Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  10
Share on Facebook
  174
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  4
188 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
40 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Pick My Poison? Don't Tell Me Nuclear is Necessary

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 8   Well Said 8   Valuable 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 3/15/11
Become a Fan
  (281 fans)

opednews.com


Since I wrote my article, Get Ready for The Nuclear Energy Spin Assault , I've had numerous people-- lefties, sock puppet nuclear energy bloggers, right wingers all tell me that we can't do without nuclear energy. They cite France!. Don't give me that nonsense. It feels like I'm being told to pick between energy arsenic or cyanide.

If you support the use of nuclear energy you are either a part of the program to sell nuclear energy or you are a success story of the nuclear energy sales program which aims to convince you and legislators that we have to do the same thing that Japan did-- build massively expensive, incredibly high risk nuclear reactors that cost ten times as much to decommission as they do to build, that have a repeate history of costing hundreds of thousands if not millions of lives.

The NY Times cites one study, done in 1997:
"...Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island described a worst-case disaster from uncovered spent fuel in a reactor cooling pool. It estimated 100 quick deaths would occur within a range of 500 miles and 138,000 eventual deaths.

The study also found that land over 2,170 miles would be contaminated and damages would hit $546 billion.

That section of the Brookhaven study focused on boiling water reactors -- the kind at the heart of the Japanese crisis."

We're talking damage costs of half a trillion dollars if the power used to pump water covering spent fuel is lost. That could be caused in the US by a power grid outage, a malware attack by something like the stuxnet worm that was used to set back the Iranian nuclear program by years, or by terrorist acts. We spend billions on TSA and homeland security to prevent terrorist attacks. What would we continue to build reactors that now have a repeat, horrible record of inflicting loss of life and huge financial costs?

Some argue that we have no choice-- that nuclear energy is our only viable option. I say that idea is a key part of the PR offensive the Nuclear energy industry is using to sell, to propagandize and even brainwash the public and legislators into believing.


The truth is there are many sustainable, renewable approaches to energy that could be developed and that are being developed in other countries, where the toxic energy corporations do not hold such political power and sway.

There are many nations where renewable energy is now or is on course to providing 40-45% of energy needs. Those nations include Canada, Brazil, Portugal, Ireland, Denmark, Britain. Of course, they do not have democracies impaired by a corrupt Supreme Court that produced the Citizens United decision that allowed the Koch brothers to plague American energy policy and literally put hundreds of thousand or more at risk. Do you consider such a statement over the top or inflammatory? Consider that Germany has just ordered a number of its oldest reactors to be shut down.

This is not one of those discussions that Fox gives "fair and balanced "coverage to, even when one side is screamingly more truthful. Well, for the American MSM, that's exactly what it's becoming. And worse, we are dealing with cultural issues here. The Japanese have a culture where saving and maintaining "face" is important. That keeps the people from questioning and challenging authority figures. It makes it more difficult, even impossible for the US department of state to even call for Americans to leave Japan for safety reasons.

We have seen enough of nuclear energy to know that it is not an acceptable source of energy.

Personally, I believe that the safest form of energy is bottom up energy. If the US issued tax credits for installing solar energy and wind energy on people's homes, buildings and businesses, then millions could get their energy directly. Some would get ALL of their energy. Some would generate more than they needed and could actually feed energy into the grid and make money. If Obama offered $36 billion in loan guarantees for people investing in renewable energy for their homes, then millions could borrow the money and recoup their investment in a short time. With smart strategies, the money could go to US manufacturers. Big energy companies, the coal mining industry and natural gas drillers would not like this. They would fight it.

There is a major impulse, on the part of legislators, to attempt to use centralized solutions, ie., big industry, single sources. We've seen again and again how too big companies and industries dominated by a few big players reduce efficiencies, dominate and control markets and enable catastrophic mistakes to occur, like the financial industry's centralized management of mortgages and credit.

There are far better, more efficient, less costly, ecologically safer ways for the US to secure reliable, steady sources of energy. There are major forces working at getting people to not even consider those options. They are engaging in PR and charm offenses to keep those options off the table, just as the private health insurance industry was so effective at keeping single payer health care off the table. My article, Get Ready for The Nuclear Energy Spin Assault discussses how this is already happening.

Just to give you a further flavor of the "spin" being applied to the nuclear meltdown story, today, the NY Times reports that radiation levels in Tokyo are now 20 times normal levels, but MSNBC, which is partially owned by General Electric, one of the largest builders of nuclear power plants, had scrolling news statements that the levels in tokyo were up slightly (I don't recall the exact words.) You be the judge whether that's an accurate "spin."

Ironically, as one commenter on my "spin" article pointed out, the oil industry benefits from blocking the production of more nuclear plants. They could be a strange bedfellow/ally in what Believe is the fight we must now wage to prevent the building of further nuclear plants and, following Germany's example, shutting down the most at risk plants.

The truth is out there. It is being mightily challenged by political and diplomatic correctness, intentional spin and outright lies by a huge industry that is facing at the best, from my perspective and the worst from theirs, total extinction. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is one agency that I'd like to see retire because it is no longer needed.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rob Kall is editor-in-chief, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, President of Futurehealth, Inc, and an inventor. He hosts the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, aired in the Metro Philly area on AM 1360, WNJC. Over 200 podcasts are archived for downloading here, or can be accessed from iTunes. Rob is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Rob Kall Wikipedia Page

Rob is, with Opednews.com the first media winner of the Pillar Award for supporting Whistleblowers and the first amendment.

See more Rob Kall articles here and, older ones, here. To learn more about Rob and OpEdNews.com, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article. For Rob's work in non-political realms mostly before 2000, see his C.V..  and here's an article on the Storycon Summit Meeting he founded and organized for eight years. Press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

Here is a one hour radio interview where Rob was a guest- on Envision This, and here is the transcript. 

To watch Rob having a lively conversation with John Conyers, then Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click hereWatch Rob speaking on Bottom up economics at the Occupy G8 Economic Summit, here.

Follow Rob on Twitter & Facebook. His quotes are here

My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Libertarian Legacy? Ron Paul's Campaign Manager, 49, Dies Uninsured, Of Pneumonia, Leaving family $400,000 Debt

Interview: McCain Fellow Hanoi Hilton POW & Naval Academy Dorm-mate; Why He Won't Vote For McCain

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
17 people are discussing this page, with 40 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The "Solar Initiative" we were promised during the... by steve windisch on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:42:29 PM
I built that one with off the shelf materials, 6% ... by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:41:28 PM
reducing fuel dependence... I believe that the va... by Stefan Thiesen on Wednesday, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:13:02 AM
I plan to have a video of that solar home up soon ... by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:52:36 AM
Could not have said it any better...thanks.... by Joanne Boyer on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:58:48 PM
that is satisfied by nuclear energy. That is to co... by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 2:11:50 PM
I personally find the first five letters of the Fu... by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:22:04 PM
but as we know, practical sense is trumped by impr... by Michael Shaw on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 2:12:06 PM
concerning Steve's comments, which I am in complet... by Michael Shaw on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 2:35:37 PM
some knee-jerk reactions actually are appropriate.... by GLloyd Rowsey on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:12:07 PM
In a day and age when we're running out of oil and... by Stuart Chisholm on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:40:55 PM
Risk of deaths exceeds 100,000. Cost-- half a tril... by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 5:20:49 PM
With all your amazing 'expertise', Stuart, I think... by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 5:38:29 PM
Now they are planning to shoot at the boiling spen... by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:06:57 AM
did you read the study info-- over 100,000 dead, h... by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:44:13 PM
I normally try not to border on the edge of the ad... by James Hadstate on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:40:54 PM
Don't we have 104 Nuclear Plants that have been op... by sbaker on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:42:23 PM
There's more to it than just the loss of human lif... by Judy Palmer on Wednesday, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:40:14 AM
It takes only 1 nuclear accident to destroy millio... by liberalsrock on Wednesday, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:55:38 AM
The nuclear energy industry lies about them. I liv... by James Hadstate on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:08:13 PM
The Niger Delta. The Amazon Basin. The Exxon Valde... by steve windisch on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 5:02:42 PM
Nuclear accidents are a common occurrence, but the... by Jim Miles on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:40:08 PM
"Risk averse" is a term that has been made perjora... by John Sanchez Jr. on Wednesday, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:44:29 AM
Here in Germany we have an ongoing very aggressive... by Stefan Thiesen on Wednesday, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:04:23 AM
God Bless Greg Palast. It's a good thing we didn't... by steve windisch on Wednesday, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:05:17 AM
You, who often call for civility at OEN, taking su... by Maxwell on Wednesday, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:17:48 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:26 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:29 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:31 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:34 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:37 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:39 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:41 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:43 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:46 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:47 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:51 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:55 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:29:58 PM
You are just another one of those talking loud mou... by Will Currey on Thursday, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:30:00 PM