Share on Google Plus
  3
Share on Twitter
  11
Share on Facebook
  16
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  1
31 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Constitution? What Constitution? Paul Ryan Refuses to Provide for the General Welfare

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 1/5/13

opednews.com

Cross-posted from The Nation


When the members of the 113th Congress of the United States took office this week, they swore an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic," and to "bear true faith and allegiance to the same."

The preamble to that Constitution establishes its purpose: "To form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity..."

The Constitution rests a special responsibility in this regard on the legislative branch of the federal government, declaring that the Congress shall use its powers to tax and spend to "provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States."

A good debate can be had about the precise meaning of "the general Welfare of the United States." The founders had that debate -- with James Madison and Alexander Hamilton differing vociferously -- and it has continued in the Congress and the courts to this day.

But even in the 1790s, there was broad understanding that providing for the "general welfare" involved the taking of steps to protect the people from "misfortune, sickness, calamity or evil" -- and to help them respond to such circumstances. Then, as now, "calamity" was understood to involve epic storms, floods and natural disasters.

Click Here to Read Whole Article

 

John Nichols, a pioneering political blogger, has written the Online Beat since 1999. His posts have been circulated internationally, quoted in numerous books and mentioned in debates on the floor of Congress.

Nichols writes about politics (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Paul Ryan? Seriously?

Scott Walker's Austerity Agenda Yields 'Worst Job Losses in US'

The Koch Brothers, ALEC and the Savage Assault on Democracy

How Socialists Built America

Bernie Sanders: "I Am Prepared to Run for President of the United States"

Mitt Romney Debate "Win" Gives Obama a Winning Issue

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The telling part of this article is that there is ... by Nelson Robison on Sunday, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:18:27 PM
disastrous it would have been if this Ryan creep h... by Archie on Monday, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:20:57 PM