Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 9   Well Said 4   Valuable 4   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 6/23/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (50 comments)

Methane Bubble Earthquake Volcano in the Gulf?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (193 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com



There's been a viral message spreading over the web that there's a life and earth threatening methane bubble in the gulf, caused by the gushing well, which will explode and even cause an earthquake and a real volcano, in some versions of the story. Some accuse Obama of hiding nefarious goings on.

Things are bad enough in the gulf. There's a real, genuine disaster of historic proportions. We don't need new tin-foil hat conspiracy theories.

Tinfoil hat and volcano image mashup by rob kall
flickr source images: tinfoil hat lady by amanky volcano bykahunapulej

I suspected the veracity of this report, only found on obscure websites and youtube videos. I checked with some experts who have proven to have provided reliable information on the well disaster in the past. The uniform response has been that this methane bubble story is urban legend nonsense. So let's nip it in the bud with some reality.



Yes there is a lot of methane gas. That doesn't mean there's a giant bubble waiting to explode and set off an earthquake or volcanic eruption. It DOES mean that huge amounts of methane are in the water and entering the atmosphere. And methane causes 20 to 70 times the greenhouse gas effect that CO2 does, according to wikipedia. Also, methane decreases Oxygen in the water, making it harder for life in the ocean to survive. Add to that the oil eating bacteria using up oxygen and the risk for dead zones increase. This is serious stuff, but not at all validating the methane bubble narrative.

I have already reported that the situation with the well is very bad-- that probably, a gas explosion, possibly methane, in the well, caused damage up and down the well, possibly breaking the casing, causing leaks throughout the well. That is believed to be the reason the "top kill" failed. Mud was coming out from multiple leak locations. It is also the reason that the relief wells, being drilled so that a "bottom kill" can be attempted-- again, injecting mud into the well to seal it-- will not work because of breaks in the casing.

Part of the reason there are breaks in the casing is because BP chose to use the cheaper option for casing, saving a few million dollars. Then they skimped on spacers used in well sealing process that Haliburton was contracted to do. Haliburton accepted this sub-standard situation and did the work anyway. That added to the risk that the well was never sealed properly to begin with. We don't know all the facts because the mudlogs have not been released which would tell us details.

We do know that weeks before the explosion that sank the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, a worker reporter that there was a hydraulic leak in the BOP that was the safety device that was supposed to close the well in the case of an emergency. The hydraulic fluid was needed to enable the BOP to cut through the well pipe and seal it. Apparently BP failed to address the problem.


First, here's the response I received from my anonymous (I do know who it is but am protecting his job) source in BP:

Here's what I asked him: "There's talk that there's a giant methane gas bubble waiting to explode and start a volcano and earthquakes in the gulf. What's your take? " He replied:
There is no 'cavern' under the Gulf. How are caverns formed? By water dissolving limestone. Over a huge period of time. Above water. I don't know the geology of the oil-bearing rock, but if it were limestone, those drills would be progressing a whole lot faster. Also, if you drill into the top of a cavern, then it is IMPOSSIBLE to cement a well. Remember how that's done? They shoot cement out the bottom and it flows up between the wall and the outside of the well casing. A cavern would mean that there was no wall.

There is no huge gas volcano ready to come forth. It's true that this well is 40% gas by volume, and that the average is 5%, but that's just more doomsday crap from conspiracy nuts.

While the reservoir is around 400-450F, and 13,000 psi, there's no 'bubble', unless you consider an entire underground geology to be a bubble. The thing is permeable rock, not a cavern.

At most, with a huge hole in the ground, it could probably flow 600K bbl/day - but no volcano.

And - if by 'explode', you meant 'ignite', then I'd ask where the ignition source is? Even if it started flowing at the max, no fire on the surface is going to traverse to the bottom; fire requires oxygen.

Earthquakes - if the well opened up 100%, then - eventually, some of the structure might collapse and cause an minor earthquake - but that's doubtful. Generally, as you pump, the land subsides - a very quiet event. Earthquakes happen when drillers inject hot water or whatever to crack the rock and bring oil or gas out more quickly, and then that's only because natural faults get lubricated. Denver had a bunch of these in the 70's (I was there for them). No big deal.

Much ado about nothing, really."

I also asked geologist Chris Landau, who has experience with drilling. He replied,
As far as the bubble is concerned. I say no. If I am wrong, all I can say is I learnt something. Is it not good to be wrong at least once per day. My reasoning follows.

Two links you might want to save to get quick details on how deep the next earthquake is that makes the news and how strong it is. We have a 7 on the richter scale, somewhere in the world every 10 days.

1961 earthquakes of 2.5 on the richter scale or greater in the last week around the USA, Alaska,Hawaii, Puerto Rico. None in the Gulf. See interactive map from the United States Geological Survey site

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey, Positive Psychology, Stress, Biofeedback and a wide range of subjects. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. He recently retired as organizer of several conferences, including StoryCon, the Summit Meeting on the Art, Science and Application of Story and The Winter Brain Meeting on neurofeedback, biofeedback, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology. See more of his articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about me and OpEdNews.com, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article.

And there are Rob's quotes, here.

To Watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video

My radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at www.wnjc1360.com

Rob also host a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at futurehealth.org/podcasts

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.
-While I'm registered as a Democrat, I consider myself to be a dynamic critic of the Democratic party, just as, well, not quite as much, but almost as much as I am a critic of republicans.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Recent press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
50 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

we have real problems by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:06:52 AM
Deal with probabilities by JohnPeebles on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:12:17 PM
Aren't Actualities more relevant than probabilities? by Aurora on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:33:34 PM
try this by Aurora on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:45:37 PM
Hard to deal with the facts of a matter while they're being by Citizen Activist on Friday, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:45:25 AM
Hard to deal with the facts of a matter while they're being by Citizen Activist on Friday, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:46:23 AM
Not sure, by Aurora on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:47:52 PM
Reasonable question. But my BP Source by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:30:36 PM
An interesting link by Aurora on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:46:49 PM
The workers on the rig at the explosion by Aurora on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:07:45 PM
Meanwhile by Aurora on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:22:02 PM
AOL - This is BP's MEDIA response. by Aurora on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:36:26 PM
This is the best answer they can give?! by Scott Baker on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:21:07 AM
I think this is where the "rumor" started: by William Cormier on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:48:12 PM
william cormier by geraldine guimond on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:06:57 AM
A month ago you posted an article promoting the by Stanimal on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:45:36 PM
I think it's almost impossible to stop the gusher. by William Cormier on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:15:39 PM
Great Job Rob by Stephen Pizzo on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:00:15 PM
Gee, I know I feel re-assured now! by Bia Winter on Friday, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:13:36 PM
Huffington Post States Methane Bubble True w/Substantiation by William Cormier on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:05:17 PM
True? by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:44:05 PM
I'm going to do some more searching by William Cormier on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:05:59 PM
Don't worry, William by Bia Winter on Friday, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:20:11 PM
Disinfo Leaks Faster Than the BP Well by Andre Ouellet on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:20:02 PM
Lindsey Williams Doesn't Endorse Methane Bubble by Mac McKinney on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:48:40 PM
I get a fishy smell from this, as in RED HERRING. by Kyle Griffith on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:23:32 PM
I'd still rather know.. by Aurora on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:13:14 PM
Re: geologist Chris Landau's article by Allan Wayne on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:19:22 PM
Landau admits one thing: by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:10:33 AM
The Exxon geologist's statement sounds BOGUS by Kyle Griffith on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:47:17 AM
Oil, carbon, methane gas, diamonds by Allan Wayne on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:24:10 AM
Oil, like water, follows the course of least resistence, by Kyle Griffith on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:11:05 PM
That sounds reasonable to me, too. by Allan Wayne on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:38:18 PM
Can we go easy on the condescension, please? by ear on Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:57:30 PM
P.S. It will be interesting to hear what the geologists say by ear on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:39:27 PM
The quake is probably unrelated by William Cormier on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:05:26 PM
That was supposed to be a "5.0 Quake" by William Cormier on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:45:46 PM
Do you have any data on deaths? by ear on Friday, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:37:46 PM
Here's one insider's report who lives in Plaquemines by Bia Winter on Saturday, Jun 26, 2010 at 1:13:35 PM
The metane volcano by geraldine guimond on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:54:29 AM
Why so voceferiously over the top, Mr. Kall? by David Hastings on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:43:07 AM
More silly "tin foil hatters" aka US Scientists/Texas A&M by David Hastings on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:53:21 AM
Wayne Madson, The Cavern, The Pre-Emptive Blowback by aberamsay on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:15:40 AM
Don't Worry about Wives Tales by Starla Immak on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:26:03 AM
Dis-Info for the masses by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:40:32 AM
Dynamite post, Steve. by GLloyd Rowsey on Saturday, Jun 26, 2010 at 1:38:02 PM
Methane Bubble Earthquake by Nancy S on Thursday, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:47:28 PM
Your BP "Expert" I'd Rather Get My Info From Kindra Arneseu by Citizen Activist on Friday, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:36:50 AM
How to wake people up? by Aurora on Friday, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:24:21 PM
And will their next rig be named "Titanic"?. by Kyle Griffith on Friday, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:36:40 PM