Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 3/4/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (21 comments)

Obama and the Dems Take Step in Right Direction with Reconciliation, while GOP Talking Points Aim to Scare Blue Dogs

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (193 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

As
a vocal critic of president Obama, I have to give him credit when it's
due. Yesterday, Obama made it clear that he'd drawn a line and reached a
point where he was moving forward with his health care plan, with or
without the Republican party.

This is a decisive, strong
leadership move. It's coming late, but better late than never.

The
Democrats are seriously talking about using reconciliation, something
which Harry Reid seemed to have taken off the table for far too long.
That's good too. They could do better. When Jim Bunning filibustered
unemployment funding, Harry Reid should have jumped in and used
reconciliation to pass the funding. That would have set a tone, showing
that reconciliation could cut through gridlock and get things done.


Reconciliation
has been used close to two dozen times in recent years, more by
Republicans than Democrats. Harry Reid should break that record and show
he has the power and the courage and leadership skills to use it. It
might just salvage his re-election.

Between now and the November
elections, Reid and the senate Democrats should use reconciliation
every chance they get. Let the Mitch McConnell whine about each one
while the Democrats call him a hypocrite and remind the voters how Bush
passed his tax breaks and how COBRA, health care for children, even
medicare were passed using reconciliation.

The truth is, the
recent Republican talking points have not been aimed at the public.
They've been aimed at blue dog Democrats, with the goal of scaring them
into going against the wave the democratic party has stirred up.
Republicans are all saying the same thing-- that the health care bill
will bankrupt the US, that it takes half a trillion dollars from
medicare and that the majority of Americans don't want it.


Mitch
McConnell says that if, by the odd chance it passes, the health reform
vote will be THE issues that Republicans will use to run against
incumbents. That's a threat to bluedogs.

So here's the deal. The
reform bill is a disappointment to many who want real reform. It fails
to deliver a public option. I've written extensively about just how far
from the "REAL THING" it actually is. But, at this point, if the
Democrats want to hold their advantage in the house and senate, this is
what they need to do. If the do the RIGHT thing, they'll take away
immunity from monopoly laws. They'll include legislation that allows
states to pass single payer legislation, and even better, provide
funding for state feasibility studies.

If they're really smart,
they'll throw in medicare for pregnant mothers and force Republicans to
vote against a life affirming amendment that expands medicare outside of
the senior realm. This will break the ice and set a legislative precedent for expanding medicare.

There are ways to use the current legislation
to soften and even break through elements of resistance to single
payer, ways to start building the foundation to the next round of
legislation. I give Arlen Specter credit for being one of the first to
talk about using reconciliation to pass health care reform-- he did so
at the Pennsylvania progressive summit meeting. If he's smart, he and
his opponent, Joe Sestak, will push for medicare for pregnant mothers as
a way to prevent abortion. That would pull the rug out from under the
Republican candidate, Pat Toomey.

Obama made a good move
yesterday. There is a long list of disappointing decisions he's made
that must still be held against him and his number one, Rahm Emanuel.

The verdict is not yet in on the Obama presidency, not by a long shot.
But at least, when he gets something right, even his detractors on the
left should give him credit. If he shows more strength, more willingness
to be a strong leader, there's incredible possibility for what he can
accomplish. Personally, I think he needs to dump Rahm Emanuel, a tough
guy who has, with his constant conciliation to right wingers, made Obama
appear to be very weak and ineffective.

Obama should dump
Emanuel and start talking to Van Jones, to Bernie Sanders, to Marcy
Kaptur and Alan Grayson. These are people with guts and the courage to
take strong stands.

The Democratic party is showing signs of
life, in the leadership and courage department-- not enough to give
Obama a pass, not by any means. But it's a beginning.

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey, Positive Psychology, Stress, Biofeedback and a wide range of subjects. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. He recently retired as organizer of several conferences, including StoryCon, the Summit Meeting on the Art, Science and Application of Story and The Winter Brain Meeting on neurofeedback, biofeedback, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology. See more of his articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about me and OpEdNews.com, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article.

And there are Rob's quotes, here.

To Watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video

My radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at www.wnjc1360.com

Rob also host a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at futurehealth.org/podcasts

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.
-While I'm registered as a Democrat, I consider myself to be a dynamic critic of the Democratic party, just as, well, not quite as much, but almost as much as I am a critic of republicans.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Recent press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
21 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The prohibition of federal funding for abortions by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:13:20 AM
no change by Rob Kall on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:19:57 AM
Congressman Stupack by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:41:42 AM
Abortion already government-funded by Gustav Wynn on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:15:54 PM
Rob, I think you're missing the point by Steve Blank on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:09:39 AM
a lot of truth in all you say by Rob Kall on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:28:32 AM
Reconciliation or no, it is still a bad bill by Jerry Policoff on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:28:30 AM
Insuring more federal control! by Randy Rinaldo on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:56:44 AM
fundamental issue of ecconomic compliance by Randy Rinaldo on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:31:57 AM
How Does This Help? by arlen custer on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:47:10 AM
I want to argue positive too by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:59:55 AM
The bill has secret funding for the military by Matt Stouler on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:15:31 AM
Low Expectations by arlen custer on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:51:04 AM
correct by Davey Jones on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:31:17 PM
Not enough but definitely a step in the right direction by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:07:57 PM
Uh,uh by Jerry Policoff on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:22:19 PM
To Pass this Bill or not... by Gustav Wynn on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:10:21 PM
I would also note by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:21:39 PM
IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES by Blaine Kinsey on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:08:27 PM
The bill is humongously unpopular by Perry Logan on Friday, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:55:14 AM
It is a dillemma there's no doubt about it by Michael Shaw on Saturday, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:06:40 PM