Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (9 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Kissinger, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Iran's Nuclear Program

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Those beating the drum about Iran's nuclear program should be made aware that the United States has been complicit in the Iranian program since the Ford administration. Then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger offered a "strange deal" to Pakistan which was formulated by Richard Cheney, Ford's Chief-of-Staff and Donald Rumsfeld, Ford's Defense Secretary, according to an extremely well-researched and copiously foot-noted book by Adrian Levy and Catherine Scott-Clark, entitled: Deception: Pakistan, the United States and the Secret Trade in Nuclear Weapons.

While focusing on Pakistan's nuclear program, the Reagan administration's turning a blind eye to it, and General Zia's blood-thirsty military rule while recruiting and funding the Afghani Freedom Fighters (better known as the mujahedeen, a.k.a. Al Qaeda), Deception references the unlawful proliferation of nuclear technology by the United States to Iran under the Shah.

The "strange deal" that Cheney and Rumsfeld devised and which Kissinger offered to Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Pakistan's Prime Minister (before Zia had him executed), was an effort to persuade Pakistan to forego its plans to pursue a nuclear program. In 1976, Kissinger begrudgingly proposed that if Bhutto terminated Pakistan's own nascent uranium enrichment project, the United States would arrange to supply Pakistan with its needed enriched materials from a facility, funded and supplied by the US, and based in Iran.

Cheney and Rumsfeld master-minded the scheme, arguing that Iran--even though awash in oil and gas--would need a nuclear program to meet its future energy needs. This plan was to be the first nuclear deal with Iran and would have been extremely lucrative for US corporations such as Westinghouse and General Electric "which stood to earn $6.4 billion from the project." (The plan to lead Iran into the Nuclear Age was supported by Kissinger although the offer to involve Pakistan was not to his liking, hence his reluctance to propose the plan to Bhutto.)

Furthermore, an article in the Washington Post--written by Dafna Linzer and published on March 27, 2005--confirms "US involvement with Iran's nuclear program until 1979" which involved "large-scale intelligence-sharing and conventional weapons sales." The Linzer article goes on to assert that "Even with many key players in common" (editor's note: such as Cheney and Rumsfeld), "the U.S. government has taken opposite positions on questions of fact as its perception of U.S. interests has changed."

The complete Washington Post article can be read at:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3983-2005Mar26.html

Although publicly opposed to President Bush's hard-line stance on Iran and while favoring diplomacy over force of arms, the Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, has voiced her dismay over Iran's nuclear program. It has been reported by Cheryl Biren-Wright at OpEdNews.com that Madam Pelosi stated at a recent event that Iran has received "a lot of technology from China, from Pakistan, probably from Russia and other places."

http://www.opednews.com/articles/2/Nancy-Pelosi-Book-Signing-by-Cheryl-Biren-Wrigh-080807-772.html

It would be very surprising, indeed ludicrous, to think Madam Speaker was not aware that the United States--one of those "other places"--had initiated the proliferation of nuclear technology in Iran. Moreover, it is not surprising that Ms. Pelosi purposely omitted reference to the US role in the unlawful proliferation of nuclear technology. By avoiding a mention of the US complicity in Iran's nuclear program, Pelosi avoided the obvious pitfalls of obfuscation and deflected attention to tried and true adversaries, past and future: the People's Republic of China, Pakistan and the Russian Confederation.

Once again, the chickens, hatched by brood hens obsessed with imperial foreign policies, are coming home to roost. What is more, they once again carry nuclear eggs in flimsy baskets.

Post Script: A truly illuminating speech given at the World Affairs Council of Northern California by Deception co-author Adrian Levy can be viewed at FORA.TV. http://fora.tv/2007/10/30/Pakistan_and_the_A_Q__Khan_Network

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
impeach Bush, Cheney and Pelosi

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://lexisnexussolarplexus.blogspot.com/

After years of professional starvation as a 'working musician', DC found his way to Taiwan where he has lived and taught English as a foreign language for 18 years - fourteen of them married blissfully to Yashan 'Linda' Huang. "Having lived (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Kissinger, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Iran's Nuclear Program

The Myth of American Moral Authority

Surprise! Welcome to the Third World, Des Moines!

American Exceptionalism

Bush Explains 'Free Enterprise'

From Our Favorite Dick's Own Pie-hole

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Comment from Ratings:   Two things stand... by Margaret Bassett on Sunday, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:08:25 AM
Do you have any information about possible involve... by Anton Grambihler on Sunday, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:43:37 AM