Tags for This Article:

Law (1082)  Privacy (428)  Surveillance (398)  Domestic Spying (159)  Bush Lies (127)  Congressional Crime (115)  Congressional Coverups (108)  FISA (78)  C-Span (39)  Richard Nixon (27)  John Dean (17)  Illegal Wiretapping (12)  Bloomberg (11)  Capitulation (4) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
July 11, 2008 at 11:05:32

Headlined on 7/11/08:
John Dean: Congress is "a bunch of wusses"

by JC Garrett     Page 1 of 4 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

When John Dean, author and former White House Counsel to President Richard Nixon, appeared Wednesday on Rob Kall's radio show (mp3), he seemed willing to go further in his condemnations of current government than he has when appearing on Olberman or any of the mainstream shows on which he is a regular guest.

In fact, Rob's very first question about Dean's take on Congress immunizing telecoms with the passage of FISA amendments drew a refreshingly, honestly coarse answer from Dean, who bluntly said, "Well, it looks like we have a bunch of wusses up there on Capitol Hill, not much interested in civil liberties and very interested in C.Y.A." 

Dean contends that the immunity given to telecoms by the bill is "merely civil immunity" which does not immunize anyone from criminal prosecution, including telecoms. But he says, "Whether a Democratic administration would have the guts to ever prosecute anybody for any of this is another story."

Mr. Dean said he also questions whether Congress' immunization of telecoms for past crimes is even Constitutionally permissable. He says, "It's possible that a court could rule that Congress doesn't have the power, in the middle of a case that's being litigated to take away jurisdiction from the federal courts." Which makes a lot of sense. I can envision a judge having some objection to Congress changing the rules in the middle of the game and telling him that the judicial branch has no say in a case that he is currently hearing. That just might piss a federal judge plum off.

When Rob Kall asked about Dean's thoughts on law professor Johnathan Turley's statement on Olberman that President Bush has committed felonies 30 times by reauthorizing the illegal surveillance programs, Dean said he hadn't heard of Turley's remarks, but he made it very clear where he stands on Turley's judgement compared to George W. Bush's:

"If he says that Bush has violated the law 30 times, I'd put my money on Turley."

Rob then asked a question that I had suggested for Mr. Dean: What about the illegal wiretapping that occured before 9/11? Dean said he didn't know whether there was evidence of that. "Who knows if we'll ever know what they were doing?" Dean asked rhetorically.

But there is evidence. And lots of it.

Since the spineless Congress has decided to betray everything that was ever held sacred to American justice by waving its hand and making the felonies of criminal telecoms after 9/11 disappear, we now have to concentrate on what everyone already knows but hasn't talked much about.

A January 2006 article on Truthout, Bush Authorized Domestic Spying Before 9/11, states:

The National Security Agency advised President Bush in early 2001 that it had been eavesdropping on Americans during the course of its work monitoring suspected terrorists and foreigners believed to have ties to terrorist groups, according to a declassified document.

The NSA's vast data-mining activities began shortly after Bush was sworn in as president and the document contradicts his assertion that the 9/11 attacks prompted him to take the unprecedented step of signing a secret executive order authorizing the NSA to monitor a select number of American citizens thought to have ties to terrorist groups.

The document says that in its 2001 report entitled "Transition 2001," the NSA said, ""Make no mistake, NSA can and will perform its missions consistent with the Fourth Amendment and all applicable laws."

Then adds that "senior leadership must understand that the NSA's mission will demand a 'powerful, permanent presence' on global telecommunications networks that host both 'protected' communications of Americans and the communications of adversaries the agency wants to target."

The article goes on to say:

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

JC Garrett is a freelance writer and Constitutional scholar from the piney-woods of East Texas. He apologizes to the entire world that the great Lone Star State could have produced the neo-Neanderthal currently occupying the Oval Office. "I'm not ashamed to be an American. I'm ashamed George W. Bush is an American." Mr. Garrett owns and operates an independent recording studio, plays several instruments, writes, sings, and produces music. His stories have appeared in Political Affairs Magazine, ACLU FreedomWire, Online Journal, Infowars, Prison Planet, OpEd News, Consortium News, The Intelligence Daily, Democratic Underground, Truthdig, The Memory Hole, Wired, World Prout Assembly, and local publications.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments

Writer/Photographer. Advocate for clean government, media reform and civil liberties. Chair of the PDA-SJ Impeachment Team and co-leader of the NJ Impeach Groups. Writer and managing editor for OpEdNews.com. cherylbirenwright.wordpress.com
Cheryl Biren-WrightWriter/Photographer. Advocate for clean government, media reform and civil liberties. Chair of the PDA-SJ Impeachment Team and co-leader of the NJ Impeach Groups. Writer and managing editor for OpEdNews.com. cherylbirenwright.wordpress.com

Thanks and a question...

thanks, jc,  for bringing the rob kall/john dean interview to the pages of opednews. now...forgive my ignorance - does CYA mean "cover you asses?" i was wondering as i listened to him say that the other night.

regarding domestic spying before 9/11 - it's astounding how the msm refuses to recognize this in any meaningful way. it's important to remember that pelosi was informed of warrantless surveillance early on and well before the lid was blown off. we need to know when she was informed of it.

from an earlier opednews article, The Democratic Majority:

In a 2006 oped, Nancy Pelosi remarked that the president’s admission that he authorized the electronic surveillance on Americans is a "wake-up call for intensive congressional oversight of intelligence activities." With no expression of constitutional responsibility, she acknowledges that she, herself, had been informed of the president’s authorization. She went on to excuse herself by stating "But when the administration notifies Congress in this manner, it is not seeking approval."

Former CIA analyst, Ray McGovern, raises another unsettling question. According to the former head of Qwest Communications, the NSA sought assistance with surveillance in February 2001, challenging the repeated claim that 9/11 "changed everything." The question then, is "What Did Pelosi Know about NSA, and When Did She Know It?"

by Cheryl Biren-Wright (19 articles, 23 quicklinks, 8 diaries, 351 comments) on Friday, July 11, 2008 at 12:19:22 PM
 


JC Garrett is a freelance writer and Constitutional scholar from the piney-woods of East Texas. He apologizes to the entire world that the great Lone Star State could have produced the neo-Neanderthal currently occupying the Oval Office.

"I'm not ashamed to be an American. I'm ashamed George W. Bush is an American."

Mr. Garrett owns and operates an independent recording studio, plays several instruments, writes, sings, and produces music.

His stories have ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

JC GarrettJC Garrett is a freelance writer and Constitutional scholar from the piney-woods of East Texas. He apologizes to the entire world that the great Lone Star State could have produced the neo-Neanderthal currently occupying the Oval Office.

"I'm not ashamed to be an American. I'm ashamed George W. Bush is an American."

Mr. Garrett owns and operates an independent recording studio, plays several instruments, writes, sings, and produces music.

His stories have ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

You Got It

That's exactly what CYA means.

And if you wanna know the truth, NSA has been collecting telephone data and signals "intelligence" for a long, long time now. They just kept a low profile on their "vacuum cleaner" technology and actually stuck to protocol in minimization procedures that eliminated innocent American communications from the data they kept, and didn't allow info they received to be used by the Dpt of Justice as evidence in cases against Americans.

An earlier version was called ECHELON, and if you google it you'll find out more than you want to know.

But Bush stepped everything up and started using it for everything. Can there be any doubt that he has also used it for political gain?

Yes, Pelosi knew about some of it, and that's exactly why she took impeachment off the table.

Everyone that knew and was briefed on the program's specifics should be tried. "State secrets" and "presidential privilege" has become an absolute joke when it is used to commit crimes against the American people.

I talked about that in another article They can do it to all of us .

When the secrets the government keeps hurt Americans, they are secrets that aren't worth keeping.

by JC Garrett (38 articles, 62 quicklinks, 6 diaries, 558 comments) on Friday, July 11, 2008 at 12:38:48 PM
 


Michael Cavlan , RN, was an Official Green Party Observer for the 2004 Ohio Re-Count.
He was the Green Party Candidate for US Senate 2006 and is a Candidate US Senate
2008 Seeking Green Party Endorsement in Minnesota. See www.michaelcavlan.org

Michael CavlanMichael Cavlan , RN, was an Official Green Party Observer for the 2004 Ohio Re-Count.
He was the Green Party Candidate for US Senate 2006 and is a Candidate US Senate
2008 Seeking Green Party Endorsement in Minnesota. See www.michaelcavlan.org

The Real Wussies

are those who support the Congress.

 

The Democratic and Republican parties are the enemies of freedom, human rights, the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

 

You make apologies for them (yes, I am talking about MoveOn, PDA and every other Democratic apologist organization out there) then you have lost your right to complain about their cowardice and complicity.

 

They are just following your lead. 

by Michael Cavlan (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 225 comments) on Friday, July 11, 2008 at 1:19:37 PM
 


JC Garrett is a freelance writer and Constitutional scholar from the piney-woods of East Texas. He apologizes to the entire world that the great Lone Star State could have produced the neo-Neanderthal currently occupying the Oval Office.

"I'm not ashamed to be an American. I'm ashamed George W. Bush is an American."

Mr. Garrett owns and operates an independent recording studio, plays several instruments, writes, sings, and produces music.

His stories have ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

JC GarrettJC Garrett is a freelance writer and Constitutional scholar from the piney-woods of East Texas. He apologizes to the entire world that the great Lone Star State could have produced the neo-Neanderthal currently occupying the Oval Office.

"I'm not ashamed to be an American. I'm ashamed George W. Bush is an American."

Mr. Garrett owns and operates an independent recording studio, plays several instruments, writes, sings, and produces music.

His stories have ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

What is your goal?

I don't know if you've noticed, but most everyone here criticizes politicians when they need it no matter if they are Republican or Democrat. In fact, more Democrats are criticized on OpEd News than any Republican other than George W. Bush.

As much as I like Obama, and as much as I have supported his candidacy, I have come down hard on him when he does the wrong thing. I think that a majority of Democrats in Congress should be booted out tomorrow, and replaced by people who will do the right thing. But there are a few who are the real deal.

There are few here who voice support for bad members of Congress. There are few here who will vote for them.

Now, what out of all that gives you reason to call those people "wussies?"

What, with all your bitching and moaning about people who merely say they are going to vote in this election, are you trying to accomplish? Are you saying they should not vote? Are you saying they should only vote for candidates who have no shot at winning more than a miniscule percentage of the vote?

If you have a purpose, I'd like to know what it is, and how you think that what you are doing could possibly be of benefit. 

by JC Garrett (38 articles, 62 quicklinks, 6 diaries, 558 comments) on Friday, July 11, 2008 at 5:28:30 PM
 


I am retired with not enough money saved to counter inflation and being forced back into the work force. I am a vet, (Vietnam era), extremely disappointed with the aggressive, imperialistic direction this country has taken in Iraq, to control and usurp it's oil, and the extent to which BOTH parties are complicit.
Nick van NesI am retired with not enough money saved to counter inflation and being forced back into the work force. I am a vet, (Vietnam era), extremely disappointed with the aggressive, imperialistic direction this country has taken in Iraq, to control and usurp it's oil, and the extent to which BOTH parties are complicit.

Cavlan makes good point

I think what Cavlan is saying is that the real wussies are the apathetic American voters, perhaps not you but me, who by and large accept what is happening, the corruption and violation of the Constitution, under this administration. I am a 63 year old veteran who has just recently, (within the past five years) come to the realization that our electred officials work for us and should be responsive to us. I, like most Americans I know was always intimidated to call them or write them. Why should that be? Most Americans are not even sure who their reps are or how they feel on certain issues. They are afraid to ask. E-mail has helped to change that, making our reps more responsive, but, sadly no more available or accountable. For the most part they simply get back (within seconds) with a form email, thanking us for our concern, and asking our patience to excuse them for being so busy that they cannot respond further at this time (ever). I must have e-mailed my congressman, Bill Delahunt, D-MA, 20 times urging him to vote for impeachment. Finally he wrote back saying he thought, like Pelosi, impeachment would be a "political distraction." Really? From what? Our illegal invasion of Iraq? Our oil grab of another country's resource? Political for him, maybe, but how much more damaging for the Constitution, our country and the rest of us if we fail to impeach? On principle alone we must. For legal reasons, not political reasons, we must. The democrats reasons against impeachment are not valid, legitimate, Constitutional reasons not to impeach, they are self-centered, political party reasons not to impeach. Staring us all right in the face are compelling, legal reason TO impeach that if we do not move ahead with, as mandated by their own vows, will be a very real and lost opportunity and sad day for this once great country of ours. Congressmasn Delahunt has not gotten back to me and I suppose never will. And this is precisely why I will never vote for him again and why I urge any and all of you who might be reading this to find out who your rep is and what their stated position is on impeachment and our corrupt administration. Most importantly don't forget to tell them your feeling on the subject and how you expect them to represent you, their boss.

 

Our lack of engagement, the 2 party system, the whole voting process has encouraged this disconnect. Conversely, our un-watched elected officials, realizing their unchecked freedom we have given them, especially incumbents, have become increasingly arrogant with power. This bubble will pop sooner than later. All it will take is one caught official to turn whistle blower before he's assasinated. The truth will out, like how three world trade buildings fell as if demolished with explosives rather than impossibly "collapsing" as reported, including one tower that wasn't even hit by a plane. Go figure. People may laugh at the conspiracy theory but more and more professionals and experts are putting their names behind what appear to be rational, unanswered questions. People get the type of government they deserve, not necessarily one that is designed for them or one they want and hope will be there for them.

 

I agree with Cavlan: we are the wussies and we are rapidly running out of time to get rid of Pelosi and demand, DEMAND impeachment in defense of our Constitution and for violations at the top which are staring us right in the face. History will judge us no less coldly than it does the wretched German majority who capitulated to the Nazis. Let the chips fall where they will until we get to the bottom of this and back on track. Do we want a government that tells us what is in our own best interest, or do we tell them?

 

It is the end of the Cold War which brings this new, self declared "threat" of terrorism to a head. It's no secret that banks make most of their money from war. Not only banks. Corporations, coincidentally the largest in the world. People. How much money does the military spend on special forces alone? And yet they have to hire mercenaries, ("defence contractors") which make about ten times as much money in one day of fighting, depending on the mission. The "War on Terrorism" is there and happening because the military industrial complex needs a war, some kind of war, any kind of war, to exist, to keep making money. One of the sayings I heard from senior officers during Vietnam which keeps returning to me is: "it may not be the best war but it's the only war we got right now." Capitalism needs growth to survive. The military needs war for promotions. And ironically, terrorism has demonstrated more than anything the ineffectiveness and irrelevance of our military which could do nothing but watch on 9/11 as the towers crumbled. Bush would have us believe we could fight terrorists on the battlefield, in the streets of Baghdad, and be just as successful as we were in bringing down the Germans. This defies reason because terrorism by definition, BY DEFINITION, is war proof. Think about it. All the nuclear submarines in the world could not prevent some psyched up teenager from strapping on a backpack of plastic explosives and walking into Grand Central Station at rush hour to do his or her thing. Terrorism doesn't apply just to bringing down tall buildings with our own commercial airplanes. How long did it take authorities to round up the two (American) nuts that were terrorizing Washington DC last summer.? And that was a freak catch. "War on terrorism" is a metaphor like war on drugs, on poverty. But in the case of "War on terrorism" it is instantly oxymoronic because there is no fighting it, not in the conventional sense, with weapons, not against an enemy with no return address.

by Nick van Nes (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 113 comments) on Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 12:52:16 PM
 

 

6 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

Documentation on Sarah Palin's IQ, Academic Record, and Job Performance Posted by Stephen Fox

Bailout Fraud: Does the bailout pass the smell test? by Paul Craig Roberts

Resignation letter from the McCain Palin Campaign by Robyn Crane

Aries Full Moon October 14, 2008 by C.L. Pagano

What you should know about Barack Obama by miles mathis

Johnstown, PA McCain-Palin rally, view it and weep for America by Ed Tubbs

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

Race in the 2008 Election by Sally Liuzzo-Prado

Marx, Globalization, and the Death of Neo-Liberalism by David Schultz

Go To Top 50 Most Popular