Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   12 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Constitutional Rubbish

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 5/15/09

Become a Fan
  (15 fans)
- Advertisement -

Americans need a civics lesson.  And so do politicians.  Of all the wrong and delusional thinking about the US Constitution the one that is most thoroughly incorrect and routinely used for political propaganda purposes is that there are three coequal branches of the federal government.

You hear presidents, members of Congress and media pundits say it all the time.  They are wrong.  Nowhere in the Constitution or the Federalist Papers is there any statement or declaration that the three branches are coequal.  Why has this myth persisted for so long?  Why do so many prominent and supposedly educated people keep invoking this outright lie?

Make no mistake.  Either in theory or practice is there any basis whatsoever for believing that the legislative, executive and judicial branches of the federal government are coequal.  It also defies common sense.

Historical analysis has always shown that the Founders, if anything, intended for Congress to be preeminent, and not the President and the executive branch.  For example, only Congress has the constitutional power to remove the President and other high officers of the executive branch as well as the judiciary, but the latter cannot remove any member of Congress.  And Congress has control of raising and spending government funds as well as the power to overrule any presidential attempt to veto legislation.  That Congress does not always choose to fully exercise its constitutional powers does not remove them.

As to the Supreme Court and the whole judiciary, they function only as long as Congress provides funds, the executive branch provides security, and both choose to obey court decisions.  More importantly, the Supreme Court does not act on its own to enforce the Constitution, even when the President and Congress disobey it, but it could.

It is time for Americans to stop and think.  In what exact ways are the three branches coequal?  According to the dictionary coequal means resembling each other in all respects. But ridding the culture of constitutional myths seems awfully difficult, especially since Garry Wills published his excellent book “A Necessary Evil” a decade ago, which artfully exposed a number of them.

- Advertisement -

In particular, presidents seem to like talking about the coequal branches of government, including Barack Obama.  In January 2008 Obama said this in a speech: “No law can give Congress a backbone if it refuses to stand up as the co-equal branch the Constitution made it.”  Do presidents really want coequal branches?  I think not.  But they want Americans to keep believing in coequality, because it sounds good and adds an aura of respect for government that politicians desperately want.

In reality, presidents with the most political power want others with far less power to feel good.  They want to keep the public believing (incorrectly) that the president is very limited in power.  If George W. Bush proved anything it was not just that he created the imperial presidency, but that over time the presidency has become a mostly unchecked, pre-eminent and over-powerful government force.  They have accumulated far more powers than ever envisioned by the Constitution.  By regularly invoking the false coequality of branches argument and its derivative checks and balances thesis, presidents intentionally spread the propaganda to safeguard an all-powerful presidency and executive branch.

Meanwhile, Americans are largely ignorant that Congress has refused to honor and obey an important constitutional option in Article V: a convention of state delegates that could propose constitutional amendments, despite over 750 applications from all 50 states for a convention.  It is their way of preserving exclusivity for proposing amendments and presidents say nothing because they fear amendments curbing their power.  The Supreme Court does nothing because it likes amending the Constitution through its decisions.

Understand this: Having distinct constitutional responsibilities does not make branches coequal.  The myth of coequality protects our delusional democracy and makes a mockery of our constitutional republic.  If people really want coequal branches then they should start thinking about a constitutional amendment to make it so.  Alternatively, we need Congress and the judiciary to act with far greater strength and conviction to use their constitutional powers and more effectively constrain presidential powers.

If prominent people tell a lie enough times, again, and again, and again, then the public lie becomes accepted fact, a cultural myth.  So it is with the three coequal branches of government lie.  It will be defended.  It serves a purpose: False confidence in constitutional government.


Wake Up!

- Advertisement -

 

http://articlev.wix.com/statusquobuster

Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government. His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Americans Unready to Revolt, Despite Revolting Conditions

Entering a Hospital and On Medicare? The One Question You Must Always Ask

9/11 Truth Manifesto

Tea Party Terrorists

The Most Powerful People in America

Fight Economic Oppression, Target the Top One Percent

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The other thing everyone forgets is that this is a... by siriusss on Friday, May 15, 2009 at 9:46:28 AM
Yes, Congress was to be the most powerful branch, ... by William Whitten on Friday, May 15, 2009 at 10:24:47 AM
the people of this country have abdicated their re... by siriusss on Friday, May 15, 2009 at 11:50:46 AM
"I am mindful of the difference between the e... by Sister Begonia on Friday, May 15, 2009 at 12:00:15 PM
..the press was assured too...? nah...heeza gum... by William Whitten on Friday, May 15, 2009 at 2:11:08 PM
Hmmm...no, rumor has it that it was held in double... by Sister Begonia on Friday, May 15, 2009 at 3:27:24 PM
Trailing Begonia, you made me laugh. Ain't tha... by shirley reese on Friday, May 15, 2009 at 3:59:55 PM
..."yield more power"...Shirly It seems that sh... by William Whitten on Friday, May 15, 2009 at 7:32:20 PM
U.S. Constitution - Article III, section 2, third ... by Nemo on Friday, May 15, 2009 at 9:53:47 PM
The classic reason why the piecemeal single-amendm... by Arthur M. Howard-(Scotoni) on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 1:52:36 AM
  OK, so the Constitution does specify greate... by mary sunshine on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 2:50:19 AM
I was quoting FDR's words, paraphrased that is... by shirley reese on Thursday, May 21, 2009 at 5:30:19 PM