![]() |
By Abdus Sattar Ghazali (about the author) Page 1 of 2 page(s)
For OpEdNews: Abdus Sattar Ghazali - Writer Major
political parties of Pakistan have bitterly criticized the capitulating
conditions attached to the $4.5 billion US aid to Pakistan under the
Kerry-Lugar Bill passed by the Congress on September 4, 2009. Pakistan Muslim
League, a leading political party led by a former prime minister, Nawaz Sharif,
described the conditionalities similar to the notorious Pakistan-specific Pressler's amendment that
was used as an arms twisting tool by the US administration. The
Secretary of State has to issue a certificate on some sensitive subjects before
each installment of the US aid is to be disbursed. The Secretary of State,
under the direction of the president, has to certify to the appropriate
congressional committees that: According to
Shaheen Sehbai, editor of the leading Pakistani newspaper, The News, the
language of these conditions is different but in essence the US demands are the
same — give us AQ Khan, don't finger India, forget Kashmir, close the terror
shops of Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Muhammed and cooperate in the war on
terror on our terms. These
conditions implied that (1) Pakistan is supporting terrorist groups. (2) It is
involved in attacks on India. The Kerry-Lugar Bill particularly mentions
that attacks outside of Pakistan that
have been attributed to groups with Pakistani connections, including-- (i) the
suicide car bombing of the Indian embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, which killed
58 people on June 7, 2008; and (ii) the massacre of approximately 165 people in
Mumbai, India, including 6 United States citizens, in late November 2008. Clause
relating to the nuclear issue is aimed at allowing US investigators access to
individuals, such as AQ Khan, suspected of engaging in nuclear proliferation. It was reported in April 2008 that
the US State Department reportedly proposed to the Pakistan Government
to place one official permanently at the US embassy in Islamabad to deal with
Pakistan's nuclear issues, and also that the official would have direct access
to Pakistans National Command Authority (NCA) Secretariat. Clause
related to effective civilian control over the armed forces is self
explanatory. Apparently on behest of Washington in July 2008 Zardari government
abortively tried to put the powerful military-run spy agency, Inter Services
Intelligence (ISI), under civilian control. After the Mombai attacks of
December 2008, Senator Kerry called for putting the ISI under civilian control. It is all the
more intriguing that the conditionalities contain names of cities and towns
from where the Government of Pakistan is required to uproot the alleged
terrorist training camps. By doing so the US has formalized its allegations
about presence of so-called terrorist training camps and also that Pakistan's
soil is being used for such activities against neighboring countries including
India. Tellingly, one
billion dollars from the US aid to Pakistan is to be spent on upgrading US
Embassy and Consulates. It
was revealed in May that the White House has asked Congress for $736 million to
build a new U.S. embassy in Islamabad, along with permanent housing for U.S.
government civilians and new office space in the Pakistani capital. The scale
of the projects rivals the giant U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, which was completed
last year after construction delays at a cost of $740 million.
1. the Government of Pakistan is continuing to cooperate with the United States
in efforts to dismantle supplier networks relating to the acquisition of
nuclear weapons-related materials, such as providing relevant information from
or direct access to Pakistani nationals (Read Abdul Qadeer Khan) associated
with such networks;
2. the Government of Pakistan during the preceding fiscal year has demonstrated
a sustained commitment to and is making significant efforts towards combating
terrorist groups, consistent with the purposes of assistance described in
section 201, including taking into account the extent to which the Government
of Pakistan has made progress on matters such as:
(a) ceasing support, including by any elements within the Pakistan military or
its intelligence agency, to extremist and terrorist groups, particularly to any
group that has conducted attacks against United States or coalition forces in
Afghanistan, or against the territory or people of neighbouring countries (Read
India);
(b) preventing al-Qaeda, the Taliban and associated terrorist groups, such as
Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, from operating in the territory of
Pakistan, including carrying out cross-border attacks into neighbouring
countries, closing terrorist camps in the Fata, dismantling terrorist bases of
operations in other parts of the country, including Quetta and Muridke, and
taking action when provided with intelligence about high-level terrorist
targets; and
(c) strengthening counter-terrorism and anti-money laundering laws; and
(3) the security forces of Pakistan are not materially and substantially
subverting the political or judicial processes of Pakistan.
The more direct language against military intervention in political and
judicial processes has apparently been added by the US legislators on the
insistence of those Pakistanis who feel that the GHQ in Pindi is still creating
hurdles in allowing the PPP to run its government as it likes, specially after
the March 15 intervention to restore the judges, something which was taken as a
direct affront to President Zardari who had over-committed himself not to
restore the chief justice.
1 | 2
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 1 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |