Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   11 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Congressional oversight of the NSA is a joke. I should know, I'm in Congress

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 6   Must Read 5   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 10/25/13

Source: The Guardian

I've learned far more about government spying on citizens from the media than I have from official intelligence briefings

U.S. National Security Agency Director General Keith Alexander (L), Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Deputy Attorney General James Cole (R) are sworn in to testify at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act legislation on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 26, 2013.
US National Security Agency Director General Keith Alexander (L), Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Deputy Attorney General James Cole (R) are sworn in to testify at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act legislation on Capitol Hill in Washington, 26 September 2013. Photograph: JASON REED/REUTERS

In the 1970s, Congressman Otis Pike of New York chaired a special congressional committee to investigate abuses by the American so-called "intelligence community" -- the spies. After the investigation, Pike commented:

"It took this investigation to convince me that I had always been told lies, to make me realize that I was tired of being told lies."

I'm tired of the spies telling lies, too.

Pike's investigation initiated one of the first congressional oversight debates for the vast and hidden collective of espionage agencies, including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the National Security Agency (NSA). Before the Pike Commission, Congress was kept in the dark about them -- a tactic designed to thwart congressional deterrence of the sometimes illegal and often shocking activities carried out by the "intelligence community." Today, we are seeing a repeat of this professional voyeurism by our nation's spies, on an unprecedented and pervasive scale.

Recently, the US House of Representatives voted on an amendment -- offered by Representatives Justin Amash and John Conyers -- that would have curbed the NSA's omnipresent and inescapable tactics. Despite furious lobbying by the intelligence industrial complex and its allies, and four hours of frantic and overwrought briefings by the NSA's General Keith Alexander, 205 of 422 Representatives voted for the amendment.

Though the amendment barely failed, the vote signaled a clear message to the NSA: we do not trust you. The vote also conveyed another, more subtle message: members of Congress do not trust that the House Intelligence Committee is providing the necessary oversight. On the contrary, "oversight" has become "overlook."



Despite being a member of Congress possessing security clearance, I've learned far more about government spying on me and my fellow citizens from reading media reports than I have from "intelligence" briefings. If the vote on the Amash-Conyers amendment is any indication, my colleagues feel the same way. In fact, one long-serving conservative Republican told me that he doesn't attend such briefings anymore, because, "they always lie."

Many of us worry that Congressional Intelligence Committees are more loyal to the "intelligence community" -- that they are tasked with policing -- than to the Constitution. And the House Intelligence Committee isn't doing anything to assuage our concerns.

I've requested classified information, and further meetings with NSA officials. The House Intelligence Committee has refused to provide either. Supporters of the NSA's vast ubiquitous domestic spying operation assure the public that members of Congress can be briefed on these activities whenever they want. Senator Saxby Chambliss says all a member of Congress needs to do is ask for information, and he'll get it. Well I did ask, and the House Intelligence Committee said "no," repeatedly. And virtually every other member not on the Intelligence Committee gets the same treatment.

Recently, a member of the House Intelligence Committee was asked at a town hall meeting, by his constituents, why my requests for more information about these programs were being denied. This member argued that I don't have the necessary level of clearance  to obtain access for classified information. That doesn't make any sense; every member is given the same level of clearance. 

There is no legal justification for imparting secret knowledge about the NSA's domestic surveillance activities only to the 20 members of the House Intelligence Committee. Moreover, how can the remaining 415 of us do our job properly, when we're kept in the dark -- or worse -- misinformed?

Edward Snowden's revelations demonstrate that the members of Congress, who are asked to authorize these programs, are not privy to the same information provided to junior analysts at the NSA, and even private contractors who sell services to foreign governments. The only time that these intelligence committees disclose classified information to us, your elected representatives, is when it serves the purposes of the "intelligence community."

As the country continues to debate the supposed benefits of wall-to-wall spying programs on each and every American, without probable cause, the spies, "intelligence community" and Congressional Intelligence Committees have a choice: will they begin sharing comprehensive information about these activities, so that elected public officials have the opportunity to make informed decisions about whether such universal snooping is necessary, or constitutional?

Or will they continue to obstruct our efforts to understand these programs, and force us to rely on information provided by whistleblowers who undertake substantial risks to disseminate this information about violations of our freedom in an increasingly hostile environment? And why do Generals Alexander and Clapper remain in office, when all the evidence points to them committing the felony of lying to Congress and the American people?

Representative Pike would probably say that rank-and-file representatives will never get the information we need from the House Intelligence Committee, because the spying industrial complex answers only to itself. After all, Pike, and many of the members of his special congressional committee, voted against forming it. As it is now constituted, the House Intelligence Committee will never decry, deny, or defy any spy. They see eye-to-eye, so they turn a blind eye. Which means that if we rely on them, we can kiss our liberty good-bye.

 

Democratic Congressman from Florida's 8th congressional district.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How To Destroy An Entire Country

You Can't Do Nothing About Nothing

Why Boehner Cries

Rick Santorum Is Wrong

Should Only Seniors Be Allowed to Drive on the Highways? | Rep. Alan Grayson

This Literally Has Nothing to Do With Us

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Grayson is slick willie all over again. On the one... by Bill Johnson on Friday, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:01:13 PM
We need about another 100 Graysons on the job in t... by Tom Madison on Friday, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:29:03 PM
Really?  The 1st Amendment prohibits abridgin... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:21:18 AM
Not when it is classified information and protecte... by Bill Johnson on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:11:03 PM
When was the 1st Amendment amended to allow the go... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:02:55 PM
Where we seem to differ is on whether or not a gov... by Bill Johnson on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 4:00:09 PM
It took the power trippers in DC over 120 years an... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:38:09 PM
Thank you for clarifying these Constitutional issu... by Hubert Steed on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:55:18 PM
I do agree with you our government is keeping secr... by Bill Johnson on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:21:51 PM
I am watching the greatest assault on the Constitu... by Susan Lee Schwartz on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:47:42 PM
A general questions regarding the secrecy of infor... by Gail Harrison on Monday, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:52:23 PM