Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   5 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

By Never Calling For Prosecution 'Left' Journalism Protects Investments In Continuous Genocide

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Jay Janson     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 8/16/15

Author 1723
Become a Fan
  (44 fans)
- Advertisement -
From PA001054 Village Under Bombingby Tommy Japan
PA001054 Village Under Bombingby Tommy Japan
(image by Jay Janson)
  License   DMCA

Thesis: Western society's progressive writers leave their readers with the impression that citizens of the US and allied nations will never be prosecuted for their mega massive crimes against humanity. Legal and moral implications and future ramifications are discussed and contrasted with ongoing litigation and warnings Martin Luther King gave.

For sixty-four of this writer's eighty-four years on Earth, 'left' journalists have been reporting how bad things are, detailing the slaughter of millions of innocent men, women and their children in their very own beloved formerly colonially occupied countries, often exposing inside stories of how US-NATO military invasions, bombings, occupations and CIA operations are planned, sold in media and executed.

Working as an archival research peoples historian for former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark, your author has undertaken a search back over the decades of such independent journalism of dissent, of criticism, and opposition to mainstream media promoted public approval and enthusiastic participation in these US-NATO military invasions, bombings, occupations and covert CIA operations, looking for any examples of journalists calling for prosecution under Nuremberg Principles Law, or noting the unlawfulness of the horrific events being reported, or referring to a need for justice for victims and survivors.

Your author would intensely appreciate readers letting him know of any passage in a published article or writing containing mention of one of the following:

'prosecutable crimes,'
'crimes against humanity,'
'reparations,' 'indemnity' or 'compensation'
- or even a sentence in which the word 'crime' was employed.

Initially, our only purpose was solely to be able to post quotes from commentaries, reports, histories or writings of well read independent journalists, authors and historians on the Ramsey Clark co-founded educational and stimulus website: Prosecute US Crimes Against Humanity Now Campaign[] which contains pertinent laws and a history of US crimes in nineteen countries. However, when a concerted effort was made to contact as many top journalists and historians as possible, the result was appalling. Half of those written to asking, 'why not call for prosecution of the many deadly horrors being reported as Realpolitik as unchallengeable as the weather,' did not reply, though they as colleagues had answered our emails in the past. The answers that did come back were striking,

"No, it would be like whistling in the dark."
"No I will not call for prosecution in my writing, pointless."
"Everyone knows where I stand."
(Many dissimulating.) "I support everything that Ramsey Clark does."
"Of course we all would like to see prosecution, but the courts are by our corporate rulers, so its impossible."

If I wrote back too many times insisting, "But doesn't one usually talk about something one would like to see happen," defensive or even angry replies would come back. In one instance, a colleague whose newsletters I never miss reading for their useful information, cussed me out for being obstinate, apparently exasperated by my insistence.

- Advertisement -

The next fruitless attempt included e-mailings and a few articles that quoted the US law stipulated definition of accessory after and/or before the fact being anyone assisting a felon or felons escape the law. The questions posed were, How could decades of reporting mayhem without mention that laws had been broken be anything else but helpful to fellow citizens engaged in profitable but deadly military action in innocent countries? Moreover, Why would pointing out such a devastatingly important truth and calling for justice ever be inappropriate? And in the case of millions of innocent people dead, dying or facing death, Is it not inhumane not to call for their killers arrest, indictment and punishment and for indemnity, compensation, and reparations for the millions of victims - even when the killers are the writers' own fellow citizens? Most importantly, What the hell else would stop the uninterrupted profitable genocide?

By way of contrast, the reader is invited to check out the website of a strong lawsuit against American citizens by an Iraqi mother that is being assisted by former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark at the lawsuits website below:

CLICK HERE to support Support first US-Iraqi lawsuit against Bush Administration about the Iraq War

If Mrs. Sundus Shaker Saleh is doing what is normal when a crime or crimes have been committed, then that would make the behavior of the independent progressive journalists of the West abnormal. Unless of course we hold it is normal for people not to want to see fellow countrymen and countrywomen go to prison.

Then to our amazement, we began to notice other critical information illogically missing throughout independent 'left' progressive journalism.

- Advertisement -

For first example, all our best minds are aware that the real power and source of this running genocide is a cabal of the wealthy elite running unregulated and widely free Western speculative interest banking led since World War Two from within the Wall Street establishment. Why then does the readership of anti-imperialist writers rarely hear much about this basic truth, but rather is constantly fed reports that credit bought and beholden US Presidents with power over what Ron Paul has called the illegal and unconstitutional use of America's Armed Forces and CIA. This deceptive focusing almost entirely on US Presidents, their appointed officials, members of Congress and important judges, all equally owned by financial-centers, simply plays along with what has already long been accomplished by criminal news, information and entertainment conglomerates maintaining cover and needed anonymity for those investing in knowingly criminal use of US Armed Forces and CIA.

Certainly the wisest of our writers and historians know, and have written, recognizing that those powerful investors running a many billion dollar kill and destroy "racket," like those which were exposed by famous Marine Major General Smedley Butler a century ago,[] would not entrust, or allow, the officials they had put in office to make decisions affecting their now become trillion dollar mega mammoth investments in profitable genocide. Noam Chomsky's Year 501 - the Conquest Continues, books by economics savvy Ed Herman and Michael Hudson, some fine writing by Finian Cunningham, and hard hitting commentary from Pepe Escobar and Paul Craig Roberts come to mind in this regard. So why should independent reporters and journalists be helping major media in this deception of a presidential power that has never existed. Even the last aristocratic wealthy insider US president of considerable influence, Franklin Roosevelt, confided his own limits of personal power in a now famous note to a close confident, "you and I know the government has been owned by a financial element in the centers of power since the days of Andrew Jackson.[FDR in a letter to Colonel House, 1932]

Also inexplicably absent from 'left' journalism is any suggestion of light at the end of the tunnel. Prevalent are doomsday scenarios. Even as homo sapiens prove a phenomenally deep capacity for intelligence and ingenuity putting a sophisticated camera and research device on a comet racing through outer space five hundred million miles away while mapping the human brain as the genome was mapped earlier, left journalism predicts unavoidable world wars to come shortly and ecological doom on its way without any corrective salvation to be foreseen.

No Justice No Hope Independent Journalism

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Worse than Committing Genocide is Refusing to Call for its Prosecution

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
Jay Janson is an archival research peoples historian activist, musician and writer; has lived and worked on all continents; articles on media published in China, Italy, UK, India and the US; now resides in NYC; First effort was a series of articles (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Tony Bennett Said About 9/11 Martin Luther King Jr. Would Have Also

Girlfriends? Petraeus Oversaw the Slaughter of Thousands and He Will Face Trial:

Demonic David Rockefeller Fiends Dulles Kissinger Brzezinski - Investor Wars Korea thru Syria

U.S. Threat to Atom Bomb North Korea Never Forgotten