OpEdNews » NAIS---PREMISES DEFINED---WHO WINS?

January 5, 2009 at 17:35:04

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 1/6/09:
NAIS---PREMISES DEFINED---WHO WINS?

by Marti Oakley (Posted by Linn Cohen-Cole) Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

SAVE FAVORITES

VIEW FAVORITES

PPJ www.ppjg.wordpress.com

Marti Oakley--Jan. 6, 2009

Democracy in Action

In what can only appear to be nothing more than a last ditch effort to eradicate all family farms and ranches, USDA has been caught repeatedly misrepresenting the voluntary National Animal Identification System and many states and groups are fighting back.

Without any approval or oversight from congress (none being needed as USDA operates as a self-regulating agency) USDA launched the NAIS with the usual bleating about [national security]. This threat was identified as the possibility that some rampant terrorist might somehow sneak some bio weapon into the country and infect a cow or corn field with some disease no doubt developed while hiding out in a cave somewhere on the other side of the world. I suppose its possible considering how insecure our borders are.

More than likely, any attack of a bio weapons nature will come from one of the hundreds of bio labs now operating right here at home. The US is the most prolific producer of bio weapons in the world and has created and designed some of the most lethal biological weapons ever to have been cultivated.

Using the usual scare tactics of terrorist attacks, NAIS was launched with the appearance of one goal in mind: eradicating family farms and ranches and establishing the complete takeover of all food producing lands and animals by huge multi-national corporations. Instrumental in this takeover is the designation of PREMISES ID, rather than property ownership.

Defining Premises within the law:

Premises, signifies a formal part of a deed; and it is made to designate an estate.

Estates:Lands and tenements when generally called premises, or when particularly spoken of as, the premises, will be sold without reserve.

Conveyancing: That part in the beginning of a deed, in which are set forth the names of the parties, with their titles and additions, and in which are recited such deeds, agreements, or matters of fact, as are necessary to explain the reasons upon which the contract then entered into is founded;

and it is here also the consideration on which it is made, is set down, and the certainty of the thing granted. The technical meaning of the premises in a deed is every thing which precedes the habendum. (http://www.lectlaw.com/

Ha'ben´dum (hå'bĕn´dŭm) n. 1. (Law) That part of a deed which follows the part called the premises, and determines the extent of the interest of estate granted. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Habendum

Premises ID when viewed as a conveyance, could be construed to mean voluntarily abandoning what you owned. You convey control of your property by signing up for Premises ID, voluntarily abandoning your control of the property and subjecting the property to the newly acquired control of the government. Simply put: you just gave away your property and any rights to control or use that property as YOU see fit. At this point, legally, the property is no longer property but rather a premises and can be sold and controlled by someone other than you without reserve.

Premises signifies a formal part of a deed as mentioned above. To designate is to name or entitle and to create an estate. A premises has no protection under the United States Constitution and allows no exclusive rights of ownership. Once you have signed onto PREMISES ID, you have put your property into a state of legal limbo and have agreed to the new status as nothing more than a tenant farmer or sharecropper. Of course you will still have to make the mortgage payments until they take it from you.

Animals belong to the owner only so long as the owner retains possession of them. Once you enter into the National Animal Identification System, you no longer legally own the animals. They are no longer under your control, but rather under the control of the USDA.

The USDA uses the term [stakeholder] to identify those who own animals, implying under the statutes and codes you are a third party interest until the legal owner can be determined. No doubt in an administrative court which administers codes and statutes, not constitutional law. [you could not access a civil, constitutionally controlled court]

UN policy of STAMPING OUT/Agenda 21 rules for controlling access to food supplies and sources.

1 | 2

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Stop NAIS entirely. Demand an investigation of corporate ties to the USDA.

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

Book Recommendations for "Agenda Animals Regulations"

National food safety agenda an APHIS perspective (SuDoc A 101.10/2:10-05-002)
by U.S. Dept of Agriculture

Number of pages:
Publisher: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?) Tell a Friend:

(More...)

3 comments

Joel Gill

Compare around the world.

We are told that Canada has a required animal ID program. It does, it is a simple metal, not RFID, tag system. The Australians were told the must enact a mandatory animal ID system (NLIS) because the US and Canada had such a system. Now we are being told the US must enact this system (NAIS)because Australia and Canada have such a system in place, we need it for health traceback and according to former Sec. of Agriculture Mike Johannes retirement address "to enhance our success in world trade.".

The Australian system has been and continues to be a dismal and costly failure as will the proposed system for the US most certainly be.

This is not about animal health or food safety, this is about control. Please reread the article and consider if ID is really needed for the health, safety, and the well being of the citizens of the US or if there is something else afoot.

by Joel Gill (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:25:16 PM

(0+)

Marti Oakley

Thank you

Lynn,

thank you for posting my article. The web address for me is incorrect....it should be www.ppjg.wordpress.com.

This NAIS program is one of the most horrible to come out of Washington.

They want to tag our animals with GPS.

73% of our crops are now genetically altered.

Cloned meats and genetically altered foods are in our stores.

We don't know where our food is coming from.

The net is closing and taking over food supply and production is only one part of it.

by Marti Oakley (27 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 84 comments [15 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:43:05 PM

(0+)

Linn Cohen-Cole

Reply: It's a great article, Marti. Thanks for letting me post it.

1.5.09 Monday about 11:01pm

I agree about the net closing and how dangerous NAIS is. Doing all I can to get word out to liberals who have not heard of it. This is a good site to reach people and Rob Kall has been wonderful about welcoming farm issues - ESPECIALLY about NAIS - so people will wake up.

"Food safety" should not be used as a means of hiding fascism. And people need to realize their farmers and access to normal food are being eliminated.

Keep writing. Keep writing.

Best wishes,

Linn

by Linn Cohen-Cole (76 articles, 1 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 189 comments [12 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:07:38 PM

(0+)