Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Funding and coordinating progressive news

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 1   Inspiring 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 6/24/09

Become a Fan
  (21 fans)

Progressives need to build a strong, respected alternative news media that can overcome the intransigence and biases of mainstream media outlets.   

As Richmond Shreve pointed out in his recent OpEdNews article, the sort of non-professional stories, op-eds, links, and diaries that typically appear on OpEdNews are valuable but insufficient. Ultimately,  progressives also need professional journalists trained to do research, fact-checking, and writing. Of course, investigative reporting takes lots of time and skills, and the journalists need to earn a living.

Two things stand in the way establishing a strong progressive news media:   1. Funding and  2. Coordination.


Shreve's article sketched some options for fee-based funding. Another funding option is taxation.  Progressives believe in public schools, public transportation, federal conservation programs, national health care, and other sorts of tax-funded, joint endeavors. So, it makes sense that progressives should be open to tax-funded news.   The BBC in Great Britain is a model for such a system. (Perhaps someone more familiar with the BBC can comment on how it works.)

It is essential that structures and laws be put in place that protect such a tax-funded news media from political interference.

By the way, tax-funded news could work both nationally and locally.

A disadvantage of using taxes to fund news is that progressives wouldn't then control it!  That is, like other progressives, I want a news source that tilts to the left.  However, I value truth above partisanship, and I don't want too much of a leftward bias.

The alternatives to taxes are, so far, unreliable or untested:  ads, donations, subscriptions, and reliance on rich benefactors.  See this article for further thoughts on this topic.


While much ink (and many electrons) have been spent considering how to fund journalism in the Internet age, very little thought and effort have been directed, I believe, at the second issue: how to coordinate progressive news and messaging.

There already are numerous progressive news sites and blogs, as well as hundreds of progressive organizations, all competing with each other for donations, readers, and influence.  Unless the Left can coordinate their  activities, their influence and viability will be greatly reduced.  Coordination will ease the problem of funding, will increase the coherence of the messaging, and will increase market share.

Daily I get email from a dozen or so progressive groups, but already I've had to withdraw from some groups: I can't handle the volume and can't endure the constant requests for money.    Locally, there's no standard online progressive news source; instead, there are multiple competing sites, none very successful.

Consider, in contrast, how successful conservatives have been -- until recently, at least -- at coordinating the diverse factions of the conservative movement: libertarians, neoconservatives, (often corrupt) capitalists, and the Religious Right. These factions often disagree vehemently on issues -- for example, libertarians can't stand the necons and the Religious Right. Nonetheless, when it comes to communicating with the public, conservatives stay on message ("small government", "no new taxes", "pro life", "fight terrorism", "strong family", "stop government waste"). Furthermore, Republicans' party discipline in Congress is impressive: often they vote unanimously, even nowadays when their movement is so damaged. 

The conservative movement has Fox News and right-wing AM talk radio, such as with Rush Limbaugh.  

Alas, the influence of conservative ideas greatly outweighs the reasonableness of those ideas.  The Left needs to fight back, so that the public and lawmakers can hear our messages and also so that we can talk coherently to each other.

Next Page  1  |  2



DFA organizer, Democratic Precinct Committee Officer, writer, and programmer. My op-ed pieces have appeared in the Seattle Times, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and elsewhere. See http://WALiberals.org and http://TruthSite.org for my writing, my (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The myth that the Dems are as bad as the Repugs

Failure to prosecute: why Obama is having trouble passing health care reform

Why Abortion Isn't Murder

Undividing the Left: Hard-core and Soft-core progressives

The Battle over I-1098 in Washington State

"They're out to get us!" On trust, distrust, and organizing for change


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Don, I think you make some good points here about ... by Mikhail Lyubansky on Wednesday, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:58:54 PM
Its nice to say we should have politically funded ... by liberalsrock on Thursday, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:39:37 AM
You're right that there is a risk of political int... by Don Smith on Thursday, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:35:52 AM
   The conservatives were successful bec... by Richard Lee on Thursday, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:49:44 PM