Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

Phantom Threats and Other Absurdities

      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 11/20/10

- Advertisement -

President Obama is in Portugal this weekend for the NATO summit primarily to discuss the situation in Afghanistan (more on that later).

Russia, although not a member of NATO, was invited and in attendance at the conference.

Though the meeting was billed as intending on focusing on the war in Afghanistan, in a separate action, the 28 member body agreed on Friday to build a mobile anti missile defense system that is supposed to defend all NATO countries from an attack; and this with the full cooperation from the Russians.

This is an interesting development in itself as Russia just two years ago vehemently objected to any plan that would put anti ballistic missiles in Europe seeing it as a threat aimed at them. Yesterday's agreement, which had no country specifically designated as a threat, (a demand put forth by Turkey to get it to sign on) was still clearly aimed at Iran.

But even with this new agreement the projected "mobile" system, (though different than the "fixed" anti ballistic missile system offered by the Bush administration that would have had missiles in Poland and radar in the Czech Republic) which could to be moved as necessary (as well as to be at sea) there are facts that pointedly expose the fallacy of any type of anti ballistic missile system namely:

1.        There can be no anti ballistic missile system developed (fixed or mobile, now or ever) that can defend against   the multiple, independently targeted, reentry vehicle (MIRV) that is in today's nuclear arsenal of all countries that possess nuclear weapons. The whole idea of developing MIRV's was that they couldn't be deterred once launched. A MIRV is essentially multiple war heads that separate from the initial rocket after its launch that is designed to overwhelm any anti missile defense system so even if one offensive missile could be intercepted (which in tests under perfect conditions has proven unreliable and unsuccessful in taking out even one missile) multiple war heads would still hit the target. MIRV's were behind the nuclear standoff that became known as MAD (mutually assured destruction) that served as the primary deterrent in the "Cold War" between the U.S. and the USSR. It is the reason there has been no nuclear war. [1] With MIRV's there can be no anti missile system that can succeed.

2.        Iran has no nuclear weapons. Iran has conventional missiles that are capable only of carrying conventional weapons. So there is no nuclear threat, imminent or otherwise, coming from Iran.

So what NATO has done is have an agreement on an anti ballistic missile system that can never succeed against a threat that doesn't exist.

- Advertisement -

That is the absurdity that was reached yesterday. Then let's add in the absurdity of NATO, whose main reason for being (deterring an attack by the USSR) ended when that country ceased to exist with its demise in 1991, thus unceremoniously ending the Cold War.

Finally there's the absurdity of fighting a war in Afghanistan by the U.S. and NATO against an enemy (al Qaida) that no longer has a presence in the country that has morphed into a war against an indigenous foe (the Taliban) that mainly fights against us and NATO because of the occupation of its country.

So in summary, beyond the "theatrics" in Portugal this weekend, what there is in reality is a meeting of an organization that has no purpose for being (no USSR) agreeing on something that cannot work (an anti ballistic missile system) fighting in a war where the enemy (al Qaida) no longer reside. Hmm!

Absurdity has to do with something nonsensical, preposterous, futile, ridiculous et al.

Sadly, that's the charade we're witnessing in Lisbon this weekend.      

- Advertisement -


[1] It is fully acknowledged that a world without any nuclear weapons is what is needed. But until the world comes to its senses and eliminates the scourge of these weapons "MAD" remains the operable deterrent against the unthinkable.

 

dglefc22733@aol.com

Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
... by Vaikunthanath Kaviraj on Monday, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:44:34 PM