Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  2
Share on Facebook
  1
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Israel: Supreme Court Presiding Justice Asher Grunis refuses to explain the appointment of new "Chief Clerk"...

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

opednews.com


(image by State of Israel)

Presiding Justice Asher Grunis must resign!

____

OccupyTLV, March 09 -- Reminder has been sent to Israeli Presiding Justice Asher Grunis, pertaining to request for a copy of the appointment record of Ms Idit Meloul as the Supreme Court's new "Chief Clerk". [1]

Presiding Justice Grunis, who had previously responded on a number of letters pertaining to the office of Chief Clerk, failed to respond on a February 19, 2014, request for Melloul's appointment records. [2]

Ms Melloul had previously appeared on the web site of the Supreme Court as "Assistant Chief Clerk". The same web site has recently started listing Ms Melloul as "Chief Clerk". Yet, no appointment record has been found in the official registry, nor was any media report been found of such senior appointment. Presiding Justice Grunis has also failed so far to respond on the matter at all.

Absent clarification by Presiding Justice Grunis, the most plausible explanation is that the false appearance of Idit Meloul as "Chief Clerk" is the default follow-up for the false appearance of Ms Sarah Lifschitz in the same office over the past decade. [3]

On October 15, 2013, a criminal-fraud complaint was filed against Asher Grunis, relative to the false appearance of Lifschitz as "Chief Clerk". [4]

On October 31, 2013, "Chief Clerk" Sarah Lifschitz "departed" from the Supreme Court.

During the decade of Lifschitz's false appearance as Chief Clerk, numerous Supreme Court records were forged and falsified, and conduct of simulated process has became a routine. [5-7]

During the same decade, all decisions of the Supreme Court have been served:

* Unsigned by the judicial authorities,

* Uncertified by the Chief Clerk of the Court,

* Bearing the disclaimer "subject to editing and phrasing changes", and

* With no authentication letter from the Office of the Clerk.

Such records cannot be deemed by a reasonable person as valid and effectual court records.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience in recent years in analyzing fraud in banking and government computer systems. In such research he documented the important role that large-scale fraud in such systems plays in the current financial (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

ARGENTINA: Again on the verge of economic collapse - again the victim of US treachery!

What part of the missile attacks on Tel Aviv is an Israeli hoax?

PALESTINE: IDF soldiers protest campaign goes viral

ISRAEL: Nation hijacked by a Shin-Bet Judiciary Gang

Stanley Fischer's legacy in Israel - placing banks above the law, subservient to the US surveillance apparatus

Large-scale fraud in US court records is linked to failing banking regulation, detailed in a paper, peer-reviewed and pu

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments