Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 14 (14 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   8 comments, 2 series

Sci Tech

Brad Friedman Discusses Role of Diebold in Critical MA Special Election Tuesday

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 1/17/10

Become a Fan
  (71 fans)

Welcome to OpEdNews, Brad. There's a lot riding on Tuesday's special election in Massachusetts for Sen. Ted Kennedy's replacement. It should have been a cakewalk for Martha Coakley. What's going on?


I'll leave the politics of the matter to those more closely involved in them. It's gonna be a tough slog this year for all Democrats, particularly in light of their "play it safe" positions on well, just about everything.

That said, on the eve of the important special election where their "filibuster-proof" majority hangs in the balance, my top concern is to make sure that the candidate who receives the most votes actually gets to WIN this time, and that the citizens of both MA and the U.S., know for a fact that that person has actually won!

That won't be easy given the easily hacked voting machines, sold and serviced by a private company with a criminal background, that will be used in the race. I detail all of that, and why both Democrats and Republicans (and even Independents) should be VERY concerned, in my report this week on all of this at the right-leaning Gouverneur Times: http://tr.im/KvUb

To their credit, since the debacle that occurred last November in the NY-23 special election, the GT, even though they come from a decidedly right-wing angle, have figured out what I've been shouting about for years: Problems and concerns with electronic voting are not a matter of Right and Left as much as they are matter of right and wrong!

So, here we are again. Those of us who have been warning about our vulnerable elections for years have been efficiently marginalized and discounted. And, We the People are no better off than we were before. What can we citizens do at this late date, and is anyone listening out there?

Well, I'd object to your assertion that "We the People are no better off than we were before." Yes, we still face the same, uphill struggles to make folks understand what's going on and what's at stake here. But the Election Integrity movement, as rag tag and under-funded and without central leadership as we are, has had great victories against the Goliath of the e-voting industry (and its enablers in public office).

A defeatist attitude accomplishes little. So, we keep doing our best to fight the good fight, and get the word out however possible.

The fact that the Gouverneur Times -- an extremely Right-leaning news outlet in Upstate New York -- now cares about these issues, and is more than happy to have me write as a contributor there, indicates the word is getting out, and there are potentially a huge number of previously-clueless folks who may be waking up here.

As I've discussed long ago, there are no "silver bullets." The fight for democracy takes place one day at a time, and one fight at a time. But we ARE winning. As maddeningly slow as it often seems.

"What can we citizens do?" Keep fighting. Keep standing up to bullies, by sharing the independently verifiable facts with them. That's what you do, that's what I do, every day. That's all we can do. But it DOES make a difference, I believe.

We also have no control over whether anyone is listening or not. But what's become clear is that as soon as a particular candidate feels their ox has been gored (pun intended) or when there is a particularly close or dubious race, the "paper trail" (also, pun intended) that folks like you and I have left behind over so many years becomes suddenly *extremely* valuable. And so, we keep laying that trail.

Okay, let me rephrase that. What can we do about the sketchy but very important race that will be happening next Tuesday in Massachusetts?


Well, for a start, pass that article around! (Here's the URL again: http://tr.im/KvUb) since knowledge is always our best weapon and, given our lack of a corporate media voice, it WILL be up to "We, the People", one forwarded email, Tweet, DIGG, REDDIT, etc. at a time! Yes, that stuff does make a difference! I can tell you for a fact that when folks DIGG, REDDIT, Tweet stories at The BRAD BLOG, the readership rises dramatically and exponentially!

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.opednews.com/author/author79.html

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I have to admit that I probably would have voted f... by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:25:58 AM
Don't worry about voting machines. Don't worry abo... by Freddie Venezia on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:55:28 AM
Needless to say, if Diebold is counting the votes,... by Perry Logan on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:44:30 PM
thanks for writing.... by Joan Brunwasser on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:16:15 PM
Joan, thanks for bring Brad to OpEdNews. I discove... by Barbara Bellows-TerraNova on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:26:28 PM
i couldn't agree more. we shouldn't have to shudde... by Joan Brunwasser on Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:30:36 AM
You can accuse me of defeatism, but it is extremel... by Blaine Kinsey on Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:10:59 AM
Oh, come on now. How about we just dispense with a... by galen on Wednesday, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:17:27 AM