Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 2/17/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (15 comments)

Civilians Killed During Offensive in Afghanistan: Human Shields or Unfortunate Targets?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (65 fans)   -- Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

Flickr Photo by isafmedia

The narrative was set up from the beginning: the U.S.-NATO offensive in Marjah, Afghanistan would be one where not killing civilians would be at the forefront of conversation as major players in the conflict in Afghanistan, news organizations, and the people of Afghanistan and the world paid attention to the offensive. It was only a matter of time before military leaders and politicians began to trumpet a charge commonly heard from occupiers, that the enemy is using civilians as "human shields."

BBC News recently reported:

Gen Ghori, the senior commander for Afghan troops in the area, accused the Taliban of taking civilians hostage in Marjah and putting them in the line of fire.

"Especially in the south of Marjah, the enemy is fighting from compounds where soldiers can very clearly see women or children on the roof or in a second-floor or third-floor window," he is quoted by Associated Press as saying.

"They are trying to get us to fire on them and kill the civilians."

As a result, his forces were having to make the choice either not to return fire, he said, or to advance much more slowly in order to distinguish militants from civilians.

Forces that were going in to attack Marjah to root out Taliban they believed to be in the region warned civilians ahead of the invasion. NATO told civilians to keep their heads down. Fleeing the area was encouraged so forces could go in and wage a campaign that produced very few civilian casualties. This was all part of plans to ease public outcries against an occupation that many believe has been perpetrating indiscriminate attacks on civilians.

Despite calls encouraging civilians to leave, the Christian Science Monitor reported that not too many took "the hint."

The US-led force said Tuesday that fewer than 200 families -- around 1,200 people -- had left the town of Marjah and the surrounding area, which have a population of about 80,000. By Wednesday, the Associated Press reported another 100 families had left.

"Commanders in the area are reporting no significant increase in persons moving out of Nad-e Ali district in the last month," the US-led International Security Assistance Force said in a statement.

"Despite reports of large numbers of civilians fleeing the area, the facts on the ground do not support these assertions"...

..."The presence of a large number of civilians could make the operation much trickier and provide a test of the new coalition military doctrine of protecting the population. A large media contingent from around the world will accompany the troops, recording their progress.

An estimated 2,000 Taliban fighters are dug in and are believed to have planted roadside bombs and booby-trapped buildings. Residents said the insurgents had dug trenches in a traffic circle and mined the roads out of town. It may be too late for those who haven't escaped by now.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Kevin Gosztola is a writer and curator of Firedoglake's blog The Dissenter, a blog covering civil liberties in the age of technology. He is an editor for OpEdNews.com and a former intern and videographer for The Nation Magazine.And, he's the (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Whether the Taliban is or not doesn't matter by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:28:37 PM
The stories could be false, they could be true by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:04:41 PM
You're new to OEN by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:39:45 PM
Good thinkers? by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:25:37 PM
In appreciation by Peter Warner on Wednesday, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:34:22 PM
U.S. supports the Taliban by Peter Warner on Thursday, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:13:00 PM
Great, the US has taken over another Third World Town. by Allan Wayne on Wednesday, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:16:31 PM
Does it really matter? by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Thursday, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:55:37 AM
Rigght and Wrong by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:01:37 AM
Thank you Mark by Kevin Gosztola on Thursday, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:09:20 AM
A wonderful, yet unsustainable idealistic theory Kevin by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Thursday, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:24:01 AM
If you ask any person in America by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:38:14 AM
I most certainly do know the difference by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:32:38 AM
You're not biased? by Peter Warner on Thursday, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:17:28 PM
Stay or Go? by Kenneth Anderson on Thursday, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:07:37 AM