Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  7
Share on Facebook
  22
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  28
57 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
20 comments

General News

HOMEOWNERS' REBELLION: COULD 62 MILLION HOMES BE FORECLOSURE-PROOF?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Valuable 3   News 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 8/20/10
Become a Fan
  (158 fans)

opednews.com

Over 62 million mortgages are now held in the name of MERS, an electronic recording system devised by and for the convenience of the mortgage industry. A California bankruptcy court, following landmark cases in other jurisdictions, recently held that this electronic shortcut makes it impossible for banks to establish their ownership of property titles--and therefore to foreclose on mortgaged properties. The logical result could be 62 million homes that are foreclosure-proof.

Mortgages bundled into securities were a popular investment at the height of the financial bubble leading up to the crash of 2008. The securities changed hands frequently, and the companies profiting from mortgage payments were often not the same parties that negotiated the loans. At the heart of this disconnect was the Mortgage Electronic Registration System, or MERS, a company that serves as the mortgagee of record for lenders, allowing properties to change hands without the necessity of recording each transfer.

MERS was convenient for the mortgage industry, but courts are now questioning the impact of all of this financial juggling when it comes to mortgage ownership. To foreclose on real property, the plaintiff must be able to establish the chain of title entitling it to relief. But MERS has acknowledged, and recent cases have held, that MERS is a mere "nominee"--an entity appointed by the true owner simply for the purpose of holding property in order to facilitate transactions. Recent court opinions stress that this defect is not just a procedural but is a substantive failure, one that is fatal to the plaintiff's legal ability to foreclose.

That means hordes of victims of predatory lending could end up owning their homes free and clear--while the financial industry could end up skewered on its own sword.

California Precedent

The latest of these court decisions came down in California on May 20, 2010, in a bankruptcy case called In re Walker, Case no. 10-21656-E11. The court held that MERS could not foreclose because it was a mere nominee; and that as a result, plaintiff Citibank could not collect on its claim. The judge opined:

Since no evidence of MERS' ownership of the underlying note has been offered, and other courts have concluded that MERS does not own the underlying notes, this court is convinced that MERS had no interest it could transfer to Citibank. Since MERS did not own the underlying note, it could not transfer the beneficial interest of the Deed of Trust to another. Any attempt to transfer the beneficial interest of a trust deed without ownership of the underlying note is void under California law.

In support, the judge cited In Re Vargas(California Bankruptcy Court);Landmark v. Kesler(Kansas Supreme Court);LaSalle Bank v. Lamy(a New York case); and I n Re Foreclosure Cases(the "Boyko" decision from Ohio Federal Court). (For more on these earlier cases, see here, here and here.) The court concluded:

Since the claimant, Citibank, has not established that it is the owner of the promissory note secured by the trust deed, Citibank is unable to assert a claim for payment in this case.

The broad impact the case could have on California foreclosures is suggested by attorney Jeff Barnes, who writes:

This opinion . . . serves as a legal basis to challenge any foreclosure in California based on a MERS assignment; to seek to void any MERS assignment of the Deed of Trust or the note to a third party for purposes of foreclosure; and should be sufficient for a borrower to not only obtain a TRO [temporary restraining order] against a Trustee's Sale, but also a Preliminary Injunction barring any sale pending any litigation filed by the borrower challenging a foreclosure based on a MERS assignment.

While not binding on courts in other jurisdictions, the ruling could serve as persuasive precedent there as well, because the court cited non-bankruptcy cases related to the lack of authority of MERS, and because the opinion is consistent with prior rulings in Idaho and Nevada Bankruptcy courts on the same issue.

What Could This Mean for Homeowners?

Earlier cases focused on the inability of MERS to produce a promissory note or assignment establishing that it was entitled to relief, but most courts have considered this a mere procedural defect and continue to look the other way on MERS' technical lack of standing to sue. The more recent cases, however, are looking at something more serious. If MERS is not the title holder of properties held in its name, the chain of title has been broken, and no one may have standing to sue. In MERS v. Nebraska Department of Banking and Finance, MERS insisted that it had no actionable interest in title, and the court agreed.

An August 2010 article in Mother Jones titled "Fannie and Freddie's Foreclosure Barons" exposes a widespread practice of "foreclosure mills" in backdating assignments after foreclosures have been filed. Not only is this perjury, a prosecutable offense, but if MERS was never the title holder,there is nothing to assign. The defaulting homeowners could wind up with free and clear title.

In Jacksonville, Florida, legal aid attorney April Charney has been using the missing-note argument ever since she first identified that weakness in the lenders' case in 2004. Five years later, she says, some of the homeowners she's helped are still in their homes. According to a Huffington Postarticle titled ""Produce the Note' Movement Helps Stall Foreclosures":

Because of the missing ownership documentation, Charney is now starting to file quiet title actions, hoping to get her homeowner clients full title to their homes (a quiet title action "quiets' all other claims). Charney says she's helped thousands of homeowners delay or prevent foreclosure, and trained thousands of lawyers across the country on how to protect homeowners and battle in court.

Criminal Charges?

Other suits go beyond merely challenging title to alleging criminal activity. On July 26, 2010, a class action was filed in Florida seeking relief against MERS and an associated legal firm for racketeering and mail fraud. It alleges that the defendants used "the artifice of MERS to sabotage the judicial process to the detriment of borrowers;" that "to perpetuate the scheme, MERS was and is used in a way so that the average consumer, or even legal professional, can never determine who or what was or is ultimately receiving the benefits of any mortgage payments;" that the scheme depended on "the MERS artifice and the ability to generate any necessary "assignment' which flowed from it;" and that "by engaging in a pattern of racketeering activity, specifically "mail or wire fraud,' the Defendants . . . participated in a criminal enterprise affecting interstate commerce."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of twelve books including the best-selling WEB OF DEBT. In THE PUBLIC BANK SOLUTION, her latest book, she explores successful public banking models historically and (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

It's the Derivatives, Stupid! Why Fannie, Freddie and AIG Had to Be Bailed Out

Mysterious Prison Buses in the Desert

LANDMARK DECISION PROMISES MASSIVE RELIEF FOR HOMEOWNERS AND TROUBLE FOR BANKS

Libya: All About Oil, or All About Central Banking?

Borrowing from Peter to Pay Paul: The Wall Street Ponzi Scheme Called Fractional Reserve Banking

"Oops, We Meant $7 TRILLION!" What Hank and Ben Are Up to and How They Plan to Pay for It All

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 20 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
But when I first heard a couple of years ago that ... by Carol Cleveland on Friday, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:41:45 PM
tendency to ignore the law and the facts to rule i... by Mark Adams on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:19:59 PM
tendency to ignore the law and the facts to rule i... by Mark Adams on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:28:11 PM
Ms Brown--My computer is not loading all the comme... by Carol Cleveland on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:49:51 AM
" ... strategem was extremely smart and clever in ... by John Bessa on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 7:55:17 AM
Hi, Mr. Bessa--I was able to read your entire post... by Carol Cleveland on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 9:24:50 AM
"The people in the houses are every bit as guilty ... by PrMaine on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:17:16 PM
By the time three or four mortgage payments are mi... by Ernest on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:08:25 PM
(unless we bought for cash) and that the local tax... by Carol Cleveland on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:32:22 PM
Buying your home with a mortgage is worst thing an... by Ernest on Sunday, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:58:09 AM
You know what! Even if your mom could buy her home... by Debbie S on Sunday, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:46:29 PM
I am a senior citizen with no bills and one credit... by macdon1 on Sunday, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:35:58 PM
You also made a good point!... by Debbie S on Sunday, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:03:32 PM
I agree that most bankers, brokers, buyers, etc. w... by Ellen Brown on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:56:34 PM
And I find your analysis of the attempt of plutocr... by Carol Cleveland on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:40:52 PM
There is considerable irony that the American bank... by PrMaine on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:47:24 PM
America was built upon lies, and ending with lies.... by Debbie S on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:16:20 PM
Oh goody goody goody! I really hope the greedy blo... by macdon1 on Saturday, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:46:05 PM
Neil Garfield posted my article and answered some ... by Ellen Brown on Monday, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:57:27 PM
Ellen says "I agree that most bankers, brokers, bu... by John Bessa on Tuesday, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:59:42 AM