OpEdNews Op Eds

Dipsy Doodle: What "Globalization" Has Wrought

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 1/30/14

Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
- Advertisement -
 Go to source

Why the rise of right-wing populism in America and Europe?


(image by Branko Milanovic, lWorld Bank)   DMCA
by  Branko Milanovic, lead economist of the World Bank's research department, via  Derek Thompson in The Atlantic

This graph requires some explanation. You've got, first of all, to resist the impulse to see the x-axis (horizontal) as a time line. This chart is a snapshot of the result after twenty years.
- Advertisement -


As Derek Thompson describes it: "Imagine you lined up every human being in the world by income, divided them into 100 groups ("percentiles") ranging from lowest to highest, and asked: How has the last generation of economic growth been for you?"

This is a graph of real income growth over twenty years for each income percentile of the entire world's population. The x-axis (horizontal) is not a progression over time. You'll get confused if you read it that way. It is just represents the different income percentiles or the world's population. The y-axis (vertical) represents the net total growth in real income for each percentile over the twenty-years. So the third dot on the line indicates that the people in the bottom 15% of the world's population saw their inflation-adjusted incomes grow about 57%. From the bottom 15% to about 50% of the world's population saw significant (up to 80%) income growth. These would be the populations of the developing countries, especially the BRICs. 

From about the 80th percentile (the top 20% of the world's incomes) to the 86th percentile (the top 14%) there has been a net decline in real income. Then you see another sharp (60%) increase for the top one percent, and especially the highest tiers therein, of the world's incomes. (That's about  $130,000,  which would be the income of the top 11-12% U.S. households.)

So a lot of people in developing countries, who have obtained new jobs and incomes in the world capitalist economy -- by some combination of the export of the developed world's capital, the increase of investment by indigenous elites, and the entrance into the capitalist wage economy of the ex- and putatively-still-"communist" states - have seen their incomes increase by the World Bank's calculations. That does not, it's important to remember, mean they are living high on the hog, just that  their newly-acquired sweatshop wages put significantly more money than zero in their pockets.  

The big losers, on the other hand, are the sectors of the world's population that had decent  incomes,  a few notches above average -- the kind of income that allowed for homes and vacations, but not limousines and villas. It's not hard to figure who they are; they're the people on the streets in Athens, Madrid, and Paris, in the state capitol in Wisconsin, and those losing their pensions in Detroit.

As Joe Wiesenthal puts it, at Business Insider:
In the chart you can see how lower income percentiles have seen monster growth since the late '80s. This growth represents the emerging economies and the rise of the Chinese middle class. Then you have the developed world middle class, which has seen almost no real income growth over the last few decades (which probably explains a lot of the current angst over inequality). And then you have the rise of the ultra-elite, the global 1%, which has done fantastically well during all this time.
Thus, this graph partly answers the question: W hy the rise of right-wing populism in America and Europe?

The other part of the answer to that question is contained in the sad vacuum at the end of this one: Who, in the "liberal" sectors of the political and media establishments of the "developed world," actually speaks and works for the "lower middle classes" in their own countries?
- Advertisement -

 

http://www.thepolemicist.net

Former college professor, native and denizen of New York City. Blogging at www.thepolemicist.net, aiming to be intellectually rigorous, politically challenging, and occasionally snarky, from a left-socialist perspective.


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel's "Human Shield" Hypocrisy

The Rifle on the Wall: A Left Argument for Gun Rights

Charge of the Right Brigade: Ukraine and the Dynamics of Capitalist Insurrection

Edward Snowden, Lawrence O'Donnell, and the Failure of Fuzzy Land Thinking

Flight Club: The No-Fly List and the Authoritarian Theater of the Absurd

The New Privateers: Civil Forfeiture, Police Piracy, and the Third-Worldization of America

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

In May 1974 the UN voted on and passed resolution... by Bill Johnson on Thursday, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:43:16 AM
Seems to me that HW Bush was the biggest an of th... by Paul Repstock on Thursday, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:48:58 AM
The problem is the way it was done, by betraying t... by Derryl Hermanutz on Thursday, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:22:24 PM
>"The issue here is who owns and operates Amer... by Paul Repstock on Thursday, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:22:12 PM
__This is why Bush Jr.CheneyRumsfeld team of preda... by jean labrek on Thursday, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:35:17 PM
People don''t pay much attention to UN General A... by Jim Kavanagh on Thursday, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:58:30 AM
Of course, there's absolutely nothing wrong with ... by Jim Kavanagh on Saturday, Feb 1, 2014 at 2:26:44 PM