Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
November 12, 2009 at 17:30:28

Must Read 8   Well Said 5   Valuable 4   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 11/12/09:

Myths of Our Time

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Paul Craig Roberts (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Paul Craig Roberts - Writer

Morality vs. Material Interests

It is conventional wisdom that it was the draft that ended the Vietnam war. According to this explanation, cowardly college students subject to the draft and their unpatriotic families, forced an end to the war. This is Karl Marx's explanation. Material interests, not empty morality, are said to have brought the war to an end.

That fact that in those days the US still had an independent media of sorts that sometimes framed the war in moral terms is ignored. Are we sure, for example, that the film of the naked little girl running in terror down the road burning with napalm was ineffectual in arousing moral opposition to the war? Are we certain that it wasn't an aroused moral conscience that brought about the end of the war but was college students' fears for their lives and limbs?

If we ascribe ending the war to material interests, it makes ending the war look as unworthy as the war itself.

Yet, virtually every conservative columnist, commentator, newsperson and politician, as well as today's antiwar protesters and apparently the Pentagon, believes that a military draft would reduce Americans' toleration for wars because of body bags coming home to middle and upper class parents. Apparently, the lower class doesn't mind its kids coming back in body bags.

Those in thrall to this explanation, which derives from Marx's materialist explanation of history, do not notice that Vietnam was our longest war. It apparently took almost forever for the material interest of students and their parents to realize itself and stop the war.

Why are we afraid to say that the war stopped because American troops and the American population got tired, offended even, from killing women, children and noncombatants? Vietnam had not attacked the US. The US had interjected itself into a civil war in a far off place, as it has done in Afghanistan.

By invading Iraq the US started a civil war between Sunni and Shi'ite. In Pakistan the US has started a civil war between the religious tribal population and the secular US puppet state. In Palestine the US started a civil war between Fatah and Hamas.

One continuously reads from those Americans opposed to America's wars of aggression that the wars are possible because they don't affect Americans, just those few who sign up for the voluntary military. Thus, there are insufficient material interests at stake to stop the war. This is a common explanation for the weakness of the antiwar movement.

One could argue instead that it is the triumph of Karl Marx's materialist thinking that has made moral protests impotent. What is morality? You can't weigh it, define it, measure it. It can be dismissed as the whining of material interests. In contrast, material interests, such as lives, limbs, and bank accounts are real.

For whatever the reason, morality has shown itself to be an impotent force in 21st century America. Americans show no remorse at over one million dead Iraqis and four million displaced Iraqis due entirely to an American invasion based on lies and deception. The lies and deception are now well proven. Yet, there has been no apology for the horrors that Americans inflicted on Iraq.

Afghanistan is another example. Intentional lies conflated the Taliban with al Qaeda and "terrorists." The diverse peoples in Afghanistan who were first ravaged by Soviet bombs are now ravaged by American bombs. Weddings, funerals, children's soccer games, people waiting for fuel or food, people asleep in their homes, people attending Mosques have all been murdered and are murdered routinely by US and its NATO puppets.

Each time civilians are murdered, the US denies it, only to be contradicted every time by the evidence.

Why is the president of the United States contemplating sending yet tens of thousands more US troops to kill people in Afghanistan?

The answer is that the United States is an immoral country, with an immoral people and an immoral government. Americans no longer have a moral conscience. They have gone over to the Dark Side.

Humanity has endeavored for millennia to control evil with morality. In the American "superpower," this effort has collapsed and failed.

The United States needs to be censured for its immoral behavior, not have that behavior rationalized as being in its material interests.


 

Paul Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, has held numerous academic appointments. He has been reporting shocking cases of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. A new (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Afghanistan Deception"
Mass Casualties: A Young Medic's True Story of Death, Deception, and Dishonor in Iraq
by Michael Anthony

$22.95
Lowest New Price $5.99

Number of pages: 256
Publisher: Adams Media

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
28 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Myths of Our Time by Janet Loughrey on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:14:37 PM
domestic war crimes by gone on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:55:24 PM
Welcome... by Bia Winter on Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:26:42 PM
Grim reality by Marika on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:49:39 AM
Militarist Masturbation by Ed Encho on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:43:27 AM
It's not forever by Oh on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:25:23 AM
The Americans and their moral consciences....... by Ernest on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:04:01 AM
I loved this article! by Oh on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:53:31 AM
The article is excellent by Mark Sashine on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:09:39 AM
Historical materialism by paul roberts on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:30:54 AM
Mr. Roberts by Mark Sashine on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:43:13 AM
MR. ROBERTS by WML on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:18:05 PM
The Church was lost by Richard Pietrasz on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:51:17 PM
LOL by Oh on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:22:08 PM
Friedman by Richard Pietrasz on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:57:12 PM
Naomi Klein by paul roberts on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:07:42 PM
Excellent point made here by Nick van Nes on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:42:36 AM
I'd like to point out by Philip Pease on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:54:37 AM
Who Matters? by PrMaine on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:32:42 PM
Lower class needs by Bia Winter on Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:13:05 PM
Myth busting by R. A. Landbeck on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:17:35 PM
I wouldn't be so quick to throw out religion by Oh on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:51:33 PM
RELIGION by Bia Winter on Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:19:33 PM
The whole idea of morality by Archie on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:19:01 PM
Excellent observation by Oh on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:00:02 PM
Not all the US is immoral by Richard Pietrasz on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:04:53 PM
The 'Myth" is that we are not caught in an EMPIRE by Alan MacDonald on Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:52:55 PM
Right ON, Alan, by Bia Winter on Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:25:00 PM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum