We may be the last generation that will have ever known privacy.
Every day, we are one step closer to the Total Surveillance Society. Every day, we lose a little more of that part of being human that claims the right to be left alone, that knows freedom from the prying eyes of the corporate state, that has the boldness to claim some inner sanctum where the all-seeing eyes of technology cannot penetrate.
The dystopian dreams of mid-20th Century writers like George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, Philip K. Dick and Barry Malzberg are coming true all around us, but it seems the majority of citizens are so dazed by mass media distractions, by government-instilled fear, and by the drudgery of their daily existence that they can't be bothered to wake up and take stock of what is being taken from them.
Our telephones don't just transmit our voices from point A to point B anymore. The government is there in the middle between us and those with whom we speak, listening, analyzing, weighing the possibility that we are Enemy Combatants who should be whisked away in the dead of night and stored in a cage from which we'll be periodically extracted for "harsh interrogation."
The telecom companies which have been entrusted with the sanctity of our private conversations have not only rolled over -- all of them but Qwest and CREDO Mobile, anyway. They have acquiesced to the demands of government that they allow federal goons to hover over our every word. They have been paid handsomely for their complicity, but at the cost of their humanity and our freedom. And now they have been told by a spineless and morally bankrupt Congress that they won't ever be held accountable; that it's OK to break the law when the President tells you to do it. If you are rich and powerful enough to buy Congressmen, then the law apparently wasn't meant to apply to you, anyway.
The telecom companies (again, with the notable exceptions of Qwest and CREDO) have no problem at all handing the info over to the government -- and that's without a court order. And as we sadly found out July 9, a spineless Senate (with the exception of 28 true patriots) is more than willing to give them carte blanche to do so, by including telecom immunity in the FISA bill.
"Congress has been far too compliant as President Bush undermined the Bill of Rights and the balance of powers," The New York Times editorialized on July 8. According to the Times, the FISA bill just approved by both the House and Senate needlessly expands the government's ability to spy on Americans and ensures that the country will never know the full extend of President Bush's unlawful, warrantless wiretapping.
Even though the old FISA law, enacted in 1978 as a response to the abuses perpetrated by the Nixon administration, created a court which, over a 30-year period, approved nearly 20,000 wiretapping warrants while rejecting perhaps a half-dozen, according to the Times, and in any case, the government can wiretap first and get permission later in moments of crisis, that wasn't enough for Bush and an eerily compliant Congress. The new bill, the Times said, makes it much easier to spy on Americans at home, reduces the courts' powers and grants immunity to the companies that turned over Americans' private communications without a warrant.
The new FISA bill, now the law of the land thanks to an imperial president and a spineless Congress, allows the government to bypass the FISA court entirely and collect large amounts of Americans' communications without a warrant simply by declaring that it is doing so "for reasons of national security." "It cuts the vital "foreign power" provision from FISA, never mentions counterterrorism and defines national security so broadly that experts think the term could mean almost anything a president wants it to mean," the Times noted.
Apparently Congress goes along with the attitude that if you're the President or his lackeys in the intelligence agencies, you don't follow the law -- you ARE the law, and you make it up as you go along, spinning lies upon lies as you gut the Constitution, barely able to conceal your contempt for the weak legislative branch which cowers at the mention of those nebulous bad men who are supposed to be such a threat to our freedoms that we should give them up preemptively.
Our computers don't just connect us to the World Wide Web anymore. Now instead of just being our dumb servants they are silently, secretly reporting on us, every moment of our surfing, every click, every choice, every view open to review by those governmental or corporate entities large enough to laugh at our pitiful expectations of privacy and autonomy.
Highly classified programs are run by a variety of federal intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Government agents are hunched vulture-like over their desks at this very minute, observing, storing and analyzing the communications, spending habits and travel patterns of U.S. citizens, searching for "suspicious activity," with all the breadth and ambiguity -- and potential for practically inevitable abuse -- that phrase implies.
The U.S. government's warrantless surveillance of its own citizens includes data-mining programs that allow the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to sift through large databanks of emails, phone calls, and online transactions and conversations, not for specific information, but in search of suspicious patterns. It's all grist for the dark satanic mills of a world view based on fear, secrecy and suppression.
Information as seemingly routine as everyday bank transactions is kept in databases similarly monitored by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Homeland Security and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).
Hidden in current Senate housing legislation is a sweeping provision authored by Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) that affects the privacy and operation of nearly all of America's small businesses. The provision, which was added by the bill's managers without debate a couple of weeks ago, would require the nation's payment systems to track, aggregate, and report to the federal government information on nearly every electronic transaction.
I'm a 48-year-old writer, editor, ex-musician, dreamer, reality catcher, ex-con, and father. I have three kids, five tattoos, a criminal record, a terminal disease, and an attitude. I was born in Alabama and spent the first 38 years of my life there (more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
With the passage of the new FISA bill, the democrats in office have proved one thing to me again; there is no real difference, in most cases, between the parties any more. The majority of elected federal offices( thankfully not Sen Wyden or Rep Wu from OR) are filled with elitists that will tell the people almost anything to get elected and once they are in office will vote the elitist agendas no matter the party they belong to, or the will of the people.
I hate to think it, but I'm almost to the point of saying it's time for a new revolution of the people, as it may be the only way to get OUR COUNTRY back and return power to the citizens of this once great nation. As a wise man once said" Those willing to give up some freedom in exchange for security, deserve neither security, nor freedom" (slight misquote maybe, but thats the gist of it)
The problem is most people are so brain washed by the corporate media that they don't have a clue or they are more concerned about which new big screen plasma tv,or SUV to buy, rather than paying attention to the selling out of our country to the corporate elitists. Remember," People get the government they deserve"; and if you don't pay attention and aren't involved, then the sociopathic elitists will be more than thrilled to run your life.
I'm sure this post will raise some flags in the intell programs and wouldn't' be surprised if the thought police show up at my door to confiscate my computer. How far away are we from Orwell's thought police, Bradbury's firemen, or Hitlers brown shirts? How long until all free minded Americans are sittin in the new internment camps Haliburton is building for "FEMA"
Laugh all the way to gitmo while calling me a conspiracy crackpot if you like!!! WE ARE ONLY 1 MORE ATTACK, WITHIN OUR BORDERS, FROM MARTIAL LAW AND A SUSPENSION OF ALL CIVIL LIBERTIES, INCLUDING ELECTIONS, compliments of the various HOMELAND SECURITY ACTS that our ELECTED OFFICIALS have passed and are passing to DESTROY OUR CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS.
You can't "Vote For Change" if the elections are "suspended" due to national emergency and imposition of "temporary emergency measures" available to the president under the HSA. We are being sold out by the members of both parties. Or should I say the members of the plutocratic party; bought and payed for by the World Banks???
by
comncents (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 5:05:11 AM
is stored in their file, along with the web-sites and articles viewed through your IP address. The government has had this ability for some time now to do this.
All you banking and credit card transactions are kept on-file too, in order to identify how and where you spend your money. Along with this information is your medical, criminal, voter registration, vehicle, insurance and educational history, providing the authorities with a total picture of your life, accessible to those who "need to know" basis.
When you think how many times your picture is taken on a daily basis by security cameras and with cell phones having a GPS locater, they have done studies that show most people have a routine pattern and stay to a close proximity to where they work and live.
When you include the telephone number association software into the picture, the authorities now have the ability to keep track on not just a person of suspect, but all who may call a specific number/s.
Your article is informative about what role government is doing to subvert the privacy of citizens. I just want to include that with current abilities by the Homeland Security Department included with RFID on a persons body, then a real-time picture of location and activity is possible, negating all privacy the Constitution supposedly assures all citizens.
by
Stanimal (2 articles, 228 quicklinks, 38 diaries, 1259 comments [234 recommended, 2 rejected]) on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 7:12:10 PM
What every Republican and many Democrats probably thought was a vote of "political expedience" -- i.e., voting for the deeply flawed FISA bill which included immunity for the telecoms -- will be seen by history as a vote of abject cowardice and betrayal to the Constitution.
Fortunately, those of us who are progressives don't have to wait for the history books to be written. We already know that!
I do have the deepest respect for and appreciation of the 28 Democratic senators who voted against FISA and immunity. This number included both my senators from Washington, Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray. That is a small bright spot in an otherwise rather dark picture.
by
Steve Elliott (11 articles, 1 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 6 comments) on Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 1:42:25 PM
(0+)
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
Must Read (0) 
Well Said (0) 
News (0) 
Touching (0) 
Funny (0) 
Supported (0) 
Interesting (0) 
Inspiring (0) 
Valuable (0) 
