Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  6
Share on Facebook
  20
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  2
28 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
11 comments, In Series: The Money Party

OpEdNews Op Eds

Michael Collins: Questions for The Money Party -- Why Negative Job Growth for 11 Years?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Supported 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 6/22/11
Become a Fan
  (105 fans)

opednews.com


The Money Party is a very small group of enterprises and individuals who control almost all of the money and power in the United States.  They use their money and power to make more money and gain more power. It's not about Republicans versus Democrats.  The Money Party is an equal opportunity employer. It has no permanent friends or enemies, just permanent interests. Democrats are as welcome as Republicans to this party. It's all good when you're on the take and the take is legal. Economic Populist

Negative job growth for eleven years is the best evidence concerning our economic troubles.  There were 135 million jobs in 2000 for a workforce of 144 million.  Today, there are 139 million jobs for a workforce of 154 million.  That represents negative job growth when you factor in population growth.

Job growth in this economy hit a dead calm in 2000 and is now moving backwards.  If the issue isn't raised, how can we address the phenomena?

What is the Money Party doing about Negative Job Growth?

The solutions offered by congressional Republicans are packed with their favorite programs (House and Senate versions).  Unfortunately, their proposals don't have much to do with increasing jobs.

The first recommendation calls for the federal government to "start living within [its] means."  How does that happen?  Pass a constitutional amendment for a balanced budget and  put the budget process in a "straight jacket" through fixed spending limits.  We are told that this will "cut spending to immediately and substantially reduce deficits."  The Republicans fail to mention how many jobs will be created.

Their program makes rules on spending but, with one exception, it neglects to mention any specific programs that should be cut.  Guess which program they mentioned?  Their manifesto suggests that we must "control entitlement spending",  Social Security for example.  How convenient.  They cite the one program running a substantial surplus, the lifeline for seniors.

The Republican jobs program eliminates all those regulations they love to hate.  Generating more jobs by eliminating regulations is laughable. Since 2001, rules and regulations for business (e.g., Wall Street) have been tossed overboard at a record pace.  No new jobs were created during this period.  The collapse of 2008 and the Great Recession that followed are the main effect of eliminating regulations.

It is no surprise that Republicans want big tax breaks corporations.  Their corporate welfare proposals are the new "trickle down" economics.  Just give the giant corporations one more round of tax breaks and, as if by magic, they will start creating jobs.

They propose a 10 point reduction in the current corporate tax rate (from the current 35% to 25%.  They claim that it would produce 5.3 million jobs.  That's 053 million jobs for each point taxes are cut.  If the Republican's plan to collect the proposed 25% rate, that's actually an eight point increase over the 17% rates those corporations actually pay right now.  By their own logic, their proposal will cause 4.24 million jobs to disappear (8 point increase times.53 million jobs per point). Mission accomplished!

The Democrats job plan continues their sleepwalking through history.  Keep in mind that the Democrats controlled Congress from 2008 to 2010.  They did a lot for jobs on Wall Street but not much for the rest of us.

The Democratic stimulus plan of 2009 produced some jobs.  Nearly a third of the $800 billion proposal went to tax cuts.  The remaining $500 million offered a modest program at a time of great crisis.

Current proposals by the party offer programs that are a fraction of their 2009 stimulus package.  They are  hardly adequate.  They say closing corporate tax loopholes, moving toward a green economy, and fixing infrastructure (on the cheap) will do the trick.  Democrats are also fixated on balancing the budget.  They had legislative control for four years, with concurrent presidential control for the last two of those years.  They could not or would not create the conditions necessary for job growth.

Both parties go on ad nauseum about job training and make the compulsory references to community colleges as the key element.  Community colleges are outstanding resources.  They need more funding.  But the notion that there is a skills gap between the employees and available jobs was totally debunked by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  A recent BLS revision of its new jobs data showed that all those new jobs simply don't exist.

Neither party addresses the ravages of free trade.  They talk about export growth but forget the reciprocal, friendly free trade deals plus the import of skilled professionals that end jobs here while creating them over there.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

http://www.opednews.com/author/author3863.html

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

The Pennsylvania Sexual Assault Scandal, the Second Mile Foundation, and Penn State

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Michael,I love you. Pink Floyd (et al) explain... by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:04:22 AM
You keep it up.  We're all in the same sinkin... by Michael Collins on Wednesday, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:31:21 PM
from Iraq and Afghanistan, will they have jobs wai... by msedano on Wednesday, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:33:49 AM
Bring them home, now  That's protecting the t... by Michael Collins on Wednesday, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:43:47 PM
short video by the Yes Men.  The first 2 minu... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Wednesday, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:49:17 AM
the poor, see this short video.It's too bad that t... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Wednesday, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:07:56 PM
That's just perfect, the whole thing.  What a... by Michael Collins on Thursday, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:00:12 AM
In 2011 we witness ample evidence of executives a... by william czander on Wednesday, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:09:26 PM
You're onto the problem the money boys face (see g... by Michael Collins on Thursday, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:05:18 AM
It's just like the old joke about mind over matter... by Nathan Herkowitz on Wednesday, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:37:18 PM
If you haven't got a job, it's a Depression, and e... by Nancy Lewis on Thursday, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:53:38 AM