Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 20 (20 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   10 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

ES&S Acquires Premier Election Solutions. This is just wrong on so many levels.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Group(s): ; ; ; (more...), Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 9/4/09

Become a Fan
  (1 fan)


When Voting News reported on on ES&S acquiring Premier Election Solutions, they commented, "Monopoly anyone?" But this acquisition is just wrong on so many levels.

Yes, the monopoly. ES&S's website boasts that ES&S voting systems counted approximately 50% of the votes in the last four major elections. 67 million registered voters vote on ES&S machines. 97K iVotronic touch screens are installed in 20 states and approximately 30K scanner tabulators are installed in 43 states and worldwide. While Premier Election Solutions (Diebold) Global Election Management System (GEMS) is used in more than 1,000 election environments throughout North America.

While the acquisition of Premier indeed adds munitions to ES&S's arsenal. The monopoly is but a part of the troubling equation.

Consider the Government Accountability Office's (GOA) stunted investigation of Sarasota's 2006 District 13 with its 18,000 missing votes. While the investigation fizzled with inconclusive results and investigative paths not taken, the initial findings of the investigation revealed an end-to-end ES&S election process lacking good business practices and void of independent checks and balances. ES&S virtually owns the election process. ES&S manufactures the machines, produces test data, defines the testing process, counts the votes, determines the winner, and declares the election valid. While Florida's Secretary of State and Sarasota's Supervisor of Elections simply follow the ES&S directions. (1)

Consider the absence of election laws and comprehensive processes that recognize bogus election results and mandate clear and immediate corrective action. This void has actually enabled election blunders since 2000.

More importantly, the lapse in business standards in tandem with the absence of such laws make it all the more possible for a lone techie, a company insider to slip some crafty little program code into the election program mix. As long as this techie stays smart and keeps the win within the margin of error he or she can effectively alter and even spot control election results.

Consider the technical challenges experienced by these two companies. Nine states reported voting problems with their Diebold equipment, including: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Iowa, Maryland, Ohio, Utah, Virginia. Eight states reported problems with their ES&S voting equipment: Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, Wisconsin, and West Virginia. And five states reported voting problems with both ES&S and Diebold voting equipment: Florida, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas. (2)

Consider the ES&S technical problems the GAO did not find and why. GOA's Sarasota investigation fizzled when they wrapped up the investigation by testing only two working machines to assess whether touch screen miscalibration failures caused Sarasota's improbable results. Ironically, the GAO didn't investigate the statewide Attorney General race in which the evidence was abundant and convincing. As in Sarasota race, the ES&S touch screens in Attorney General race incurred a statistically improbable undervote of 137K or 8.65%. All other voting machines including ES&S scanners registered undervotes within normal ranges (2.72 to 3.04%). (3)

Throughout it all, ES&S failed to disclose, failed to accept responsibility, and consistently failed to produce a product that accurately counts our votes. All this and we keep buying their machines and now ES&S is rewarded with a bigger market share.

"Monopoly anyone?"

(1) A closer look at the GAO's Florida District 13. No smoking gun...Not if but when and how often. Could Red be next?

(2) Please note, this is only a partial list of voting errors retrieved from information provided by and does not include any errors occurring prior to October 2008. If your state or voting machine isn't listed here, check the complete report at Voters Unite.)

(3) 1.5 million total ballots were cast on ES&S iVotronic touchscreens in 11 Florida counties. 137K of these electronic ballots, resulted in no votes being counted for Attorney General. An undervote rate of 8.65%. (2)

730K paper ballots were counted on ES&S optical scanners in 21 Florida counties. Of these 730K paper ballots, there were only 22K undervotes for Attorney General. An undervote rate of 3.04%. (Note: Sequoia's touchscreen undervote rate was 3.0%. Diebold's optical ballot scanner undervote rate was 2.72%.) (2).

We are indebted to Florida Fair Elections Coalition for the extensive research and data collected as presented their comprehensive, "Florida's Vanished Votes Reports." The reports can be found on


Author of A MARGIN OF ERROR: BALLOTS OF STRAW, featured in "Small Press Bookwatch" - Politics is a tough career, with more knives in (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

ES&S Acquires Premier Election Solutions. This is just wrong on so many levels.

Who's minding your mom? And who's STEALING her DRUGS? The next generation of elder abuse.

Should Health Insurance be Mandatory? You're Only 20 or 30, Why?

2,261,000 Stolen Votes & Counting. ES&S: “A time bomb waiting to go off.”

Conspiracy, coincidence, or skullduggery?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Even if there were no incidents calling into quest... by Maxwell on Friday, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:31:28 PM
Yes, Maxwell. The list of documented voting failur... by Lani Massey Brown on Friday, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:15:15 PM
Read through the headlines any day here and it is ... by lila york on Friday, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:04:02 PM
Me too! :>( Plus I was left with the impression... by Lani Massey Brown on Saturday, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:08:43 AM
I tried to fight the vote fraud on the local level... by Mr Stq on Friday, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:33:21 PM
This is such a sad commentary. Unfortunately there... by Lani Massey Brown on Saturday, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:30:41 AM
http://www.foavc.orgthe framers wrote a convention... by john de herrera on Saturday, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:36:42 PM
Unlike the reams of headlines that would be genera... by Peter Dearman on Saturday, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:16:32 PM
I know! Why do you suppose that is? I've a couple ... by Lani Massey Brown on Sunday, Sep 6, 2009 at 1:06:25 PM
Incompetent, overworked and RUSHED programmers/eng... by Lani Massey Brown on Monday, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:01:18 PM


Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum