Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 1/6/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

NAIS---PREMISES DEFINED---WHO WINS?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By Marti Oakley  Posted by Linn Cohen-Cole (about the submitter)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Using the UN Agenda 21 rules the USDA has adopted, there is no requirement for the USDA to vaccinate or to quarantine sick animals. In fact, they don't even have to prove there is a real threat to the animal population, or to substantiate that any disease is present or a threat prior to stamping out entire animal populations in a six mile area surrounding the claimed infection or disease. The only requirement of the NAIS is that USDA follow UN Agenda 21 guidelines and eradicate all animal life in that area. That means every fish, bird, dog, cat, cow horse, deer, raccoon etc... every living thing is killed in its tracks. 

This isn't about food safety, animal safety or national security: this is about food access and control.

How they get away with it:

1946 Federal Administrative Procedures Act. The Administrative Procedures Act is the law which allows US Federal Agencies to create the rules and regulations they can then enforce. This Act is a subversion of constitutional government and should be repealed. It was another case of congress ceding its authority to a non-elected agency allowing the construction of codes and statutes and avoiding constitutional provisions and laws. 

Using regulations they themselves created, in essence creating laws in abeyance of congress, the USDA can also amend any of these regulations and rules at will and at any point can rewrite their own laws. http://www.archives.gov/federalregister/laws/administrative-procedure/

NAIS violates the 1st, 4th, 5th, and the 14th Amendments, suspending and substantially violating the rights of private citizens without so much as a hearing in congress, not that it would do any good. Congress has shown itself consistently to support the most un-American and anti-constitutional policies and laws ever foisted on the American public and neither party is a protector of constitutional rights.


Its difficult to know that any time we are dealing with our own government or its agencies, we must constantly be on guard for hidden agendas, the hiding of hostile intent, or the practice of [altered functions]. This means that although the thing being promoted may have a good and beneficial purpose if applied as it is marketed, an altered function which is hidden, destructive or implemented with malice can be the reality.

Kudos, to all of you out there fighting this battle to keep government from controlling our land, animals and our right to chose the foods we want to consume.

© 2008 Marti Oakley

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Stop NAIS entirely. Demand an investigation of corporate ties to the USDA.

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Compare around the world. by Joel Gill on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:25:16 PM
Thank you by Marti Oakley on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:43:05 PM
It's a great article, Marti. Thanks for letting me post it. by Linn Cohen-Cole on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:07:38 PM