Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Iraq Rejects Bush Doctrine and US military bases

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (20 fans)

opednews.com

The US installed puppet government of Nouri al-Maliki has begun to cut the strings that bind it to its puppet masters in the Bush administration. The Iraqi government is balking at many of the provisions in the so-called “status of forces” agreement between the Bush administration and the Iraqi parliament.

In an odd, anti-symmetrical show of non-democracy here in the US, the status of forces agreement is being voted on by the Iraqi parliament, whereas the Bush administration has refused to consider the agreement a treaty, and refused to put it before Congress for a vote. “We have to give them democracy over there so we don't have to have it here”, might be the Bush administration's slogan on this matter.

A number of provisions in the status of forces agreement have irked the Iraqis including the minor issues of 58 permanent military bases in Iraq, full use of Iraqi airspace up to 30,000 feet altitude, and complete immunity from prosecution for wrongdoing by all military personnel and contractors.

As it is written, the status of forces agreement would be permanent, with the provision that either side could pull out of the agreement with two years of notice. This means that if the agreement is signed at the beginning of 2009, the earliest the Iraqis could pull out of the arrangement would be 2011. The other option is for Iraq to permit an extension of the current agreement, which expires at the end of this year.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki just returned from another meeting with Iranian officials who are strongly opposed to the status of forces agreement between the US and Iraq. It is doubtful that the Bush administration foresaw the disagreement over the status of forces agreement would drive al-Maliki to deeper discussions with the Iranians, but then again, the Bush administration also thought the Iraq war would usher in the era of $20 a barrel oil. Oops, their bad.

Jalal al Din al Saghir, a leading lawmaker from the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq was quoted as saying: " Is there sovereignty for Iraq - or isn't there? If it is left to them, they would ask for immunity even for the American dogs.”



Can you hear the sounds of the puppet slowly cutting, one by one, the strings that tie them to their puppet masters?

Read more here: click

 

http://www.n-acetylaspartate.com

John R. Moffett PhD, is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com, and is a research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area. Dr. Moffett's main area of research focuses on the brain metabolite N-acetylaspartate, and an associated genetic disorder (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Are Dogs Carnivores?

Was it Nanotech-Thermite or Phasers that took down the WTC?

President Obama's Complete Dismissal of the Progressive Agenda

Is Your Computer Ready for the Confiker Virus on April 1st?

The Real Swine Flu Conspiracy

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

A story loudly ignored and drowned out by the nois... by Sandy Sand on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:18:13 AM
I think it is being ignored because no one has fig... by John Haigh on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:28:37 AM
Assume this: I left it for you to have something t... by Sandy Sand on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:25:33 PM
The media just keep trying to ignore it, and will ... by John R Moffett on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:03:12 PM