Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
26 comments

General News

Senators terrified with abuse of Patriot Act's secret laws

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 13   Valuable 6   News 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 3/18/12
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)

opednews.com

U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden (AFP Photo / Chip Somodevilla)
U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden (AFP Photo / Chip Somodevilla)

Horrified with the way the US government uses the Patriot Act against its own people, two senators have been trying to make these practices public for years. Tired of being ignored, they're now taking their fight against secret programs to public.

Two US senators wrote the attorney general of the United States this week, urging the federal government to give the American public evidence explaining how the Patriot Act has been interpreted since signed into law in 2001.

In a joint letter to Attorney General Eric Holder sent Thursday, Senators Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) and Mark Udall (D-Colorado) plead with the government to provide the American people with the facts behind what the Patriot Act can let America's top investigators do. The lawmakers, who have rallied for disclosure of these details for more than two years, say citizens would be "stunned" to learn what the government believes it can get away with under the law.

The controversial USA Patriot Act was hastily signed into legislation after the September 11 al-Qaeda attacks under the guise of a being a necessity for preventing future terrorist efforts, but for over a decade since the law has become notorious for its ability to stick federal eyes into seemingly every aspect of the American public in the name of counter-terrorism. Although the government has gone on the record to downplay the constitutionally-damning powers they are granted under the law, Senators Wyden and Udall say it is time that the feds fulfill the demands of millions of concerned Americans and discuss in detail what they can do under the act -- and what they've already done.

Wydell and Udall are specifically calling on Holder to provide information about how the government has interpreted Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which grants government officials with certain clearance to obtain "tangible things" deemed "relevant" to issues of terrorism. While that much is clear, write the senators, how the government goes about abiding by it "has been the subject of secret legal interpretations," which they add "are contained in classified opinions" that are not made available to much of Congress, let alone members of the general public.

"We believe most Americans would be stunned to learn the details of how these secret court opinions have interpreted Section 215," add the senators . "As we see it, there is now a significant gap between what most Americans think the law allows and what the government secretly claims the law allows. This is a problem, because it is impossible to have an informed public debate about what the law should say when they public doesn't know what its government thinks the law says."

The Justice Department has in their own defense said that disclosing details on certain interpretations could be detrimental to national security, an issue to which the senators acknowledge. "We believe that is entirely legitimate for government agencies to keep certain information secret," write the lawmakers.The argument being made by Wyden and Udall, however, is that the government is letting itself perceive the law in a way which not only are Americans completely oblivious to, but Americans are also under the false impression that matters are marvelously different.

"In a democratic society -- in which the government derives its powers from the consent of the people -- citizens rightly expect that their government will not arbitrarily keep information from them," reads the letter to Holder. "Americans expect their government to operate within the boundaries of publically-understood law, and as voters they have a need and a right to know how the law is being interpreted, so that they can ratify or reject decisions made on their behalf.

"Americans know that the government will sometimes conduct secret operations, but they don't think that government officials should be writing secret laws."

Wydell and Udall add that this is not something that they've only recently been pressing for. They claim to have gone after the president himself to declassify the interpretations of the Patriot Act so that Congress can consider discussions on Capitol Hill, but say that despite repeated attempts to appeal to Holder and others in the past, no leeway whatsoever has been accomplished. Now both the American Civil Liberties Union and The New York Times are trying to get the truth through filing Freedom of Information Act requests, but the feds are working overtime to make sure that the attempts at finding the facts are ignored.

The senators say they had a glimmer of hope in August 2009 when the Department of Justice and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence announced that they would begin a new processes for reviewing and releasing details of decisions from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court -- the court that interprets the Patriot Act -- but "two and a half years later, however, this 'process' had produced literally zero results."

 

http://rt.com

rt.com is Russian television, which actually does a great job reporting on US news too.
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Senators terrified with abuse of Patriot Act's secret laws

Pope Francis shakes up Vatican Bank supervisory board

DOJ wants Bush, senior cabinet members exempt from Iraq War trial

Fracking Debris Considered Too Radioactive Even For Waste Site

"More destructive" than Stuxnet: Saudis and Israelis propose new malware against Iran nuclear program

Attorney General Holder under investigation on perjury suspicions

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
21 people are discussing this page, with 26 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

If I remember correctly all the senators voted for... by liberalsrock on Sunday, Mar 18, 2012 at 1:00:09 PM
...but I would still tend to agree that this is mo... by Joe Reeser on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:06:06 PM
The former NSA official held his thumb and forefin... by 911TRUTH on Sunday, Mar 18, 2012 at 1:03:17 PM
should. I see that Senator Orrin Hatch is happily ... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:26:31 AM
Are we really to believe that these so-called sena... by Joan Mootry on Sunday, Mar 18, 2012 at 4:47:45 PM
I agree with everything you're saying - and you're... by Jack Flanders on Sunday, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:40:56 PM
The Congress voted for the Patriot Act.   And... by Patricia Gray on Sunday, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:27:34 PM
Voting them all out of office won't do any good. U... by Arlen Grossman on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:59:07 PM
Well, they've built the FEMA camps, now they are f... by Guitar Chris on Sunday, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:30:51 PM
"While that much is clear, write the senators, how... by Rixar13 on Sunday, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:42:57 PM
"While that much is clear, write the senators, how... by Rixar13 on Sunday, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:43:18 PM
senators terrified but doing nothing to change&nbs... by Edward Mayes on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:03:48 AM
I'm sure that Eric Holder between obstructing just... by Steven G. Erickson on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:22:58 AM
About 4 years ago, I visited Sen. Wyden's office t... by Bill Dugan on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:20:04 AM
if I were at your party drinking wine and you bega... by Elizabeth Hanson on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:20:44 AM
When one creates a security agency that agency wil... by Philip Pease on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:57:10 AM
Except for the fact that 9/11 was a false flag eve... by 911TRUTH on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:43:38 AM
Don't bet on that.  The USSR ruled with an ir... by Sister Begonia on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:30:11 PM
Executive Order -- National Defense Resources... by Sister Begonia on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:18:19 PM
By claiming the general strike interferes w/ milit... by Laura Stein on Thursday, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:45:46 PM
You'll love this if you love the Patriot... by Robert Bostick on Tuesday, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:12:14 AM
Just for the record, RT.com is not 'Russian TV', (... by Mark Harris on Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:29:31 PM
Can anybody say "Star Chamber"!... by Peter Hockley on Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:30:33 PM
Senators Wyden and Udall don't have to worry about... by ChicagoNetTech on Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:45:35 PM
"because the NSA is about to shred the Constitutio... by Laura Stein on Thursday, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:31:15 PM
especially when we're talking about Constitutional... by Laura Stein on Thursday, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:36:46 PM