Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 7 (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   40 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Small Change: Obama's Betrayal

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to None 2/4/09

Become a Fan
  (68 fans)
- Advertisement -

By Dave Lindorff

Just two weeks after his historic inauguration ceremony, Obama’s presidency is lurching towards failure, and not because three of his administration picks have been found to be tax cheats, but because nearly all of his administration picks are corporate whores and shills.

The problem with the new Obama administration is that it is turning out to be not about change at all, as he claimed during the campaign, but rather about more of the same—and these are not times that call for more of the same. Nor is more of the same the reason Obama won the election.

The economic team President Obama has put in place is composed of the same Wall Street hacks and conservative economic theologians who helped produce the current crisis, many of them as part of the Clinton administration, and some, like Timothy Geithner, actually as appointees of the thoroughly discredited Bush administration.

Obama’s military team is essentially composed of holdovers from the Bush administration, starting at the top with Defense Secretary Robert Gates, and retreads from the Clinton administration.

Little wonder that the president’s economic team is still talking about throwing more money at banks, with the only real tweak making this boondoggle different from the Bush administration’s fall bailout that there will be some limits established on executive pay. Banks will still be able to use their taxpayer bailout cash to buy other banks. And there will still be no way to force them to lend money. Little wonder too that there is no real effort aimed at propping up the struggling public—no job sweeping job creation programs (except for expanding the military), no major income supplements for the poor, no expansion of welfare benefits, no mandatory mortgage renegotiations or mortgage payment holidays. And so far, no real effort to pass labor law reform to protect workers who try to form labor unions.

Little wonder too that Obama seems to be backing away from his key campaign promise to end the war in Iraq, and that the one area where he is moving rapidly is in expanding the war in Afghanistan and the tribal areas of western Pakistan.

If there is any new thinking going on in the new Obama White House, it seems focused on ways to neuter the progressive forces that put him in that building in the first place. In this, Obama is running true to form for a Democratic president. Traditionally, at least since the days of the New Deal, Democrats have run for office promising progressive government, and have then run away from their promises as quickly as possible. The difference with Obama is that he is betraying his base faster than any of his predecessors. His latest appointment of New Hampshire Republican Senator Judd Gregg as Commerce Secretary is a case in point—a man deeply conservative, opposed to the very existence of the Commerce Department he will head, and to top it off, Obama worked out a deal to have the Democratic governor of New Hampshire fill Gregg’s vacated Senate seat with a Republican appointee, forfeiting the right to add a Democrat to the Senate and eliminate any chance of Republican filibusters.

- Advertisement -

In this instance, Obama’s strategy is growing increasingly clear. He and the Democrats in Congress don’t seem to really want to pass progressive legislation, such as the Employee Free Choice Act, and they probably don’t really want to appoint true liberal judges to the appellate and the Supreme Court, either. That being the case, they are happy to leave Republicans with 41 Senate seats and at least the theoretical power to block Democratic legislation. That way, they can simply not offer up such legislation or such nominees, claiming these efforts would be doomed by a Republican filibuster. It’s a fraudulent claim, of course. When the Democrats were in the minority in the Senate during the penultimate four years of the Bush administration, they didn’t use the filibuster weapon to prevent Republican legislation. And the Republicans today are in a much weaker position, with a Democratic president who, at least theoretically, could bring considerable pressure on Republican legislators to do his bidding, or see their home states suffer.

One can puzzle over why a Democratic president would so quickly abandon his base, when Republicans, in contrast, have always strived so mightily to cater to theirs. My guess is that people like Obama cling to the long-discredited theory that the way to win elections is to appeal to some mythical “middle-of-the-road” electorate, and that thusly, he and his advisers, their eyes already on the 2012 election, are trying to position him as the candidate of the center.

Sadly, for both him and for all of us, this is a doomed strategy. The economy and the wars in the Middle East both call for dramatic action of the kind that Obama’s voters and especially his activist base wanted and expected from him when they backed him last fall: In the case of the economy, a return to a kind of modern New Deal that would vastly expand funding for education right through college, that would dramatically expand unemployment compensation, job training benefits and welfare and child-care programs, that would expand Medicare to everyone, and that would end the subsidies for outsourcing of jobs and the relocation of businesses overseas; In the case of foreign policy, a prompt end to the Iraq War, a winding down of the Afghanistan War, and a termination of the so-called “war” on terror, with a refocus on international police cooperation and action against terrorist organizations.

Some of these things may eventually come to pass, but only when it becomes painfully obvious that the half measures and worn out strategies being applied to the economy have failed, and after the US faces being driven out of Iraq and Afghanistan—and even then only after the people who elected this president have taken to the streets to demonstrate against his betrayals. That awareness, of course, will come after the wasted spending of trillions of misdirected “stimulus” dollars and the wasted loss of hundreds or thousands of American lives, not to mention perhaps hundreds of thousands of Iraqi, Afghani and Pakistani lives.

It is, of course, still early in the game. Perhaps, with Obama’s shabby appointments of people like Geithner, Tom Daschle and Nancy Killefer causing an uproar, with his top generals openly trying to undermine him, and with Republicans starting to regain their confidence and refusing to play his “non-partisan” game, opting instead for a strategy of political obstruction, he may realize that he needs his the enthusiastic backing of his liberal base. If this happens, that base needs to make him realize that, in the wake of his early betrayals, he is going to have to earn their support.

- Advertisement -

The “Kumbaya” and “This Land is Our Land” singing is over, and unless Obama starts singing a different tune soon, he will spend the next four years presiding over a shattered economy and a nation mired in a distant, pointless and unwinnable war.

DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist. His latest book is “The Case for Impeachment” (St. Martin’s Press, 2006 and now available in paperback edition). His work is available at


Dave Lindorff is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel's Gaza Atrocities Recall America's Atrocities in Vietnam

The Case for Impeachment of President Barack Obama

Barack Obama: Manchurian Candidate Version 2.0

Free John Walker Lindh, Bush's and Cheney's First Torture Victim!

What Nobody's Saying: The Bailout Will Kill the Dollar


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
20 people are discussing this page, with 40 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

for him only 3 months ago? You knew perfectly ... by Richard Mynick on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:49:23 PM
The Power Elite wanted Obama?  Why else would... by Dennis Kaiser on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:37:26 PM
While some of the responsibility for the present s... by dickdoe on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:00:51 PM
"You knew perfectly well at that time th... by Perry Logan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:02:55 PM
isnt it? "Everyone misses this but me and per... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:11:02 PM
It is not "magical, super powers"--it... by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:00:13 PM
Your argument is "If this were true, it seems... by Richard Mynick on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:10:47 PM
McCain-Palin scared the hell out of me, more than ... by GLloyd Rowsey on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:11:21 AM
This means that COTO has been right all along?&nbs... by Michael Cavlan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:11:25 PM
it is jumping the gun at that. I'm very happy ... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:56:13 PM
With all due respect, of course you are happy with... by Michael Cavlan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:02:49 PM
your Govt filled with Tax Cheats, Corporate Shills... by shadow dancer on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:56:33 PM
Why didn't liberals see this man for who he wa... by jersey girl on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:01:42 PM
The alternative choice in this election was McCain... by Dennis Kaiser on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:08:59 PM
That's what those of us that refused to vote f... by jersey girl on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:51:21 AM
So I voted for the first time in 24 years, for Oba... by GLloyd Rowsey on Saturday, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:08:37 AM
Out of Iraq?  When? He's fudged on this o... by jersey girl on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:12:11 PM
I dont know what you do for work, but have you eve... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:58:53 PM
Ok here's a little work analogy for ya.  ... by jersey girl on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:46:33 AM
project manager who takes over the reins foll... by Richard Mynick on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:34:04 AM
  From the WHITE HOUSE website for President ... by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:06:19 PM
always been at war with east asia............. by jersey girl on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:13:26 PM
Obama didn't come out of the blue like some ne... by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:14:19 PM
Wake up people.... nobody will be elected presiden... by Dennis Kaiser on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:13:56 PM
The openly obstructionist NeoCons and Republicrats... by Jere Hough on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:20:02 PM
Nobody is blaming "all the problems of the ce... by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:55:27 PM
Looing to Obama for "Change" is like wea... by Jeff Harris on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:50:42 AM
Bush is gone,can we give this guy 90 days before w... by Dan7447 on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:23:22 PM
"The Obamania bubble should already have begu... by William Whitten on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:01:33 AM
Well said Dave. You are merely stating the obvious... by Munich on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:56:37 PM
well we will just have to wait and see, it's g... by paul russel on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:04:38 AM
Ah, but see we aren't just squawking by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:32:23 PM
conversation I was "Physically Around" w... by shadow dancer on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:02:02 AM
It should be obvious by now that we have a one-par... by Goblue on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:36:09 AM
David Lindorff's article is outstanding. Those... by Sherwood Ross on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:39:34 AM
If dennis isn't too old come the next election... by liberalsrock on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:00:36 AM
Congressman Ron Paul30 years of obeying and honori... by Chris Bieber on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:04:55 PM
He has a lot of work to do.  No one is perfec... by Bike Servant on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:29:25 AM
in 2006 I voted for democrats for "change&quo... by Jeff Harris on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:45:12 AM