Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   News 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 12/15/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats

Bone Drug/Cancer News Highlights Women's Risky Therapy Choices

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (41 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Ladies, Pick Your Cancer

Many women receiving menopausal treatments today are too young to remember the old American folk tune, There Was An Old Lady Who Swallowed A Fly even though the song could be written about them.

The old lady, swallows a spider to catch the fly--then a bird to catch the spider, then a cat to catch the bird ad infinitum--until she is a walking Noah's Ark and iatrogenic casualty.

For forty years women obligingly swallowed the "fly" of Premarin, a horse urine menopause drug manufactured by Wyeth (now Pfizer) until it was revealed to increase endometrial cancer in the 1970s.

But not to worry. Wyeth had a better drug, the notorious Prempro ("spider") which, by adding a progestin to the estrogen, reduced endometrial cancer while increasing the risk of breast, ovarian and lung cancers. Oops. Nor did the original endometrial cancer risk completely go away.

Once Prempro was found to cause cancer and greater difficulty in reading mammograms that would detect same, Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators or SERMs surfaced (the "bird.")

SERMS like tamoxifen and Evista could help mammogram readability and prevent and/or treat breast cancer. Except they could contribute to endometrial and ovarian cancer. Anyone see where this is going?

No wonder when the news broke last week that bisphosphonate bone drugs like Fosamax and Boniva could reduce the incidence of breast cancer, women reacted with another American folkism: "Fool Me Twice, Shame on Me."

Sure the re-analysis of Women's Health Initiative data (WHI) by original author Rowan Chlebowski, MD, found women taking the bone drugs had 31 percent less invasive breast cancer after seven years. But the women on bisphosphonates in the paper presented at the Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium were also more likely to get noninvasive breast cancer called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

This is not the only example of the choice given to women of "trading" one cancer for another--some termed "good cancer"-- thanks to Wall Street wonder drugs that make women into lab animals. In fact within hours of the news, "Study Shows Merck's Fosamax May Fight Breast Cancer," appeared on Portfolio.com.

Hormone therapy's slight ability to reduce the risk of colon cancer is still marketed by Prempro makers, despite its increasing the risk of breast cancer, heart attacks, stroke and blood clots and contributing to asthma, lupus, scleroderma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, urinary incontinence, hearing loss, malignant melanoma and dementia according to journal articles.

In fact, a Wyeth-funded article in the current issue of the Journal of Women's Health discovers, when speculating about the cost of colon cancer that hormone patients might not incur, that hormone therapy is "cost effective." (Volume 18, Number 10) The Wyeth authors don't discuss how long women need to take hormones since the colon effect doesn't remain after hormone discontinuation and women are supposed to take hormones for the shortest amount of time and at the lowest dose possible.

Gad Rennert, MD of the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, Israel, a second presenter about bisphosphonate reduced breast cancer data in San Antonio last week, also touts hormone therapy's colon cancer benefit in the September 20, 2009 issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

And speaking of trade-offs, bisphosphonates, which stop bone loss by turning off the body's bone "remodeling," are associated with esophageal ulcers, bleeding and blockage. (Which is why women need to remain upright when taking them.)

Women taking bisphosphonates have twice the incidence of chronically irregular heartbeat according to two recent journal articles and can develop incapacitating musculoskeletal pain that leaves them bedridden or using wheelchairs according to the Los Angeles Times.

Bisphosphonate caused osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) or jaw bone death has surfaced as a new dental nightmare inspiring oral and maxillofacial surgical groups to recommend abstinence from the bone drugs before women undergo procedures and dentists to only work after signed waivers.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Martha Rosenberg is a health reporter and commentator whose work has appeared in Consumers Digest, the Boston Globe, San Francisco Chronicle, Chicago Tribune, New Orleans Times-Picayune, Los Angeles Times, Providence Journal and Newsday. She serves (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments