32 PM
I don't think so by Mel Smith on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 3:55:16 PM
All bets are off by Beth McKinley on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 4:21:44 PM
Thank you Elizabeth by virginius "gin" arnold on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 4:38:36 PM
it's an "us verses them" notion by shirley reese on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 5:58:05 PM
Amen by virginius "gin" arnold on Saturday, Nov 29, 2008 at 6:30:49 PM
Media is Mind Control by William Whitten on Sunday, Nov 30, 2008 at 1:24:26 AM
Well Said! by Starbuck on Monday, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:12:03 PM
Great article! by Jill Herendeen on Sunday, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:43:34 PM
Actually it's a complicit, Establishment, corporate media! by Richard Lee on Sunday, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:48:40 PM
No Liberal Media, Few Thinking Americans by arlen custer on Monday, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:49:34 AM