![]() |
| Home | Hot News | Economic Crisis | Barack Obama | Impeachment | Election Integrity | LGBT Gay | Media | Business - Economics | Edges | Government | Religions |
| Life Arts Science | Security WMDs Terror | Rights Justice Democracy | Obama transition | Veterans Military | Torture Guantanamo | Barack Obama Family, et | Iraq Afghanistan Pakista | MiddleEast |
|
Tags for This Article:
Election-Voting Issues (2078) Voting Machines (1513) Voting Laws Federal HAVA (1257) Election Reform (1119) Elections And Campaigns (546) Voter Fraud (485) Elections_Campaigns (479) Election-Voting Issues News (434) Election Law (389) Election Systems And Software (223) Election Technology Reports (154) Voters Bill Of Rights (81) 2008 Election Local (69)
|
(more...)
(less...)
Add to My Group
A recap of this Tuesday's election in Florida sounds eerily familiar. Sarasota can't count votes. Only this time there's paper to prove it. And this time they can't blame the voters for Florida's failed voting systems. Although the cause of this failure is different than those in 2006, as are the voting machines. The recovery is vastly different. This time instead of denying the problem exists and holding out for court fisticuffs, they scooped up our paper ballots and simply counted them by hand. Problem solved? No. In at least three Florida counties, Election Supervisors responded to their voting machine failures with all the seriousness and responsibility of a third grader's, "The dog ate my homework [that Daddy Diebold did]."
These statements demonstrate a troubling misunderstanding of the seriousness and complexities of the responsibilities entrusted to our election officials. But perhaps the most revealing and disconcerting statement came from Kathy Rogers, vice president of government affairs for Premier Election Solutions. Rogers said, "We did not prepare this county in advance." Yes, Diebold/Premier sold a product that didn't count votes in Tuesday's election. Not the first time. But Florida Secretary of State Kurt Browning who tests and certifies the machines before the counties acquire them, found nothing wrong with the machines. Sarasota County's Elections Supervisor Kathy Dent found nothing wrong with the machines. Hillsborough County's Elections Supervisor Buddy Johnson found nothing wrong with the machines. Did they even turn the machines on? Or perhaps that step wasn't included in the test instructions provided by Premier. "We did not prepare this county in advance." You may already understand why this simple comment is so disturbing. If not, please take a look at Lou Dobbs and Kitty Pilgrim's "Democracy at Risk – Outsourcing Elections" interview of Ellen Theisen. And read Ellen Theisen's report, "Vendors are Undermining the Structure of U.S. Elections." Both can be found on VotersUnite.org. Also, for troubling findings by the GAO, check my article on OpEdNews, "A closer look at the GAO's Florida District 13. No smoking gun...Not if but when and how often." News sources referenced: "Voting problems plague Sarasota," by STACEY EIDSON, The Bradenton Herald, 08/28/08click here style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial"> "Company Accepts Blame For Hillsborough Election Glitch," by ELLEN GEDALIUSThe Tampa Tribune, 08/28/08, http://www.sarasotaspeaks.com/node/26922
www.BallotsOfStraw.com Author of suspense novel A MARGIN OF ERROR: BALLOTS OF STRAW, 2008. Former manager of election systems for a county in Florida. Career IT manager, software developer, computer security.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2009 |