![]() |
|
|
November 19, 2008 at 19:41:44
by Ginger McClemons Page 1 of 2 page(s) |
|
|
A friend and I sat having breakfast recently when the subject of the election came up. We spoke of how everyone we knew was elated over the Obama win, even overseas people were rejoicing. We also talked about the possibility that the entire election process was just another lie perpetrated on the American people. Huh? What? Never happen? A Stupid Idea, you say? Perhaps. Yet, when you think about it, It all seemed so faked. I don't understand why the Republican party couldn't have come up with someone better than an aging politician with no real ideas on how to fix the Bush created problems; Indeed, a man that chose as his running mate an unknown woman from Alaska, a woman whose main role was to pacify those hoping to elect a woman, like Hilary? Could it have all been just be a ploy?
And, Sarah Palin, poor fool that she is, was used by them, they knowing that she was expendable, and that there was never any real chance of them winning, or that chance being so minimal as to be nil.
Yet, there had to be a show so that the people would feel as though they had a part in the selection, that their voice was being heard. And, what a show it was. More money was spent on this election than any election in our history. Was it ever really a contest? Who knows? We may never know.
However, Sarah Palin didn't deserve to be used in such a way. But, that's politics for you. I believe McCain knew. He had to know. It was all so beautifully orchestrated. I believe McCain was in on it and that he was well paid for his part. His family will be well cared for after his death for many years to come. Which, by the way, is not too far off, a fact that he and they (the Republican Party) were all well aware of, no doubt.
I think the Republican Party knew they had no chance of winning. Bush had killed any possibility of that. So, they pick a man to stand in and give the American people a show they will not forget for a long time, a show that will make them feel good and keep them from realizing it was all a sham. A sham because Obama has already shown that he will be utilizing those who were running against him, like Hilary Clinton, and Lieberman. Let's just keep it in the family. The reporters are all saying how smart these moves are. Maybe. But it seems a bit strange that he is choosing the very people who have spoken out against him. Is this to appease them so they will be thankful and more likely to fall in line? Or perhaps, it was all prearranged.
I'm glad that Obama won, as if there was any doubt. He is brilliant and I believed he would make an excellent president. But, I can't get over the feeling that we have, once again, had the wool pulled over our eyes. It could just be that nagging doubt I have come to expect from the politicians that have been lying to us for so long. Things just don't add up.
Of all the people the Republicans had to choose from they choose an aging man in his seventies, suffering from skin cancer and an unknown woman with no real experience and a lot of personal problems that remain unexplained to the satisfaction of the American people. Is it her baby? I doubt it. Any woman who has had as many babies as Palin has can't go through a pregnancy without anyone knowing about it. The muscles don't retain their original shape after being stretched out so many times. I know, I've had four myself and I was a demon when it came to exercising to regain my former shape. Never happened. Each successive pregnancy was harder and harder to hide. Did her daughter keep this secret info from her? Probably, this would account for the late announcement of "her" pregnancy, a pregnancy that not one of her staff knew about: Which means she lied. And, then there's the "library issue...book banning", and the stuff about...well, you get the idea. Palin was just too radical in her ideals. Stack her and "Lumpy" up against the perfect family that Obama appears to have and Biden and the choice is simple.
Palin, with a pregnant unwed teenager, maybe for the second time and preparing for a shotgun wedding to an unwilling teenage boy, a baby with special needs, (when will she find time to do her vice presidential duties once she learns what they are?) OR, Obama, a man of superior intellect with two beautiful, well behaved, un-pregnant, girls who obviously respect their parents.
I, for one, just couldn't envision a woman with five kids, one a special needs baby, being that close to the Presidency. Has the Republican Party lost its mind or was this really the best they could come up with? It was like a tower of cards. Sooner or later bound to topple, perhaps bringing down the country with it. Palin's lust for power is well known and poor McCain may have soon felt the way Caesar felt when Brutus plunged the knife into his back. Et tu, Palin? Palin has a tendency to eliminate those in her way.
In the end it was no surprise to McCain that he lost. He graciously ceded to Obama and that was that. Palin looked to be on the verge of crying. She had set her high hopes on an unattainable prize that was ripped away from her in the end. All through the election process the McCain camp continued to build her hopes to keep her in the game. All for what, another fat lie to keep up appearances? Would she have been so "Gosh darn betcha" willing to continue the façade if she had been aware of the fraud?
Okay, I might be wrong. And, I hope I am. However, my belief in our political system has been gravely shaken. The Bushites' election fraud left a bad taste in my mouth that I may never get rid of. We were played like pawns in an overly long game of chess.
Obama is now our hope for a better future. I pray he isn't taken in by the crooks that are so clever at hiding within our political folds. But, then again, I hope he isn't one of the crooks. I was hoping he was going to do something about the Bushites, only now, it appears, he is going to let this slide into the 'past of forgotten deeds'. Was he being groomed by the Bushies? They don't actually care anything about parties, they only wanted the control.
Did they pull another one over our eyes, knowing we were not about to elect another Republican anytime soon, did they put up someone they had been grooming for the position > Someone who would keep them safe from prosecution while at the same time giving the people some hope for a better future?
1 | 2
Native American Woman seeking changes in our present day political system.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 7 comments |
|
Doubts
Ginger, I hope you're wrong but am afraid you are right. I voted for Obama because I felt I had no choice. It was clear in the primaries that the corporate media was marginalizing those candidates who might actually bring about change. I think they would have been okay with either Clinton or Obama. Obama is now filling his cabinet with people who are not about change, some of whom are probably war criminals. He may let Bush and company off the hook for their mass murder and torture. Obama is bought and paid for by AIPAC and received a lot of corporate money. It is highly unlikely that our corporate masters would simply roll over and let a real change agent get into the presidency. We may need to hit the streets right away over the same issues we opposed in the Bush administration. Looking at Obama's actions before even becoming president does suggest that we have been bamboozled. by Bob Trowbridge (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 70 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:52:07 PM
|
|
no one pulled a fast one
the populace was not sold a bill of goods. they demanded that bill of goods. obama has been open re his beliefs and intentions. no one who voted for the man has any reason to be disappointed. he let you know what was to be. he never ever led you to believe there would be peace or plenty. you voted for him anyway. obama was groomed for his role. not well-groomed because his empty rhetoric and showmanship was painfully obvious. to some. it is important that he is a person of color. we cannot now criticize him without being labeled racist. much like criticizing israel earns one the anti-semitic 'stigma'. personally i am immune to such stigmas. i firmly believe that a black man can be just as evil as a white man. or more so. bread & circuses wins this round. there may or may not be another round to go. can't seem to awaken the left... by Peggy Nicholson (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 40 comments [15 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:10:08 PM
|
|
YES I DO!
I never understood Obama before the primaries: his promises and projections were so very vague while his rhetoric was invigorating. Then he won the primaries and immediately did some backtracking on a few progressive issues, or as some put it, " made a turn to the right." That did it for me-- so much for trust. From then on, I weighed what he said, but watched what he did: became pro-immunity for telecoms, pro-Paulson's Folly, pro-surge-was-wildly successful, pro-I-love-the-market, pro-offshore drilling............et cetera. How about the staff and cabinet appointments so far, such as Emanuel? I don't see anything remotely progressive about this administration-to-be. Not even a progressive potential appointee yet. Then there is foreign policy. Negotiations as a first response rather than preemptive wars sound good to me. But why is Obama's camp still touting the rigid black-and-white mentality of US GOOD/RUSSIA, VENEZUELA, BOLIVIA, IRAN, SYRIA BAD? Such beliefs are simplistic, naive, and get the U.S. into trouble all the time. I'm not counting too much on Obama for the kind of change I would like to see. However, I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised. by Linda Carraway (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 7 comments) on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:11:46 PM
|
|
kINDA MAKES YOU WONDER..
Don't it? by Ginger McClemons (17 articles, 1 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 103 comments [26 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:53:28 PM
|
|
Crikey!
Ginger! Yer makin ma skin crawl, Girl! All seriousness aside, why would Republicans allow themselves to be used in order for the Democrats to galvanize & inspire the world? I dunno...my shadowy self is creeping up on me. Could it be a diversion while the Republicans finish looting the country? Say it isn't so, Virginia, I meann Ginger. by dick overfield (26 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 64 comments [15 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:08:39 PM
|
|
Shhhhhhh....
You were not suposed to notice... The greatest gap between the "haves" and the "have nots" was during the Depression. My father grew up in the last depression. He told me those with debt sufferred the most because there were no jobs to pay back the loans. It explains why he lived his entire life using credit only once to buy a house and paid it off as soon as practicle. I hope you have studied well and prepared... by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 990 comments [34 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Friday, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:52:04 AM
|
|
Hmmm
I beginning to lose that doubt now. Now, I beginning to feel positive that we have been had. by Ginger McClemons (17 articles, 1 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 103 comments [26 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:16:37 AM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |