Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

"Isolationist Sentiment" favored by the American People, Are Obama/Romney Listening?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 2   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to None 10/24/12

opednews.com

Isolationism and a deep aversion to getting into "foreign entanglements" was once the favored stance of a majority of the American people. So it's worth taking a short stroll down memory lane to highlight their thinking.

Such attitudes prevailed and prevented FDR from entering on the side of Great Britain early in W.W.II until after the attack on Pearl Harbor in December, 1941, more than two years after the war began in September, 1939.

Most prominently vocal in demanding isolationism during those pre-war years were the Republicans.

After the war it was Truman and the Democrats who were the internationalists, particularly with the Marshall Plan in aiding war torn Western Europe.

Then came the Korean war with Truman at the helm, the cold war with the Communist Soviet Union after they got the atomic bomb and the subsequent "Red Scare" McCarthy era that had most Americans, including now the former Republican isolationists in favor of containing the "godless" Soviets and containing Communist expansionism. This led to the "domino theory" that had Communist takeover in one country leading inevitably to neighboring countries falling under its dominion which contributed to U.S. involvement in Viet Nam.

That costly war eventually split the country politically with Republicans blaming Democrats for the defeat and isolationism now embraced by the Democrats.

By the time Ronald Reagan entered the White House in January, 1981, ending the hostage crisis in Iran, renewing a build up of defense spending against the "Evil Empire" (USSR) plus clandestine engagement in the "Contra" wars in Central America, isolationism and no engagement in foreign entanglements was hardly in Republican thinking. To them it was all about overcoming the memory of the lost Viet Nam war and America reasserting itself. To these former isolationists there was no war they didn't love capped by their early triumphalism of Bush's invading Iraq in 2003.    

Come 2012, after 8 long years in Iraq, 11 years and counting in Afghanistan along with the hard recession and Americans, according to the latest polls, are once again having "isolationist sentiment", including Republicans.

A Pew Research Center poll has "2 out of 3 Americans believing the United States should be less involved with leadership changes in the Middle East". Also "Americans who believe democracy promotion abroad is crucial has dropped sharply with only 13% giving it a high priority". That's hardly a sentiment for getting involved in foreign entanglements.

Considering what the two major party candidates talked about in Monday's presidential debate, is there disconnect between them and the American people?

If anyone listened carefully, both Obama and Romney stood steadfast in defending Israel at any cost and both said Iran is a major threat that must be prevented from developing a nuclear capability with both men implying a military strike is very much on the table unless Iran caves under U.S. pressure. Considering polls show the American people are against a war with Iran, Obama's and Romney's statements are hardly in line with what the American people want.

So isolationism and not engaging in foreign entanglements are certainly not the sentiments of either major party presidential candidate, one of whom is going to be elected on November 6.

From here it is no mystery that both presidential candidates embrace foreign entanglements that lead to endless war. Such policies add to corporations bottom lines and favor the corporatist oligarchs that underwrite their campaigns as well as the overwhelming number of members from both parties in Congress and the state houses of all 50 states.

Those are the interests most members of the two major parties represent, certainly not the interests of the people.

 

dglefc22733@aol.com

Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

The Danger of an Israeli Attack on Iran

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It would help Us reduce military expenses and less... by Daniel Penisten on Wednesday, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:26:41 PM
non-interventionism with isolationism.  What ... by June Genis on Wednesday, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:41:29 PM