Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 2/13/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (10 comments)

O'Reilly refuses apology for Helen Thomas remarks

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By Ellen at NewsHounds  Posted by Rady Ananda (about the submitter)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

After Bill O'Reilly was criticized by Media Matters and The Women's Media Center for his sexist and ageist attacks on veteran journalist Helen Thomas, he invited WMC's Courtney Martin on his show where he barely let her speak and refused to apologize. 

Bill O'Reilly Blames Liberals (and Media Matters in Particular) for His Refusal to Apologize to Helen Thomas

Not surprisingly, there has been some media fallout after the mean-spirited attacks on Helen Thomas earlier in the week on The O'Reilly Factor. 


But instead of just admitting he had been a pinhead for making a boorish imitation of Thomas as the Wicked Witch of the East, O'Reilly blamed liberal groups and liberal hypocrisy for his refusal to apologize. O'Reilly obsessed about Thomas throughout his show last night (2/11/09). He also obsessed about Media Matters whom he blamed for the entire backlash (overlooking my own role, I'm sorry to say). O'Reilly wanted to send them a cake with "something inside." Bernard Goldberg, who had also made a mean-spirited joke about Thomas, suggested sending black, dead roses. With video.

I hate to be an armchair psychologist but it was pretty clear O'Reilly knew he was wrong but didn't want to admit it because he didn't want to give Media Matters (and moi, I'm sure) the satisfaction.

O'Reilly devoted his Talking Points Memo to the burning issue of Thomas and Media Matters. O'Reilly described Media Matters as "guttersnipes," and said the organization "routinely assassinates the characters of conservatives and Republicans... hoping to harm people with whom they disagree."

"I poked a little fun at Helen," O'Reilly said, by way of characterizing his cawing imitation of a witch and the suggestion that Barack Obama should have poured water on the 88-year-old veteran correspondent.

O'Reilly complained that after Media Matters publicized his "little fun," it was "picked up by the far left fringe." That's presumably me, since I also posted about the incident and my post was cited by Bonnie Erbe, in her blog for US News & World Report. Erbe's bio is right on her blog. She's a contributing editor at US News & World Report, she hosts a weekly PBS television show and she's a syndicated columnist for Scripps Howard News Service. That's pretty mainstream.

But Erbe had the clarity to call O'Reilly's remarks hateful so, apparently, that was reason enough to categorize her, along with Adam Moss of New York Magazine as the "far left fringe" of society that was somehow in cahoots with Media Matters.

Enter The Women's Media Center which found O'Reilly's comments sexist and ageist and sent out a press release urging people to send an official complaint to FOX News. After his Talking Points Memo, O'Reilly's first guest last night was Courtney Martin, of The Women's Media Center. FOX News called their video of the discussion (below) "Liberal Lunacy."

O'Reilly was obviously hoping that Martin would soothe his sore ego. In his mind, The Women's Media Center had been somehow hoodwinked by Media Matters (or was it Erbe? Or both?) into believing that O'Reilly had done anything objectionable. He said, "Now, I could have attacked Helen Thomas, called her a pin head, said that she shouldn't be there, said she was past her game. I could have been serious about it and really demeaned the woman and I would have been in my rights because Helen Thomas uses her platform, as a columnist for Hearst, to just brutalize anybody she disagrees with. Now, I could have done that and I chose not to. So I think I'm a nice guy."

But Martin was there to have a serious discussion, not to schmooze. "This woman deserves our respect," she told O'Reilly.

"Why? She just accused the United States of murdering innocent people. Why should I respect her?" O'Reilly asked, "She's 88, right? Does that mean I can't make fun of her, cause she's 88?"

Then, when he realized Martin was neither going to assuage his conscience nor collapse under his debating prowess, O'Reilly began to lose his temper and accused Martin of being part of some left-wing conspiracy. "Where were YOU when Sarah Palin was getting the hell kicked out of her? You didn't say a word."

O'Reilly started yelling and pointing his finger: "You guys are hypocrites. You guys are phonies. You guys are being used by the left to do this nonsense... If you had defended Sarah Palin, then I would respect you and I would say, 'You know, you were right. Maybe I should apologize.' But you didn't! This is a left-wing play. That's what this is."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

O'Reilly = so what? by William Whitten on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:50:58 AM
Let them eat cake! by Wolfgang May on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:31:59 AM
This is how O'Reilly makes his money - you're feeding him. by John Toradze on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:54:25 AM
biting back by Rady Ananda on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:27:40 AM
Why? by Shelley Robinson on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:46:00 PM
some how I pictured.. by shirley reese on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:01:52 PM
Article is correct by Richmond Gardner on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:12:44 PM
And keep in mind... by Richmond Gardner on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:48:12 PM
Letting smears go is NOT an option by Rady Ananda on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:54:27 PM
The O'Reilly Factor = division by 0 by Dave Kisor on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:53:18 PM