Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 9 (11 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   24 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds


By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Inspiring 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 11/3/10

- Advertisement -

On the day after the election, we have learned how much government money could buy. But it was not enough! Some of the Tea Party candidates went down in flames but enough eked out wins to change the complexion of the House, and now the Republicans are making plans to repeal all the acts of the last two years and to virtually cancel all the improvements that the Democrats worked so hard to enact. Even in the President's press conference, we saw not a fighter but a man who is eager to compromise and to "work things out" with the Republicans. But the Progressives have seen enough compromise to last a good long while.

We watched as the single payer health insurance, even the "public option," was compromised off the table. Nobody bothered to mention the correction of the acts by George W. Bush and Company which were shady and blatantly illegal. We were to "let bygones be bygones" in order to salvage what was left of the United States of America. Even that salvaging operation was met by a stone wall which would not allow many proposals to pass in the manner which was intended. We will now see whether the Democratic Congressmen learned anything from the Republican tactics.

It would be simple, since the Democrats still control the Senate, if they were to do just as the Republican majority has done in the last two years. Any bills that they pass in the House can be stopped in the Senate, (if our Senators have the IQ of an angle worm.) One Senator can put a hold on even considering it, thanks to the cockamamey rules that the Republicans persuaded the gullible Democrats to approve. So filibuster it is! There is no way they can get any repeal of the health care act. If the Senate thinks that the President hasn't the intestinal fortitude to refuse to sign, they should muster the troops and not leave the decision to him.

The Republicans have plans to extend the Bush tax cuts, even for the rich. Let them expire for everybody! That's what Bush planned when he placed a time limit on them. Folks who made good money when the act was passed don't have to worry because, now, they aren't making enough money to worry much about the amount of their income tax. Most of us who are not filthy rich don't mind paying taxes anyway. We are sufficiently fond of our democracy that we are willing to pay what is needed in order to keep ourselves and our freedoms intact. We consider that as the price we pay for being Americans. Only the wealthy object to paying their dues and, since they have just demonstrated that they can spend tens of billions of dollars in buying congressmen, they can't expect much sympathy if they have to pay a bit more taxes.

Progressives need to pull up their socks and demand that the Congress recognize their determination to prevail at last. We would applaud their actions if they would block any further war funding. (Republicans cry about "too much government spending!") We are tired of seeing our sons, brothers, and fathers being retained against their will in the miserable war zones with no victory in sight after the longest war in American history. Instead of spending more money on war, we should use that money to try to rehabilitate and compensate our soldiers when they come home. Some have spent years in miserable living conditions and the sight of mayhem in the midst of constant threat to life and their repatriation to civilian life will be long and very expensive.

Progressives and many mainstream Democrats will agree with MSNBC's Ed Schultz that the conciliatory attitude of the President in his news conference was disheartening. This is no time for diplomatic playing nice. Anything that might have been accomplished in the next Congressional session will be less than satisfactory due to the increased strength of the opposition. It will take a strong stand by both the Senate and the President in order to make any progress. If that does not happen, we need a Plan B.

- Advertisement -

We need to look at the possibility of opposing President Obama in the 2012 election. There are some good possibilities waiting in the wings and we need to be looking at them. For instance, both Russ Feingold and Alan Grayson are going to be sitting out the dance for the next two years and they should be encouraged to consider running. There are many good Progressives who are qualified and we should be looking at them in the event President Obama proves to be too eager to go along to get along.

We must accept this power change not as an end to our dreams but only as a beginning. We swept Barack Obama into office in 2008 and and we can sweep him back out in 2012. It's up to him.

- Advertisement -


This writer is eighty years old and has spent a half century working with handicapped and deprived people and advocating on their behalf while caring for her own workung-class family. She spends her "Sunset Years" in writing and struggling with The (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)


The Naked Truth About Rape

Sarah Palin Simply Does Not Matter

Revolt of the Grannies!

The Truth about Your Income Tax



The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 people are discussing this page, with 24 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

My idea of what is happening on the rhetoric front... by Margaret Bassett on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:08:54 AM
Both parties needed a good fracturing! They have g... by Mary Pitt on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:33:00 AM
Case in point- Blue Dogs lost ground while Progres... by Margaret Bassett on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:19:24 AM
I believe that it's true that both parties are pai... by Mary Pitt on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:49:21 AM
The Article V Convention does not rewrite the Cons... by John De Herrera on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:03:45 PM
Once that is opened up to amendments, there is no ... by Mary Pitt on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:16:11 PM
Whatever is proposed must still be ratified. It's ... by John De Herrera on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:13:20 PM
If we do not trust our Congress, to whom will we p... by Mary Pitt on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:50:28 PM
Delegates will be elected to their positions of of... by John De Herrera on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:07:02 PM
If nothing is done we may be safer in the long run... by Paul Kruger on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:25:24 PM
I, too, think the lame duck Congress should ram th... by Mary Pitt on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:02:28 PM
If you can brainwash a bunch of idiots with slick ... by Odyseus_97 on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:54:57 PM
Perhaps a requirement that candidates accept contr... by Mary Pitt on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:24:51 PM
Apparently progressives intend to learn no lessons... by Ken Scott on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:07:53 PM
There are no longer any rules for war. George Bush... by Mary Pitt on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:33:48 PM
It was Bush who said that Constitution was just a ... by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:36:31 PM
for adding to my defense for my article. Possibly ... by Mary Pitt on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:50:39 PM
Either provide some context for your rantings or j... by Adam Smith on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:41:42 PM
Last comment was to Ken Scott.... by Adam Smith on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:43:11 PM
The increasing rigidity of those representing the ... by Donald on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:57:46 PM
Let's not forget that about 40% of the eligible el... by Scott Baker on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:43:39 PM
If we have a good, solid plan, with clear goals, a... by Arthur Avalon on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:42:49 PM
I do not think the solution lies in future electio... by Sarah Ruth on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:08:58 PM
I just do not agree to the necessity if tinkering ... by Mary Pitt on Thursday, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:29:44 PM