Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 11/18/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (8 comments)

Let dinosaurs Die

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Why should we support companies that choose not to move forward with the times? These car companies have continued to make cars with outdated technology for which there is rapidly declining demand. By bailing out these car makers, we say, as a nation, that we will continue to support our fossil fuel addiction and continue our dependence on dead dinosaurs. Not a positive step!  

One option would be that we could take the same money and give it to car makers that are building energy efficient vehicles, enable them to bring us into the clean energy clean transportation age on a larger scale then they have been able to. The job losses at old factories will lrad to new jobs at new factories. These technologies are not new, they have been suppressed and ignored and these "big three" automakers chose to do so. Its time for the old to die and the new to take over.

Why should we bail them out with our tax dollars, only to have to pay them again for  new gas guzzler that we already paid for through our tax-funded bailout. How much do these companies want-- tens of billions of TAX PAYER money? These are companies that have been trying to get tax breaks so they can pay their top execs more, and cut jobs. I can't remember the last time I heard that GM, Ford, or Chrysler were opening new factories to create jobs. That money will go to lining their greedy pockets. 

 Call me a socialist but why not spend three hundred billion dollars on a government program that uses our tax dollars to convert old car engines that run on gas into hybrids, or fully electric, or solar, or hydrogen, or compressed air, or ethanol, or we could just start building new cars as well. Recycle what we already have, give a tax break to people who do it. That would be $300,000,000,000 going into American Tax payers hands creating new jobs, breaking through with new clean technology and if done right offering affordable vehicles that meet standards that we the people vote to pass. 

The US Department of transportation reported in 2006 that 7.7 million units were sold domestic and foreign. How 'bout we do these manufacturers a favor and lighten their load? They can use the money that they have to focus on the wealthy, because wealthy people will continue to want their gluttonous vehicles, or not. Who cares? A new, more efficient vehicle will be available. And the government doesn't need to corner the market, just make affordable, energy efficient cars. We can leave the high end/luxury vehicles for the rich to continue to buy from the big three.

·      Hey big auto, you need a handout, lots of tax payer money, to build cars no one is buying. I have an answer. No, but we will recognize your problem, and take our own action. The government will build and sell cars, creating a program that is available for qualified tax payers for affordable new cars.  Government JOBS for those who worked at all of the closing Big three factories, cheap cars for those who previously couldn’t afford new clean cars, and the beginning of a energy revolution standardizing clean energy technology as a model for the rest of the world. And hey, with nation wide production we could even export the cars, become a Powerful exporting nation again.

Lets get it right and use the government the way that we should. To work for the people, helping the masses not the rich. 

 

Benjamin Kall is a Freelance Audio Engineer/ Digital Media Producer. Mainly working as a audio engineer and sound mixer on independent films in the Philadelphia area. Ben works with all sorts of media whether it be audio, video or images. For (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I'm with you, Ben by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:56:04 PM
Why not? Timing and the lack of operational detail by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 8:45:08 PM
right on the money by Jan Baumgartner on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 8:53:21 PM
The problem I see by Ben Kall on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:50:03 PM
Ps: Re your signature line by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:00:20 PM
Back on Track, America! by Jet Graphics on Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:37:45 PM
Ben and y'all - please read my recent article by Margaret Bassett on Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:49:32 PM
Gas guzzlers & war crimes by dick overfield on Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:16:57 PM