Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
September 15, 2009 at 06:54:22

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 9/15/09:

Obama's New, Improved Leech Therapy

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By The Pen (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: thepen - Writer

We are no happier with our take on President Obama's health care speech to Congress and the nation than maybe you will be. But it's a perspective the other advocacy groups you are hearing from may be too wimpy to give you. And at the end of the day, that is why you are on THIS distribution list, to hear the real scoop on what's going on. So it is still a call to action, and action is what we must always take if we want something better.

Obama's New "Improved" Leech Therapy
The sheer sappiness, even from progressives, of most of the commentary we've heard in the aftermath of President Obama's address to Congress this week on health care is truly breathtaking. Now we are going to tell you what really happened last Wednesday night.

The first thing we need to understand is that Obama HAS NO PLAN, at least not one that he will publicly disclose, otherwise he would put forward a particular bill and say, "This is what I want Congress to pass." Instead, what he did the other night was embrace a hodge podge of half-baked congressional proposals, all of which have ONE purpose and singular directive ... to NOT curtail in any way the usurous profit margins of the existing health care industry.


Worse yet, he went out of his way to SMEAR the one proposal that would actually make a meaningful difference, to institute a single payer system, like any of the ones which have been so successful in every other major industrial country. Indeed, what was so incredibly conspicuous by its absence was the fact that, while he dedicated a large part of his speech to debunking the lies being told about health care reform, there was not a word about the heinous and slanderous lies being told about single payer, namely that it is not working in all these other countries or that people there are not happy with their single payer systems.

Instead he stabbed single payer in the back by trying to characterize it as "radical change". This is EXACTLY the same tactic that right wing propagandists have deployed against any proposal Obama himself might make that would be even slightly worthwhile. Remember last month when every right wing Republican magically had the same expression, "risky experiment", coming out of their mouths all at the same moment. Same tactic from Obama, same dishonestly slanted demagoguery, and you'd have to be a serious hardcore Obama moonie not to see it. Obama literally played single payer advocates in the Congressional audience for suckers.

There was a mini uproar when a lunatic fringe Republican house member committed the offense of being in contempt for yelling out, "You lie," when Obama asserted that bills in consideration would exclude illegal aliens, even though that part was probably true. But what about when Obama said that they would consider the best ideas for reform? What kind of a lie was that, when the best idea of all, single payer, the approach favored by a majority of the American people when they are asked, the only change that would make an actual meaningful difference, has been pushed so far off the table that it is not even to be given serious consideration?

Funding of the health care system in America is the 21st century counterpart of leech therapy. We have a massive medical insurance "industry", the function of which is to "manufacture" senseless and unnecessary paperwork to generate outrageous profits for itself, in excess of 30 percent of every health care dollar, sucking the very life blood out of our economy. THAT is the problem, and yet all Obama wants to talk about is building on "what works".

NOTHING about the way we pay for our health care today works, except maybe for medical mega-corporation CEOs reaping their obscene salaries and bonuses. For THEM it works just fine, and they want to keep it just like it is. For the rest of us it is an unmitigated disaster, a veritable Katrina for our whole economy, and nothing Obama said the other night was intended to change anything of substance about it.

Remember in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina when George Bush got up on TV with the misleading rap Karl Rove put in his mouth, talking about how they were going to study "What went wrong, and what went right", complete with cute synchronized hand gestures, as if ANYTHING went right. Nothing went right about the federal response to that cataclysm. And there is nothing worth building on top of the way insurance companies are currently gouging the American people.

So when Obama talks about the government creating an "insurance market", all he is really talking about is making the government the COERCIVE SALES AGENT for the medical insurance leeches. What is the need for creating such a thing? Don't we already have a market where people can shop for the plan they like? Isn't it called the "free" market? So the only difference they are talking about is creating a compulsive mandate, backed by fines if you don't buy one of the provided choices, to FORCE you to buy essentially the same overpriced insurance you couldn't afford last week, or to have taxpayers subsidize the difference.

Sure, the hideously egregious insurance industry practices of denying coverage in every possible unjustified way needs to be outlawed. This should have been done decades ago. But what Obama is talking about is trading the one dollar we would get back in our pockets that way, for license for the same corporate greed heads to take TWO dollars back out with their other hand, by hooking up a catheter direct to the U.S. public treasury, for hardship cases who cannot possibly cough up the required insurance ransom. Net result, even more outrageous profits, not less, for the same culprits we have now, and at taxpayer expense!!

The reason why the Congressional Budget office predicts that only 5% would participate in the so-called "public option" they are talking about is because it would not save us any actual money, so it would have minimal participation. This is even assuming it would ever kick in at all, with them trying to trick it up with triggers and such, so it would NOT provide any real "competition" day one or day 730. It is being conceived of as the weakest possible alternative, a kind of welfare option for those who can prove they are totally destitute already, just the way the insurance industry wants us all to be eventually.

A real single payer system would give we the people, we who need and have a RIGHT as citizens to the health care we deserve, real power to negotiate favorable prices for our health care services.

And THAT is the LAST thing those exploiting us now would ever voluntarily allow. And Obama and too many members of Congress are in league with the medical industry devils, bought off, paid off, or just naively backing off, making deals behind our backs and then announcing them as "done" deals, and giving speeches to try to bamboozle the American people into thinking they are getting real substantive reform when in fact they are not.

What Obama did more than anything else last Wednesday night was throw down the gauntlet to US, standing in the way of real single payer reform. He said as bluntly as possible, for those with ears to hear, that if you want single payer you will have to fight HIM, to go through HIM. For his real constituents in this are NOT YOU, they are the medical industry special interests, in that way just like George Bush served only the upper class, and we might as well face up to it now. Because for him to even suggest that a silly new insurance "market" would give you as a medical care consumer any negotiating leverage comparable to single payer, with each of us out there still forced to bargain all alone by ourselves, is absurdity on steroids.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

internet activist with the mission of generating as many policy messages to Congress as possible

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Corporations Insurance Health Care"
Health Insurance: The Trade-Off Between Risk Pooling and Moral Hazard, December 1989 (Rand Corporation//Rand Report)
by Willard G. Manning

$7.50
Lowest New Price $272.69

Number of pages: 60
Publisher: RAND Corporation

Demand for Supplementary Health Insurance (Rand Corporation//Rand Report)
by M. Susan Marquis

$4.00

Number of pages: 37
Publisher: Rand Corp

Measuring Health Perceptions in the Health Insurance Experiment (Rand Corporation//Rand Report)
by Allyson Ross Davies

$10.00

Number of pages: 126
Publisher: Rand Corp

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

"Public Option" and the Risk of Reform through Regulation by Bob F on Tuesday, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:39:24 AM
Water Usually Runs Downhill by Jason Paz on Tuesday, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:02:59 PM
Obama - Snake Oil Salesman - Corporate Tool by 911TRUTH on Tuesday, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:50:42 PM
Billionaires for Wealthcare by 911TRUTH on Tuesday, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:10:55 PM
flexcin by buba rae on Wednesday, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:29:54 AM
My Sentiments Precisely by Herbert Calhoun on Wednesday, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:04:17 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum