Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
July 22, 2008 at 04:34:33

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 7/22/08:

McCain to NY Times; Damn It My Friend, Can't You See? I Am Right, Obama's Wrong. Let Me Repeat...

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Rob Kall (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Rob Kall - Writer

Senator McCain is beginning to show us what a McCain presidency will look like and it ain't pretty. It's creepy. Not surprisingly, the right wing echo chamber is demonstrating what it will act like, with its latest clueless demonstration, proving that Fox News and the Drudgereport are good at what they do-- echoing talking points and delivering messages-- but short on the goods when it comes to even getting what it means to function as a journalistic operation.

Earlier this week, Obama sent the NY Times an Op-Ed ahead of a speech, one that contained new ideas and information. The NY Times opted to run it.

McCain sent a print version of what we've been seeing on TV since Obama started on his massively successful, slam dunk overseas tour. The McCain piece was a poorly written, painfully repetitive recitation of his anti-Obama, "I was right on the surge and he was wrong and won't admit it" rant. I was going to say talking point but it's no longer just a talking point. McCain looks desperate and frustrated when he launches into his tirade how, and annoyed that "we" are not getting it, not lapping up his bromides and understanding how right he is.


The problem is, his message is now falling on ears that have been updated. It's an old, stale message that doesn't seem to be working. Right on Surge, Obama Wrong. Yadda yadda yadda.

So what?!? He's been right on how to get out and Maliki has repeatedly confirmed that this is what the Iraqis want. Oh? You say Maliki doesn't know what he wants or what the Iraqis need?

Just imagine what a president this kind of inability to let go, this obtuse, stuck, inability to recognize the fact that the situation has changes, that the vectors in play have changed. McCain seems imprisoned within his brittle inflexibility, stuck with his limited range of ideas. Look familiar? It should. It's the G.W. Bush modus operandi sans a pit bull Dick Cheney type to drive it through.

Even the right wing echo chamber players who are having fun thinking they are beating up on the NY Times don't get it that their attacks, while they may play to their usual kool-aid marinated base, are clearly seen as clueless by any and all of the players in the real media, in the real journalistic world-- both publishers and writers alike.

I publish a medium sized website and routinely encounter rank amateurs who declare that their freedom of speech is violated if their poorly written articles are rejected. Sorry. You have the right to speak or write hackneyed or badly written pieces. We don't have to publish them. Real media operations realize that. Faux media are so accustomed to accommodating the people and organizations they serve that they demonstrate their cluelessness with their smarmy remarks and indignation that McCain's repetitive hack writing was rejected.

I give the NY Times extra credit for NOT publishing the McCain piece. It might have sold some extra papers, but it would have definitely NOT been up to the standards the NY Times holds for writing. You can read it, here, on the Drudgereport. Ironically, now that the piece of writing has become news as an object, it would be appropriate to publish it, but not as an op-ed, instead, as the document that was rejected.

Of course, it is totally unrealistic to think that the right wing echo chamber organizations (I am loath to call them media) will ever actually report that this is actually another blunder by McCain and his handlers. It will be interesting to see if the more moderate media-- the big three networks and CNN will follow MSNBC in mocking the indignation that Fox News and the Drudgereport have demonstrated.

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Book Recommendations for "2008 Election Presidential"
Presidential Elections 1789-2008 (Presidential Elections Since 1789)
by CQ Press

$59.00

Number of pages: 417
Publisher: CQ Press

Presidential Elections, 1789-2008: County, State, and National Mapping of Election Data
by Prof. Hanes Walton Jr.

$150.00
Lowest New Price $113.71

Number of pages: 592
Publisher: University of Michigan Press

How Barack Obama Won: A State-by-State Guide to the Historic 2008 Presidential Election (Vintage)
by Chuck Todd

$12.95
Lowest New Price $5.90

Number of pages: 272
Publisher: Vintage

The 2008 Presidential Elections: A Story in Four Acts

$80.00
Lowest New Price $73.87

Number of pages: 272
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
21 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Force and Fraud by John Hanks on Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:26:17 AM
Once again, by shanti on Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:34:57 AM
Too many clueless people. by PeterJ on Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:45:11 AM
They CHOOSE to be clueless by Roger on Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:05:34 PM
Don't rule it out! by Maxwell on Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:35:05 PM
They still should have published it by Maxwell on Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:51:09 PM
It is not a style issue from what I have seen/read by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 at 3:00:22 PM
Not a Screed by Sam Adams on Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 at 5:14:47 PM
5 paragraphs saying the same thing...Surge Surge Surge by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 at 8:35:57 PM
Obama, Its the biggest no-brainer ever! by Lew Ranger on Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:15:46 PM
Applaud the NY Times for Making McCain Answer a Question by Julie Johnson on Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:29:53 PM
Abysmal Failure? by Sam Adams on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:42:13 AM
That is because you dont know what you are talking about by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:34:30 AM
Thank You! by PeterJ on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:49:28 AM
Contradiction by Dolores Sailors on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:14:20 AM
Surge success? by PeterJ on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:46:58 AM
It's called a 3rd grade education by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:26:45 AM
Point being? by PeterJ on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:55:31 AM
All BUT Three, Not Three Benchmarks by Sam Adams on Thursday, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:51:00 AM
P.S. by Sam Adams on Thursday, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:12:44 AM
NYT editorial policy/The SURGE by GalapagoLarry on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 5:47:33 PM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum