Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 11 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 21 (32 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   16 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Sticking the public with the bill for the bankers' crisis

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 9   Well Said 7   Valuable 5  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 6/28/10

- Advertisement -

My city feels like a crime scene and the criminals are all melting into the night, fleeing the scene. No, I'm not talking about the kids in black who smashed windows and burned cop cars on Saturday.

I'm talking about the heads of state who, on Sunday night, smashed social safety nets and burned good jobs in the middle of a recession. Faced with the effects of a crisis created by the world's wealthiest and most privileged strata, they decided to stick the poorest and most vulnerable people in their countries with the bill.

How else can we interpret the G20's final communique, which includes not even a measly tax on banks or financial transactions, yet instructs governments to slash their deficits in half by 2013. This is a huge and shocking cut, and we should be very clear who will pay the price: students who will see their public educations further deteriorate as their fees go up; pensioners who will lose hard-earned benefits; public-sector workers whose jobs will be eliminated. And the list goes on. These types of cuts have already begun in many G20 countries including Canada, and they are about to get a lot worse.

They are happening for a simple reason. When the G20 met in London in 2009, at the height of the financial crisis, the leaders failed to band together to regulate the financial sector so that this type of crisis would never happen again. All we got was empty rhetoric, and an agreement to put trillions of dollars in public monies on the table to shore up the banks around the world. Meanwhile the U.S. government did little to keep people in their homes and jobs, so in addition to hemorrhaging public money to save the banks, the tax base collapsed, creating an entirely predictable debt and deficit crisis.

At this weekend's summit, Prime Minister Stephen Harper convinced his fellow leaders that it simply wouldn't be fair to punish those banks that behaved well and did not create the crisis (despite the fact that Canada's highly protected banks are consistently profitable and could easily absorb a tax). Yet somehow these leaders had no such concerns about fairness when they decided to punish blameless individuals for a crisis created by derivative traders and absentee regulators.

Last week, The Globe and Mail published a fascinating article about the origins of the G20. It turns out the entire concept was conceived in a meeting back in 1999 between then finance minister Paul Martin and his U.S. counterpart Lawrence Summers (itself interesting since Mr. Summers was at that time playing a central role in creating the conditions for this financial crisis allowing a wave of bank consolidation and refusing to regulate derivatives).

- Advertisement -

The two men wanted to expand the G7, but only to countries they considered strategic and safe. They needed to make a list but apparently they didn't have paper handy. So, according to reporters John Ibbitson and Tara Perkins, "the two men grabbed a brown manila envelope, put it on the table between them, and began sketching the framework of a new world order." Thus was born the G20.

The story is a good reminder that history is shaped by human decisions, not natural laws. Mr. Summers and Mr. Martin changed the world with the decisions they scrawled on the back of that envelope. But there is nothing to say that citizens of G20 countries need to take orders from this hand-picked club.

Already, workers, pensioners and students have taken to the streets against austerity measures in Italy, Germany, France, Spain and Greece, often marching under the slogan: "We won't pay for your crisis." And they have plenty of suggestions for how to raise revenues to meet their respective budget shortfalls.

Many are calling for a financial transaction tax that would slow down hot money and raise new money for social programs and climate change. Others are calling for steep taxes on polluters that would underwrite the cost of dealing with the effects of climate change and moving away from fossil fuels. And ending losing wars is always a good cost-saver.

The G20 is an ad hoc institution with none of the legitimacy of the United Nations. Since it just tried to stick us with a huge bill for a crisis most of us had no hand in creating, I say we take a cue from Mr. Martin and Mr. Summers. Flip it over, and write on the back of the envelope: Return to sender.

Naomi Klein is the author of The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, now out in paperback. To read all her latest writing visit

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Our Lives Are Under Threat From Some of the Most Powerful and Richest Entities -- Here's How We Can Fight Back and Win

Gulf oil spill: A hole in the world

Occupy Wall Street: The Most Important Thing in the World Now

HopeOver, HopeLash, HopeBreak: A Lexicon of Disappointment

Hurricane Sandy: beware of America's disaster capitalists

Capitalism vs. the Climate


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The UN is not legitimate either. In fact Ms Klein,... by mikel paul on Tuesday, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:52:47 AM
I would disagree that the UN is not legitimate. I ... by Charlie L on Tuesday, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:55:41 PM
as you say...a valuable step in human beings actin... by mikel paul on Tuesday, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:41:05 PM
Why is it that the United States would rather be a... by Freddie Venezia on Wednesday, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:32:23 AM
I don't either. How do we treat each other? That's... by mikel paul on Wednesday, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:57:46 AM
Stick it to Them! But then, get busy with criminal... by boomerang on Tuesday, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:44:38 PM
Naomi, You Rock! This article is wonderful. ... by lisa flavin on Tuesday, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:56:47 PM
The clarity and the phrases used bespeak a profess... by Robert Hoogenboom on Wednesday, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:22:08 AM
Key elected officials were bought and paid for wit... by Steven G. Erickson on Tuesday, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:56:50 PM
With postage due!... by Donald on Tuesday, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:33:55 PM
Naomi Klein is clearly not a student of history or... by Joan Mootry on Tuesday, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:03:29 PM
I agree. I think she is protecting her new positi... by WML on Thursday, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:27:41 AM
"WML"The agreement that Ms Klein " clearly not... by Ethan Allen on Monday, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:40:33 AM
was one in generality, not with every word, as mos... by WML on Monday, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:13:54 AM
Read the latest polls. Americans are worried about... by Freddie Venezia on Wednesday, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:51:55 AM
You would make a Great President. You think like F... by Debbie S on Wednesday, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:38:38 AM