Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 6 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   9 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Problematic Southern Culture: Venerating Disastrous Leaders

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 2/12/09

Become a Fan
  (27 fans)
<em>Introductory Remark:

Here's a proposition I am convinced is true, but that I will not elaborate here sufficiently to prove it:  the problems in America that are manifested in the presidency of George W. Bush are problems ESPECIALLY of the American South.  That the South was solidly red in both 2000 and 2004 is but one part of a complex and deep picture that substantiates this notion.

The presidency of George W. Bush has passed, praise the Lord.  But we are still compelled to grapple with the lessons of this dark period of our history.  We are so compelled not only because the damage the Bushites did will take years to repair, but also because the various cultural forces that it expressed remain present and active in the American cultural system.  Those cultural forces --psychological, spiritual, political-- existed in America (and particularly in the American South) long before Bush, and they will persist into our future.

It is therefore an essential part of the course of healing to which America is now called to explore those forces, and in particular to seek to understand the forms of consciousness that structure thought and feeling, value and meaning, in the American South.

It is in the context of that quest for understanding that I am launching here what I expect will be a series of occasional pieces exploring questions about the culture of the South.  Here is the first entry in that series.</em>

******************************************


Some years ago, I found on the Internet a site where one could play chess against a computer program.  One of the things I liked about that chess program was that it enabled one to live out alternative histories.  At a given juncture, one could try a move and see what happened.  If, after several more moves, one decided that the move had proved regrettable, one could click the back arrow several times until one came back to the original juncture, at which one could try a different one.

Would that life were like that.  But of course it's not.  People make decisions --in their private lives and as nations-- and then, as Omar the Tentmaker wrote so long ago,

<blockquote>The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it
</blockquote>

History shows, of course, that peoples can re-write their histories in the sense of lying and denying.  But they are nonetheless stuck with the consequences of the decisions they made and of what really happened.

***

That the Civil War was an unmitigated disaster for the American South seems beyond any serious question.  A major proportion of its menfolk were killed or maimed, its land was devastated, its economy ruined, its way of life was abolished, its whole population deeply traumatized.  The South paid an enormous price for the choices that its leaders made:  to secede from the Union, to wage war to preserve its newly declared independence, to continue with the war well beyond the point where the ultimate outcome was clear.  And the costs of those disastrous choices were paid for generations.

If history could be lived like that computerized chess game I used to play, is there any rational Southerner from that era, or in the generations growing up in the aftermath of the Civil War, who would not choose to click the back button back to the time of Lincoln's election in 1860 and play the game out along a very different course?

***

What does a people most need, and most want from its leaders?   Would the answer not be that the people would want their leaders to make decisions that lead to favorable outcomes for the people and their nation?  Would not a people --if they were rational-- respect and appreciate least those leaders whose decisions lead them into disaster?

Yet that does not seem to be how the South regards its leaders of that era of catastrophic decision-making that led to the ruination (described above) of the whole region.  To cite one prominent example:  How many schools, how many major avenues, are named after Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederacy?  The answer:  a great many.  (I leave out the veneration of the military leaders of the Confederacy who, for the most part, executed rather than made the disastrous policy.)

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Andy Schmookler, an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher, was the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia's 6th District. He is the author of various books including The Parable of the Tribes: The (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Like Colbert? Article Plus Critique

Mel Gibson's Rant as Profound Clue

To Anti-Obamite Lefties: It Doesn't Matter If You're Right

How Important is the Loss of Friendship?

The Mystery of Obama's Relationship with Power

Power and Corruption: Just What Is Their Relationship?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Having grown up in the South and having lived in s... by Brenda Thornton on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:34:51 AM
I moved to south Georgia about five years ago from... by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:44:54 PM
Does that mean I better not? I need an answer!On t... by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:43:40 PM
Mark, Savannah is a coastal retreat, it is much mo... by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:13:20 PM
come to Savannah for vacation. They have GT campus... by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:48:26 PM
I also live in Georgia and welcome the influx of n... by Amanda Lang on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:24:07 PM
Andy, since reading your masterwork, “The pa... by Herbert Calhoun on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:00:53 PM
a Confederate General Albert Pike? This man has a ... by Stanimal on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:29:52 AM
I know Pike...yes, Illuminati, High Mason. He is t... by William Whitten on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:03:59 PM