Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Lesser-Evil Choice Invites Self-Defeat

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 8/1/11

- Advertisement -
"The big question now," Dave Jette recently asked in OpEd News, "...is:  Are we going to continue to support a Democratic Party that no longer represents our interests or will we stand up to mount some sort of challenge outside of the two-party duopoly?"
.
This suggests that we don't know what's good for ourselves, that we're betraying ourselves by reducing our choices to the lesser of evils.  This challenge requires an examination, including questions not only of our choices, but of our values, of our integrity, of our moral courage.
.
Is the lesser-evil, for instance, not actually dark-evil but some sort of vanilla-evil? 
.
Is lesser everlasting war good enough for you?  Is lesser Social Security good enough to vote for?  How about lesser Medicare?  Lesser education for our children?
.
Isn't lesser-evil a sucker's ploy?  Rather than to cop-out, why not stand up for something actually good, something that reflects our values?  We have them, values that is, don't we?
.
Wull, batter then nothin' a'tall, you say?
.
Third parties always lose, you say?  Supporting lesser-evil is winning?  .
.
Giving up before the candidates are nominated, before the votes are counted, is solid strategy? 
.
Can't chance going for the gold when chrome plated lead is guaranteed?
.
There are no lesser winners.  Lessers are simply volunteer losers.
.
We really do want to, need to win, don't we?  We can muster the political courage, the integrity of action consistent with our values, can't we?  Or is Republican Light good enough?
.
About 2012:  Should we consider a Lesser Lesser-Evil, or a More Lesser-Evil?  Is a puzzlement.  Or dare we opt for an intelligent, straightforward, decent candidate who will decently and courageously (imagine!) represent the best interests of the bottom 311 million of our of our 312 million citizens?
.
We need to think hard over this.  This is bigger than the next election.  This is about our future, and our children's.  Or even whether or not we'll have a future. 
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

 

Leaving behind a treacherous government now addicted to perpetual war, its limitlessly greedy and power-lusting masters, as well as the retarded albeit smirky Republicans and their evermore clonish Democrat colleagues, a braindead electorate (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Military to Police American Civilians!?

Republican-Democrat Inc. vs the People

Facts or Fiction on the Wall Street Occupation

Why the U.S. Postal Service will Fall

The Fallacy of "Lesser-Evil" Choice

Not a Two-Party System, but One Two-Headed Monster

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments