Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   18 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

How to stop the Tea Party: a response to Sam Harris

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 8/26/11

Become a Fan
  (19 fans)
Here are two ways to stop the Tea Party and other libertarians.

First, progressive Democrats should fight to take over the Democratic Party -- the way Tea Party activists recently took over much of the GOP, and the way religious conservatives took it over about a decade ago. In short, as described in This Is How To Beat The Republicans and Tea Party. progressives should get involved in their local Democratic Party, by becoming a Precinct Committee Officer, Precinct Captain, or other activist. Angry conservatives take over the GOP. Angry progressives too often flee the Democratic Party and join an advocacy group or third party.

The second way to fight the Tea Party is to educate people about how wrong-headed libertarian ideology is, so that middle class voters wise up and stop voting against their own self-interest. Conservatives have done all in their power to corrupt, starve, weaken, and denounce government. To fight back, progressives need to market good government and fair taxation as forces for good.


Tea Party Protest by Wikipedia image


Often libertarians compare taxation to theft, and in recent years they have become angrier, bolder, and more influential. I don't know what explains their hatred of government. This is a question, perhaps, for psychologists. But if progressives are going to win this war of ideas, they need to attack head on the right wing arguments against government.

What got me thinking anew about this topic was an email from author Sam Harris, who recently published an article ("How Rich is Too Rich?"). In the article Harris suggested, like Warren Buffet, that billionaires should pay more in taxes. The response from Harris' readers surprised him. He got lots of hate mail from libertarians, including, for example, this gem: "You are scum sam. unsubscribed." As Harris says in his blog


You can declare the world's religions to be cesspools of confusion and bigotry, you can argue that all drugs should be made legal and that free will is an illusion. You can even write in defense of torture. But I assure you that nothing will rile and winnow your audience like the suggestion that billionaires should contribute more of their wealth to the good of society.

One part of the problem is incorrect framing. Harris himself is guilty of this. For example, in his blog Harris wrote, "They [libertarians] consider any effort the State could take to prevent the most extreme juxtaposition of wealth and poverty to be indistinguishable from Socialism." But the issue isn't just redistribution of wealth from the rich to the lower classes -- forcing the rich to help the poor. That makes it sound like theft. (Indeed, Harris himself says in that blog, "I agree that everyone should be entitled to the fruits of his or her labors and that taxation, in the State of Nature, is a form of theft. But it appears to be a form of theft that we require, given how selfish and shortsighted most of us are.") More fundamental than redistribution of wealth is the fact that we need government to provide various protections and services that the market system will not provide. Without those protections and services, billionaires couldn't earn or enjoy their wealth. So the rich simply aren't paying their fair share of the bills.

We need to pay for courts, police, regulatory systems, disaster relief, roads, scientific research, public health, education, and parks -- as well as the imperialist wars that Bush and Cheney started. Plus, the national debt is something like $14 trillion, and that bill needs to be paid. One can argue that often government is corrupt and wasteful -- and it was especially corrupt and wasteful between 2000 and 2006, when Republicans controlled government. But to say that government should be minimized overlooks all the good it does -- when it's not mismanaged.

Government serves the Common Good --known in the US Constitution as the General Welfare. Often it provides services more cheaply and equitably than the private market system. (Health care is an example.)

The best analogy is this: Government is like a computer's operating system. An operating system provides fundamental services and protections that allow user programs to run. Without an operating system, your computer would be a useless heap of metal and plastic. Similarly, governments provide various services and protections. Without government, and the taxes that support it, business and society cannot thrive.

For example, the sub-prime crash was largely due to reckless deregulation. And when the system crashed, who came to the rescue? Uncle Sam.

In fact, without government we'd be hunter-gatherers.

The libertarian mindset is sociopathic. Even the US Constitution calls for a strong central government to promote the General Welfare. Libertarians want to run their programs on a computer with no operating system.

Alas, in recent years we've gotten more bad government than good government -- which is why things are heading downhill. But the solution isn't to get rid of government; the solution is to fix government, by stopping the corruption and mismanagement. For further reading, see

Government is like a computer's operating system: a response to libertarians. Bring on the Reagan Counterrevolution (a defense of Big Government against libertarian attacks), Government: Unproductive? Wasteful? Corrupt?,

and these websites: Government is Good, Government is Great, and The General Welfare.

I agree, by the way that there's too much redistribution of wealth: from the middle class to rich.

 

http://waliberals.org

DFA organizer, Democratic Precinct Committee Officer, writer, and programmer. My op-ed pieces have appeared in the Seattle Times, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and elsewhere. See http://WALiberals.org and http://TruthSite.org for my writing, my (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The myth that the Dems are as bad as the Repugs

Failure to prosecute: why Obama is having trouble passing health care reform

Undividing the Left: Hard-core and Soft-core progressives

"They're out to get us!" On trust, distrust, and organizing for change

The Battle over I-1098 in Washington State

Why Abortion Isn't Murder

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Don I feel like there has been theft (as I believe... by David Vicks on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:58:07 AM
I would expect most libertarians have some money s... by David Vicks on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:13:41 AM
Why is it they only care about government spending... by David Vicks on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:42:32 AM
My comments are not coming over to my email for so... by David Vicks on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:38:45 PM
If people are not educated by now thay will never ... by michael hersch on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:51:39 AM
The premise of this article has a flaw in my ... by Bill Johnson on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:54:43 AM
"We need to keep and maintain a productive manufac... by Jim Arnold on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:40:22 PM
I guess you have never heard of the United Nations... by Bill Johnson on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:02:18 PM
You're comparing a mandate from a virtual debating... by Jim Arnold on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:31:53 PM
I agree.. To think that taxing the really producti... by bern on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:27:47 PM
with lazy drunks and druggies. Millions of people ... by Jim Arnold on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:41:38 PM
The size of Government is irrelevant. It's what it... by David Vicks on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:04:57 PM
Don,One problem with modeling a takeover of the De... by Jim Arnold on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:47:29 PM
In my opinion progressives are looking at this all... by Bill Johnson on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:12:00 PM
let's acknowledge that the forces behind the TEA P... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Aug 27, 2011 at 7:25:03 AM
It's probably true that progressives won't be able... by Don Smith on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:11:54 PM
Some of you can demonize the tea party all you wan... by Bill Johnson on Sunday, Sep 4, 2011 at 11:30:29 PM
You have an inkling, Bill -- just an inkling of so... by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Sep 4, 2011 at 11:58:29 PM