Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats

OpEdNews Op Eds

Batting the Hornet's Nest

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Valuable 2   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 11/13/09
Become a Fan
  (38 fans)

Batting the Hornet's Nest

By Richard Girard

"For as the interposition of a rivulet, however small, will occasion the line of the phalanx to fluctuate, so any trifling disagreement will be the cause of seditions; but they will not so soon flow from anything else as from the disagreement between virtue and vice, and next to that between poverty and riches."

Aristotle (384--322 B.C.), Greek philosopher. Politics, book 5, chapter 3, section 1303b (c. 343 B.C.).

"The ordinary man is an anarchist. He wants to do as he likes. He may want his neighbour to be governed, but he himself doesn't want to be governed. He is mortally afraid of government officials and policemen."

George Bernard Shaw (1856--1950), Anglo-Irish playwright, critic. Speech, 11 April 1933, New York City.

Thank God for Alan Grayson!

I was beginning to think that the Democratic Party had lost all of its vital force, as well as its instinct for survival. I was afraid that it was suffering a terminal case of what I call "Sam Rayburn Disease," where "Go along to get along," had become the sole motivating force for the Democrats. I was deathly afraid that Ted Kennedy was the final dying ember of the party of the New Deal, the Great Society, the Voting Rights Act, the Civil Rights Act, and all of the other programs that had lifted our nation up from the plutocratic robber barons of the Twenties--whose machinations and excesses were at the heart of the Great Depression--to our first brief moments as a true representative democracy.

Nations need gadflies and iconoclasts as surely as you and I need exercise and mental challenges to stay healthy. We need them in our government, our media, and our lives in general. To quote the late, great Frank Zappa, "Progress is impossible without deviation from the norm."

We desperately need people who have the courage to shine the light into the darkest corners of our nation, while holding up a mirror to ourselves: so that we may recognize ourselves as we are, and not as the image of some self-deluded prodigy. Anyone who tries to tell you that to criticize our nation is wrong, that it does not need shaking up, and changed to fit evolving circumstances, is attempting to mislead or placate you. True patriots do not love their nation for what it is, but for what it potentially can be.

The free market aficionados who say that they do not need regulation of the financial system or their actions by state or Federal government, remind me of the bandidos in Treasure of the Sierra Madre who tell Humphrey Bogart "Badges. We don't need no stinking badges," then kill him.

Unfortunately, right now we have a whole bunch of bandidos in the Government of the United States, including a majority sitting as members of our Supreme Court.

The attempt by Senator Leahy of Vermont to remove the anti-trust exemption from the insurance companies is a good start. Cartels and trusts such as those the insurance companies enjoy are at the heart of monopolistic practices, including price fixing and collusion.

I think we should further attack corporate power, especially regarding campaign finance laws.

The Supreme Court is going to decide on several cases involving campaign finance law, including the McCain-Feingold Act which limits in-kind spending (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission). With a strong pro-business majority, we can be certain that the Roberts Court will strike down as much of that law as it thinks it can get away with.

I believe that Congress should use its power under Article III, Section 2, paragraph 2 of the Constitution and remove the Supreme Court's authority to look at the constitutionality of campaign finance reform laws, specifically with regards to artificial persons, as applied to the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. I would like to suggest to Congressman Grayson that he take the lead by introducing such a bill in the House, with Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont introducing an identical bill in the Senate.

Next Page  1  |  2


Richard Girard is an increasingly radical representative of the disabled and disenfranchised members of America's downtrodden, who suffers from bipolar disorder (type II or type III, the professionals do not agree). He has put together a team to (more...)
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Great Enemy of the Truth

Into a Thousand Pieces

The Communist Takeover of America

Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense

Social Capitalism

The Judgment of History; Or Why the Breaking of the Oligarchs Avenges President Kennedy's Assassination--Part One


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I suspect you have a typo in your reference becaus... by Starbuck on Monday, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:30:29 PM
I would restrict them all, and limit funding of el... by Richard Girard on Tuesday, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:26:26 PM