NAIS---PREMISES DEFINED---WHO WINS?

SAVE AS FAVORITE

VIEW FAVORITES

By Marti Oakley, Posted by Linn Cohen-Cole (about the submitter) Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com Permalink

UN policy of STAMPING OUT/Agenda 21 rules for controlling access to food supplies and sources.

Using the UN Agenda 21 rules the USDA has adopted, there is no requirement for the USDA to vaccinate or to quarantine sick animals. In fact, they don't even have to prove there is a real threat to the animal population, or to substantiate that any disease is present or a threat prior to stamping out entire animal populations in a six mile area surrounding the claimed infection or disease. The only requirement of the NAIS is that USDA follow UN Agenda 21 guidelines and eradicate all animal life in that area. That means every fish, bird, dog, cat, cow horse, deer, raccoon etc... every living thing is killed in its tracks.

This isn't about food safety, animal safety or national security: this is about food access and control.

How they get away with it:

1946 Federal Administrative Procedures Act. The Administrative Procedures Act is the law which allows US Federal Agencies to create the rules and regulations they can then enforce. This Act is a subversion of constitutional government and should be repealed. It was another case of congress ceding its authority to a non-elected agency allowing the construction of codes and statutes and avoiding constitutional provisions and laws.

Using regulations they themselves created, in essence creating laws in abeyance of congress, the USDA can also amend any of these regulations and rules at will and at any point can rewrite their own laws. http://www.archives.gov/federalregister/laws/administrative-procedure/

NAIS violates the 1st, 4th, 5th, and the 14th Amendments, suspending and substantially violating the rights of private citizens without so much as a hearing in congress, not that it would do any good. Congress has shown itself consistently to support the most un-American and anti-constitutional policies and laws ever foisted on the American public and neither party is a protector of constitutional rights.

Its difficult to know that any time we are dealing with our own government or its agencies, we must constantly be on guard for hidden agendas, the hiding of hostile intent, or the practice of [altered functions]. This means that although the thing being promoted may have a good and beneficial purpose if applied as it is marketed, an altered function which is hidden, destructive or implemented with malice can be the reality.

Kudos, to all of you out there fighting this battle to keep government from controlling our land, animals and our right to chose the foods we want to consume.

© 2008 Marti Oakley

1 | 2

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Stop NAIS entirely. Demand an investigation of corporate ties to the USDA.

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

Book Recommendations for "Agenda Animals Regulations"

National food safety agenda an APHIS perspective (SuDoc A 101.10/2:10-05-002)
by U.S. Dept of Agriculture

Number of pages:
Publisher: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service