Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   9 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   Valuable 4  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 6/2/11

Become a Fan
  (38 fans)

Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense (Evil to Him That Thinks It)

By Richard Girard

"Self-interest, or rather self-love, or egoism, has been more plausibly substituted as the basis of morality. But I consider our relations with others as constituting the boundaries of morality. With ourselves, we stand on the ground of identity, not of relation, which last, requiring two subjects, excludes self-love confined to a single one. To ourselves, in strict language, we can owe no duties, obligation requiring also two parties. Self-love, therefore, is no part of morality. Indeed, it is exactly its counterpart." --Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Law, 1814. Complete Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Memorial Edition; volume14: page 140 ; 1904.

There are times when I get hold of a subject, and I simply cannot let go of it until I have said everything I can think of to say on the subject. And Ayn Rand's quasi-philosophy of Objectivism definitely has me in bulldog with bone mode.

The quote from Thomas Jefferson above is my starting point today. Our nation's third President was a true polymath: an expert on broad areas of knowledge from history to economics to botany to law to agronomy to politics to literature. JFK was correct when he stated at a dinner for Nobel laureates that it was the greatest collection of minds the White House had seen since Thomas Jefferson had dined alone. When Jefferson donated his library to the Library of Congress to help replace the one burned by the British in 1814, there were some 6200 volumes in that collection. And he had read them all.

"But I consider our relations with others as constituting the boundaries of morality."

Let us examine this statement and its implications.

Do human beings who are on their own have any rational system of morality to practice or maintain?

The answer to this is quite simple: no.

If they are completely on their own, human beings have one overriding purpose: survival. This is driven (according to neuroscience) by the reptilian amygdala, not by the rational forebrain. A single human being (for example, stranded on a desert isle) is not a human being: he is an animal, seeking to survive, by any means necessary.

If it is between two people, one hopes that the system is not of one dominating the other, but rather a system of equals with defined if not identical roles and responsibilities, where fairness and individual ability are taken into account. If it is a system of involuntary dominance, there is a very good chance that the dominating individual will wake up one morning alone or dead, since such relationships have a tendency to become abusive, or that in an act of anger the dominant will kill the submissive partner. Either way, we can see that in a system of dominance, what Jefferson would say today is that the boundaries of morality are broken, and this may have been where his own guilty conscience was at work at the thought of holding slaves. In Jefferson's defense, he never had the money to free his slaves, even his own illegitimate children. Under the laws of the Commonwealth, his former slaves would have had to leave Virginia immediately, as a condition of their manumission, or face torture as well as once again become slaves. Jefferson, a brilliant politician with a poor head for business, never had the money to pay for the resettlement of his freed slaves, as his fellow slave owner George Washington did in his will. Without resettlement money, any slave he freed would almost certainly have ended up slaves in another state sooner rather than later.

When we consider groups of three or more people, some sort of moral system becomes increasingly necessary (even inevitable), in direct proportion to the total number of people involved. The more rationally based and flexible a system is, and the more equitably that it is created, maintained, and enforced, the more likely that system will survive in the long term.

"Egoism, in a broader sense, has been... presented as the source of moral action. It has been said that we feed the hungry, clothe the naked, bind up the wounds of the man beaten by thieves, pour oil and wine into them, set him on our own beast and bring him to the inn, because we receive ourselves pleasure from these acts... These good acts give us pleasure, but how happens it that they give us pleasure? Because nature hath implanted in our breasts a love of others, a sense of duty to them, a moral instinct, in short, which prompts us irresistibly to feel and to succor their distresses... The Creator would indeed have been a bungling artist had he intended man for a social animal without planting in him social dispositions. It is true they are not planted in every man, because there is no rule without exceptions; but it is false reasoning which converts exceptions into the general rule." --Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Law, 1814. The Complete Writings of Thomas Jefferson; Memorial Edition; volume 14: page 141; 1904.

Scientists are just beginning to discover the inherent streak of democracy in many animals, carnivores and herbivores, which exist in a herd or pack structure. Historians and anthropologists are rediscovering the underlying democratic institutions of peoples as diverse as the Iroquois Confederacy, the Celts of pre-Roman Britain, and the Saxons.

Thom Hartmann in his book What Would Jefferson Do? looks at the Iroquois as well as the Celts of pre-Roman Britain and the Saxons of early England, and their democratic institutions, in Chapter 3, "People and Events That Influenced America's Founders." Using the Roman historian Tacitus, and the Eighteenth Century English historian Paul de Rapin Thoyras (who both Jefferson and Adams agreed was the source of English history most free of Royalist taint); Hartmann examines the balance of power that existed between the people and their leaders among the Celts and Saxons. He also looks at the influence the democratic Iroquois Confederacy had on our Constitution, most especially in the creation of three separate but equal branches of government.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4


Richard Girard is an increasingly radical representative of the disabled and disenfranchised members of America's downtrodden, who suffers from bipolar disorder (type II or type III, the professionals do not agree). He has put together a team to (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Great Enemy of the Truth

Into a Thousand Pieces

The Communist Takeover of America

Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense

Social Capitalism

The Judgment of History; Or Why the Breaking of the Oligarchs Avenges President Kennedy's Assassination--Part One


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

from the motto of England's oldest order of K... by Richard Girard on Thursday, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:38:52 AM
Outstanding piece, Richard. There is much in tradi... by Ned Lud on Friday, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:25:09 AM
That is as fine a compliment as I've ever received... by Richard Girard on Friday, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:25:30 PM
I think morality is based on maintaining happiness... by Kevin Cody on Thursday, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:25:20 PM
I do know (and agree with) Carl Jung who stated th... by Richard Girard on Thursday, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:45:58 PM
"Fat Bottomed Churls Make The World Go Down"The fa... by Howlin' Sandy on Thursday, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:17:37 PM
Of altruism." It is a moral system which holds th... by richard hughes on Friday, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:12:32 PM
Democracy in a republic based on capitalism is "of... by Harold Hellickson on Saturday, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:44:39 PM
That is exactly what the Michigan Supreme Court sa... by Richard Girard on Saturday, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:44:51 PM