Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

General News

Reefer Madness in Vermont

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (28 fans)
- Advertisement -

MARIJUANA ISSUE RAISED BY VERMONT REPUBLICAN RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR 

      By William Boardman   Email address removed"> Email address removed

In a fundraising email sent out on Wednesday, Aug. 8, the Republican candidate for Governor of Vermont claimed that "Governor [Peter] Shumlin is making decriminalization of marijuana one of his top priorities," although Republican Randy Brock doesn't cite any source for that assertion. 

Shumlin has long supported moving toward decriminalization of marijuana in Vermont, but there little evidence it's one of his "top priorities," which include providing Vermonters with universal health care, developing more affordable housing, and taking care of the growing numbers of homeless people. http://nlihc.org/article/vermont-advocates-celebrate-multiple-wins-legislative-session  

Referring to a report in the Burlington Free Press, Brock's email wrongly claims "that Governor Shumlin took the highly unusual step of personally calling the head of a marijuana legalization organization and volunteering to be their national spokesman " in exchange for a max-out contribution of $6,000, of course (8/6/12)."  As it turns out, NORML is giving Shumlin $2,000.

What Terri Hallenbeck wrote, with some ambiguity, on her August 7 Free Press blog was:   "Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the pro-marijuana group NORML,  doesn't get many calls like this . Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin rang him up last week, he said, and told him he'd like to be a national spokesman for the marijuana reform movement."   

Nowhere does Hallenbeck suggest that Shumlin wasn't to be a spokesman for NORML, as Brock asserts, nor does she confirm Brock's claim of a quid pro quo between Shumlin and NORML. 

http://blogs.burlingtonfreepress.com/politics/2012/08/07/shumlin-makes-new-best-friend-over-marijuana-decriminalization/  

- Advertisement -

The blog post was inspired by the NORML executive director's own August 3 report on the NORML blog of a recent phone call with Shumlin.  NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, was founded in 1970 "to move public opinion sufficiently to achieve the repeal of marijuana prohibition so that the responsible use of cannabis by adults is no longer subject to penalty."  In 2010, when Shumlin first ran for governor, NORML contributed $1,000 to his campaign. 

What NORML's St. Pierre wrote had nothing to do with Shumlin being a spokesman for NORML, but referred gratefully to Shumlin's being a spokesman for the same cause.  This is pretty much what Shumlin has been doing for years. 

When Brock voted as a state senator against a medical marijuana bill in 2010, he presumably knew his then fellow-senator Shumlin favored the bill.  And he's presumably also aware that in April 2012, Governor Shumlin signed a medical marijuana bill into Vermont law. http://governor.vermont.gov/search/node/marijuana 

Brock's email is wrong, but it's not clear whether he was misled by Hallenbeck's ambiguous report, or whether his campaign did its due diligence and then just went ahead and lied. 

NORML is an interest group no different in form from any interest group supporting Brock or any other candidate.  In response to Shumlin's call expressing support for NORML's interest, the executive director acted normally, explaining to his readers first how they could contribute to NORMALPAC or, as an alternative, how they could contribute to the Shumlin campaign directly. click here;

- Advertisement -

According to Hallenbeck, Brock's reaction on August 6 to news of the NORML-Shumlin connection was to say: "I'm astounded that we have a governor who is seeking money as a result of supporting decriminalization of a drug the possession of which is against federal law."

She does not say why Senator Brock seems to think it's wrong to follow the normal legislative process to seek reform in the case of marijuana.  She did say that, if he became governor, Brock promised to veto any legislation that decriminalized marijuana. 

Shumlin has promised to seek legislation that decriminalizes small amounts of marijuana, but he has not yet taken a stand on a specific amount. 

In his NORML blog, St. Pierre concluded on a hopeful note from his perspective:  "cannabis law reformers have worked hard and long to arrive at these days where, according to most recent   Gallup polling , legalization is more popular than prohibition--let's help finish this process sooner than later by helping to elect the political allies we need to replace the failed and expensive public policy of Cannabis Prohibition with logical alternatives."

click here;

 

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Other media around the state picked up on this sto... by William Boardman on Thursday, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:09:04 PM
Law enforcement needs to re-direct its focus o... by Hugh Yonn on Friday, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:53:06 AM
All card-carrying members of the DEA need to read... by Hugh Yonn on Friday, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:55:42 AM