Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   15 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Reject Nuclear Power - Here's Why

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Group(s): , Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 1/26/13

Reject Nuclear Power -- Here's Why

Citizens do not want nuclear power 1 . They know it is both far too dangerous and far too expensive. Politicians want nuclear power because they know it puts Power in their hands. This is exactly paralleled by politicians embracing nuclear weapons. They think it gives them power and this is what they want above all else. Citizens do not want nuclear weapons because they know they are insanely dangerous and what they want is to live without the threat of sudden and complete annihilation hanging over them and their children at all times. As we will see there is a close relationship between the weapons and the power in every sense of the word.

Politicians have different agendas to the people on these issues. The remedy is for us to wise up, get organised and then instruct them to do what we want - or join the job market.

The main objections to nuclear power are outlined below under the following headings:

  • Nuclear power stations are prohibitively dangerous
  • Nuclear power stations are prohibitively expensive
  • Nuclear power stations use the same technology as that required to manufacture nuclear weapons
  • The resulting nuclear waste will be dangerous for thousands of years
  • Plant and waste deposit storage are vulnerable to terrorist attack
  • Nuclear power stations epitomise the centralisation of power
  • Poor countries are made dependent on rich ones
  • These plants draw funds away from the development of sustainable energy
  • The uranium fuel will become increasingly scarce.
  • The support of nuclear power by government results from special pleading lobbying by the industry.

 

These aspects are briefly expanded upon below.

Nuclear power stations are prohibitively dangerous

There have now been four grave nuclear reactor accidents: Windscale in Britain in 1957 (the one that is never mentioned), Three Mile Island in the United States in 1979, Chernobyl in the Soviet Union in 1986, and now Fukushima. Each accident was unique, and each was supposed to be impossible.

A recent book, Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, concludes that, based on records now available, some 985,000 people died between 1986 and 2004, mainly of cancer, as a result of the Chernobyl accident.

Alice Slater, New York representative of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, comments: "The tragic news uncovered by comprehensive new research that almost one million people died in the toxic aftermath of Chernobyl should be a wake-up call to people all over the world to petition their governments to put a halt to the current industry-driven 'nuclear renaissance.' Aided by a corrupt IAEA, the world has been subjected to a massive cover-up and deception about the true damages caused by Chernobyl."

At Fukushima we have the worst industrial disaster ever. Three simultaneous ongoing complete meltdowns have proven impossible to stop or contain since they started almost 2 years ago. These meltdowns are still pouring radiation pollution across the Japanese landscape.

International experts agree that there will continue to be disastrous failures at nuclear power stations and that this cannot be avoided 2 .

As Edward Teller, the great nuclear physicist, said, 'If you [try to] construct something foolproof, there will always be a fool greater than the proof,'

Nuclear power stations are prohibitively expensive

Nuclear power stations are so expensive that they are never built without substantial contribution to their costs from citizens in the form of subsidies.

The UK government has said it will not subsidies new nuclear power stations. However this seems to refer to the most overt form of subsidies and not to "hidden " subsidies.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

N/A

I had a consultancy practice in Landscape Architecture from which I have now retired. I am also a writer and painter. I have become increasingly concerned at governments'continuing, and counterproductive, use of violence to solve conflicts. With (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Has our species become insane?

Saving ourselves from the psychopaths

"The worst crimes in UK history'

Reject Nuclear Power - Here's Why

Nuclear Weapons - Hope At Last

Trident the Deterrent - A Terrifying Myth

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This is a hugely important topic.... by Jim McCluskey on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:11:19 PM
... the world took the wrong direction back in the... by B. Ross Ashley on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:18:58 PM
Thorium is Borium...Solar (of all flavors):... Is ... by CaptD on Sunday, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:38:04 PM
All the power you would ever need could come from ... by David Mills on Sunday, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:21:22 PM
click heresnip There is a rash of m... by CaptD on Monday, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:02:01 PM
If you had you wouldn't have written half of this ... by David Mills on Monday, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:16:07 PM
Thanks for this, Ros.   ... by Jim McCluskey on Monday, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:55:12 AM
Unfortunately it won't produce near what you need.... by David Mills on Monday, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:14:22 PM
The first is the little publicized Fukushima fue... by Mark Goldes on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:59:41 PM
Thorium would be an entirely different kind of nuc... by David Mills on Sunday, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:28:41 PM
The Future Children of Fukushima The Children o... by Joe Giambrone on Sunday, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:45:19 PM
Regarding the poorly designed steam generator tube... by CaptD on Sunday, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:32:14 PM
A 1.2 Billion Dollar Ripoff by Edison/SDG&E of... by CaptD on Sunday, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:35:32 PM
How would ANY Country afford to pay for a Trillion... by CaptD on Sunday, Jan 27, 2013 at 5:06:21 PM
NRC Reports Incomplete, Inconclusive, Inconsistent... by CaptD on Monday, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:42:16 PM