Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 9/26/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (6 comments)

Cowboy McCain Makes Cowboy Bush Look Like A Genius

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (176 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

McCain comes riding and farting into Washington on his blind donkey, pressuring congress to rush things that are already being rushed too much so the debate will proceed. He politicizes negotiations, because if the house doesn't show that things were NOT settled, then McCain looks even more like an impulsive fool who wasted a lot of time and bluster rushing to DC. So his house Republican enablers rescue him by killing whatever progress was made on coming up with a solution.

The thing is, the Democrats are in a bind. If THEY hold things up, then Bush and the Republicans will accuse them of doing what they are always accused of-- preventing things from getting done. If they push a bill through, then the Republicans can play the Populist heroes, blocking passage of a bill that most voters don't like. The Dems are screwed either way.

Frankly, Bush-Cheney thrive best in situations like this, where they can engage in their secret machinations with the heat of media coverage focused elsewhere. But this time, they're doing their work-- work for the biggest corporations in the light of day and the member of congress are letting them get away with it.

What's that? Today, the biggest bank failure in US history occurred. How was it handled? The spoils, the remaining assets were given as a gift to Morgan Stanley. Wait a minute. Didn't they just last week convert to a commercial bank? And just days later, they are in place to take over the largest failed bank in history. What about those dusty old anti-trust laws? We're seeing more emergency mergers, coming harder and faster than any time in modern economic history.

It brings to mind Rachel Carson's historic book, Silent Spring. She described how the use of toxic pesticides was ascending the food chain, killing the carnivores at the top, where the most pesticide was accumulating. Today, we have huge companies. Vermont independent senator Bernie Sanders says "if a business is too big to fail it is too big to exist." Yet we're seeing these huge dying dinosauric examples of decrepitude being coprophagically eaten up by fellow dinosaurs. They all deserve to die. They are parts of a financial system built upon bad theories and high flying financial concepts, like derivatives and default swaps which should not be allowed to exist.

And we're watching this financial Silent Spring implode right before our eyes. A $700 billion or $7 trillion dollar bailout will only stave off the inevitable. Allowing these massive mergers will cost tens of thousands of jobs, create massive excess commercial real estate vacancies and ultimately condense power to a smaller, less diverse group of megacorporations.


This is bad for consumers, taxpayers, America, international finance and humanity. So maybe, totally unintentionally, McCain, the idiot cowboy, is doing some good. Maybe like Parsifal, the fool who finds the holy grail, he's doing some good, forcing the Democrats to take another look, rather that doing their usual-- make some noise than give Dubya what he's asked for. So far, it looks like the Republicans have out-finessed the Dems in congress.

I wrote earlier that any good lawyer knows that whoever writes the first draft of any deal has the advantage. The Dems and Republicans in congress need to throw out Paulson's proposal and come up with a new solution-- one that rewards the smart companies with good leaders that have weathered this crisis because of good judgment and strategic planning. It is idiocy to pour more money into the failing companies. The urgent need is to maintain liquidity-- keep the loans flowing. The solution is to support the winners, not the losers.

What kind of message does it send to responsible companies when the losers are rewarded? The answer is to allow the failures to fail and reward the strong, responsible companies. That seems so simple. Why can't the members of congress get it?

One word-- lobbyists.

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Grave by Archie on Friday, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:09:11 PM
SCREWED AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN ... by Professor Fandel on Friday, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:23:48 PM
I never thought of it that way before. by Donald Michael Schwartz on Friday, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:12:58 PM
Finally got them by the Balls, by Mel Smith on Friday, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:15:39 PM
More Theft From the Taxpayers by macdon1 on Saturday, Sep 27, 2008 at 3:16:27 AM
simple wisdom by Calvin Davis on Saturday, Sep 27, 2008 at 4:58:49 PM