OpEdNews Op Eds

Bob Woodward questions Washington Post colleagues' handling of Snowden affair

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 11/22/13

- Advertisement -
Original published at RT


Larry King and Bob Woodward
(image by (Still from RT video))
  DMCA


Four decades after his reporting on the Watergate scandal reshaped investigative journalism, Bob Woodward of the Washington Post told Larry King this week that he'd have handled Edward Snowden's NSA scoop differently that those who first covered it.

Speaking to King for an episode of Politicking that aired Thursday evening on RT, Woodward said he would have preferred it if the source responsible for what has become perhaps the biggest story since Watergate would have approached him for assistance first, a remark that was immediately taken by many as a jab at The Guardian journalists who first detailed Snowden's National Security Agency leaks and their colleagues at, among other outlets, his own Washington Post.

"I wish he'd come to me instead of others, particularly The Guardian, and I would have said to him, 'let's not reveal who you are. Let's make you a protected source and give me time with this data and let's sort it out and present it in a coherent way,'" the 70-year-old Pulitzer Prize winner told King on the latest installment of his half-hour weekly news program. 

 

"I think people are confused about whether it's illegal, whether it's bad, whether it's bad policy,"  Woodward added during the episode. "So, what he did, and it's pretty clear he's held some things back, and he has said he didn't want to do anything that he deemed harmful. Now, you know, clearly broke the law, like Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon papers broke the law. And we're going to see. I wouldn't...I certainly wouldn't call him a hero."

- Advertisement -

Both the Post's Barton Gellman and former Guardian writer Glenn Greenwald -- two of the few journalists who have had access to the Snowden-supplied cache and have independently alerted the world to questionable operations conducted by the US intelligence agency revealed through the documents -- were quick to respond to Woodward's comment.

"I can't explain why Bob would insult the source who brought us this extraordinary story or the exemplary work of his colleagues in pursuing it," Gellman wrote in an email sent to Huffington Post on Thursday.

"The 'others' he dismissed include [The Washington Post's] Greg Miller, Julie Tate, Carol Leonnig, Ellen Nakashima, Craig Whitlock, Craig Timberg, Steven Rich and Ashkan Soltani -- all of whom are building on the Snowden archive with me to land scoop after scoop," Gellman added. "I won't get into why Snowden came to me or didn't come to Bob. But the idea of keeping Snowden anonymous, or of waiting for one 'coherent' story, suggests that Bob does not understand my source or the world he lived in."

On Thursday afternoon, Greenwald's Twitter account linked to a blog post hosted on the website of political commentator Heather Parton, who administers the Hullabaloo blog under the pseudonym "Digby."

                  

Glen Greenwald
(image by
Twitter)   DMCA
- Advertisement -

                 Glenn Greenwald
                 @ggreenwald

                 Bob Woodward laments: hmmm, why wouldn't a source like Snowden come to me? 
                 @Digby56 helps him understand http://digbysblog.blogspot.com.br/2013/11/qotd-b
                 2:52 PM - 21 Nov 2013

In the blog post, published a day earlier as news first circulated of Woodward's comments to King, Digby responded by citing previous reports that questioned the credibility of the long-time Post reporter with regards to sensitive information being leaked to the media. Digby quoted from a March 2013 Howard Kurtz essay published by CNN in which the host of the network's Reliable Sources program said Woodward admitted to being "part of the groupthink" that led to the build-up of the US invasion in Iraq.

"[Snowden] might have also been aware that while Woodward is perfectly willing to publish classified information, he limits it to a very special kind -- the kind the government wants you to see," wrote Digby, who then went on to quote Kurtz again wondering: "Did the Bush administration 'authorize' the leak of classified information to Bob Woodward? And did those leaks damage national security?"

Woodward, wrote the blogger, has "a reputation for protecting his sources -- but then his sources are all very high level government officials who are leaking to him to advance an agenda."

"It's unsurprising that someone in Snowden's position might not think Bob Woodward . . . would be the best person to approach," Digby added.

"Unlike Bob Woodward's DC sources, Edward Snowden didn't want to hide because he was and is proud of his choice," Greenwald opined from his Twitter account early Friday.
    

             

             Glenn Greenwald
             @ggreenwald

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://rt.com

rt.com is Russian television, which actually does a great job reporting on US news too.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Senators terrified with abuse of Patriot Act's secret laws

Pope Francis shakes up Vatican Bank supervisory board

DOJ wants Bush, senior cabinet members exempt from Iraq War trial

"World moving away from American financial hegemony"

Fracking Debris Considered Too Radioactive Even For Waste Site

"More destructive" than Stuxnet: Saudis and Israelis propose new malware against Iran nuclear program

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Bob Woodward wouldn't call Edward Snowden a hero, ... by Brian Lynch on Sunday, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:47:29 AM
Sour grapes and BS! Woodward and the Wapo, have no... by Paul Repstock on Sunday, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:25:37 AM
Woodward is an old CIA asset. He suspiciously had ... by Richard Matthews on Monday, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:48:20 AM