Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

In Defense of (Some) Pornography

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (33 fans)
- Advertisement -
Introduction

 

In our society, pornography is considered something immoral, pernicious, shameful, scandalous. Those who produce it, and those who are its audience, are seen as disreputable.

(Pornography I am defining as any media that depict sexual matters and whose purpose –whatever the nature of the depiction (however subtle or blatant)—is to produce intense sexual arousal in its audience. Such media include pictures, stories, and videos.)

Looking at the whole universe of today’s pornography, one can certainly find much to object to in terms of what’s healthy for human relationships and what’s moral. But the American condemnation of pornography tends not to be confined to any particular kinds of pornography, but rather objects in principle to depictions whose purpose is the arousal of “prurient interest.”

It is in this more comprehensive condemnation that the defects in American morality’s relationship to sexuality are revealed. Indeed, I would argue that in a moral and sexually healthy society, there would be a respectable place for some kinds of pornography. And I would venture further that what’s wrong with the pornography in today’s America is merely the counterpart with what’s wrong with our culture’s sexual morality.

Where Does Sexuality Fit Into the Human Good?

 

- Advertisement -

Can you imagine any fully explicit depiction of people engaging in sex that you would think to be a good thing for some adults to make and for other adults to watch? If not, why not?

Our culture creates media –considered entirely legitimate and respectable-- that evoke in us the experience of grief. We have media expressions, generally held in high regard, that provoke us to the experience of fear. So also with anger and wonder and nostalgia, and other feelings that are part of the basic repertoire of human experiences.

If all these feelings can be the legitimate outcomes of our experiences of media (literature or film or painting or whatever), why should sexual arousal be different?

Is it because there’s some reason why sexuality uniquely should be kept private? But why should it be acceptable for our media to explore all kinds of other aspects of our lives in intimate detail but somehow must stop short of getting deeply into a sexual space?

Is your objection based on the idea that the conditions under which people are brought in to participate in the production of much of today’s pornography are exploitive or coercive? If so, would you approve if the conditions of such employment were fair and if the participation were freely chosen? Or do you maintain that no pornography could be produced if fairness and freedom of choice were protected? Is it your belief that in a healthy society, for no one would it be an acceptable and wise choice to participate in the creation of the pornography (issues of consumption aside)?

If you disapprove of all explicitly sexual, deliberately arousing media – if you disapprove of all pornography—is it because you think that there’s something fundamentally wrong, or base, or sinful, or dirty about sexuality?

This certainly has been a widespread attitude in the history of our civilization. But what is the justification for it?

Sexuality is not only necessary for the transmission of life, but sexual passion is one of the most powerful avenues along which people experience a gladness to be alive.

If “Therefore choose life” is supposed to be the injunction from the God of the Bible, why would the arousal of sexual desire be contrary to our notion of the sacred in human life?

Indeed there are some religious traditions –including some threads in the Judeo-Christian line—in which sexuality is seen as connected with the sacred.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Andy Schmookler, an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher, was the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia's 6th District. He is the author of various books including The Parable of the Tribes: The (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Like Colbert? Article Plus Critique

Mel Gibson's Rant as Profound Clue

To Anti-Obamite Lefties: It Doesn't Matter If You're Right

How Important is the Loss of Friendship?

The Mystery of Obama's Relationship with Power

Power and Corruption: Just What Is Their Relationship?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Much of what you say makes a lot of sense, theoret... by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:59:10 PM
The question I am asking is:  in an ideal wor... by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:10:32 PM
Dear Mr. Kall,Psychobabble.  I enjoy (some) p... by Donald Rankin III on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:31:48 PM
Republican flags and Fundanazi crosses are pornogr... by John Hanks on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:28:05 PM
We live in a culture wherein it is totally accepta... by mrk * on Wednesday, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:45:16 PM