Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats

OpEdNews Op Eds

FISA Judge Who Approved Massive NSA Spying Identified?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 10   Valuable 6   News 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 6/30/13

Become a Fan
  (275 fans)

The Washington Post has a new article out, 
Secret-court judges upset at portrayal of "collaboration' with government.

And the article does report that the judge was annoyed that the idea of collaborating with the government was an inaccurate portrayal. 

But it seems that the bigger story is that this judge is THE judge, who, all alone, decided that it was okay for the NSA and whoever else had access, to spy on ALL Americans. Her name is  Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

Colleen Kollar-Kotelly by Wikipedia

Here's the excerpt from the WaPo article that is most significant:
On July 14, 2004, the surveillance court for the first time approved the gathering of information by the NSA, which created the equivalent of a digital vault to hold Internet metadata. Kollar-Kotelly's order authorized the metadata program under a FISA provision known as the "pen register/trap and trace," or PRTT.
The ruling was a secret not just to the public and most of Congress, but to all of Kollar-Kotelly's surveillance court colleagues. Under orders from the president, none of the court's other 10 members could be told about the Internet metadata program, which was one prong of a larger and highly classified data-gathering effort known as the President's Surveillance Program, or PSP.
But the importance of her order -- which approved the collection based on a 1986 law typically used for phone records -- was hard to overstate.

"The order essentially gave NSA the same authority to collect bulk Internet metadata that it had under the PSP," the inspector general's report said, with some minor caveats including reducing the number of people who could access the records.

On May 24, 2006, Kollar-Kotelly signed another order, this one authorizing the bulk collection of phone metadata from U.S. phone companies, under a FISA provision known as Section 215, or the "business records provision," of the USA Patriot Act. "

A 2006 Washingtonpost article also mentions Kollar-Kotelly, so the news is not a first time revelation of her tie to the authorization. The older article also refers to her predecessor,  Royce C. Lamberth and suggests that they had serious concerns about the legality of the program, instituted when George W. Bush was president;
" Both judges expressed concern to senior officials that the president's program, if ever made public and challenged in court, ran a significant risk of being declared unconstitutional, according to sources familiar with their actions. Yet the judges believed they did not have the authority to rule on the president's power to order the eavesdropping, government sources said, and focused instead on protecting the integrity of the FISA process.
It was an odd position for the presiding judges of the FISA court, the secret panel created in 1978 in response to a public outcry over warrantless domestic spying by J. Edgar Hoover's FBI. The court's appointees, chosen by then-Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, were generally veteran jurists with a pro-government bent, and their classified work is considered a powerful tool for catching spies and terrorists."

Perhaps this judge has been portrayed unfairly, as collaborating with the government. But more important, it seems to put a face-- THE face-- on the American who decided it was okay to spy on every other American. 

Regardless of her raising of concerns, she went ahead and, with her unique power, as head of the secretive FISA Court, made an even more secret decision to approve the worse spying in the history of America. In spite of evidence of abuses, that the 2006 WaPo article reported, she went ahead and approved further, more egregious and aggressive spying. It looks like she never said no, when asked. 

She should be called before congress and questioned. And she should be more worried about what she DID than what is said about her so far. There is  no question that she did approve the horrific level of spying we now know the NSA engages in.

The question is, how did any protector of the citizens-- the duty of every elected and appointed government official, ever allow a single person to make such an important decision-- and who decided to keep it secret? Because they violated their oath and should be punished to the full extent of the law.


Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and website architect of, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), and publisher of, President of Futurehealth, Inc, and an inventor . He is also published regularly on the

Listen to over 200 of Rob's Podcast interviews here.

Rob is, with the first media winner of the Pillar Award for supporting Whistleblowers and the first amendment.

With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom-up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey and Positive Psychology. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. Watch me speaking on Bottom up economics at the Occupy G8 Economic Summit, here.

See more Rob Kall articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about Rob and, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article. For Rob's work in non-political realms mostly before 2000, see his C.V..

And here's a one hour radio interview where I was a guest- on Envision This, on 10/23/13. And here is the transcript. 

And Rob's quotes are here.

To watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, former Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video.

Rob's radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at Or listen to it streaming, live at

Rob also hosted a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Libertarian Legacy? Ron Paul's Campaign Manager, 49, Dies Uninsured, Of Pneumonia, Leaving family $400,000 Debt

Interview: McCain Fellow Hanoi Hilton POW & Naval Academy Dorm-mate; Why He Won't Vote For McCain


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
19 people are discussing this page, with 23 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The POTUS cannot order the least of judges in the ... by John Reed on Sunday, Jun 30, 2013 at 5:44:45 PM
In theory, we are also a democracy. So much for t... by Shireen Parsons on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:53:11 AM
This seems very strange:    "Both judg... by BFalcon on Tuesday, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:22:37 AM
DID THEN NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR REQUEST FROM TH... by Dianne Shatin on Sunday, Jun 30, 2013 at 7:25:36 PM
...but that was not who was responsible for it. Th... by Philip Zack on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:15:26 AM
Couldn't agree with you more. What we have is a co... by Deborah Dills on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:35:46 PM
You have every justification to criticize today's ... by Rob Kall on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:33:55 PM
the forthcoming evidence. Muslims had every right ... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:44:16 PM
This is such a grotesque travesty of our constitut... by S. Juniper on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:46:51 AM
Confirms that to be a lawyer in America is to be a... by Pesky Brewer on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:35:22 AM
This judges "finding" is NOT absolute nor binding.... by Daniel Penisten on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:22:44 PM
The gall of this judge to be upset after authorizi... by Rudy Avizius on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:08:39 PM
"The American press exists for one purpose only, a... by Ethan Hollow on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:34:35 PM
Thanks for picking up on this. Other news aggregat... by Carol Davidek-Waller on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:10:34 PM
She should be tried for treason against the Consti... by Archie on Monday, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:41:37 PM
what they want; is it any surprise that the desire... by Paul Repstock on Tuesday, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:13:22 AM
No matter what we say or write, we (the non-elite)... by Gloria Grening Wolk on Tuesday, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:15:46 AM
First off, she and the entire panel of judges on t... by K V Ramani on Tuesday, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:31:20 AM
All search warrants are issued ex parte with extre... by John Reed on Wednesday, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:15:00 AM
I take your point, but only in respect of search w... by K V Ramani on Wednesday, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:27:35 AM
See my first comment above.  The Constitution... by John Reed on Wednesday, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:50:15 PM
with you, John. The Patriot Act and NDAA should ne... by K V Ramani on Wednesday, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:49:16 PM
She's been outed already.... by Vernon Balmer Jr. on Tuesday, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:21:50 PM