An Oxymoron: "Marxist Communism"

   
Patriarchy = top down "government" by men, dictionary definition of  "government" .."a branch or service of the supreme authority of a state or nation, taken as representing the whole"

A "service" of the state "representing the whole"?  Not these days!

To serve and represent the whole of humankind first of all both sexes would have to be represented. If it is not in the nature of women to be competitive enough to grasp and hold political power at the top, ( and I do not think women are built for such endeavor ), then there would have to be a way for women to hold power at the bottom of society. We would have to have a  bottom-up process of governmental representation to complement our current top-down system of  government.

  For a top down patriarchal government to force into existence a true  communism is a ridiculous idea. Marx was not thinking straight. Communism is a voluntary group cooperation between individuals( usually involving communal property ). Enforcing voluntary cooperation is an oxymoron. Slow careful bottom-up highly spontaneous voluntary cooperative is needed. No totalitarian government could possibly force this into existence. Single-person true self-representative actions of each individual in true cooperative harmony and consensus with other individuals is needed. It is a bottom-up process. It is a more feminine than masculine process. A highly competitive top down political process is more masculine. Only a society that has a careful bottom- up egalitarian political process matching in strength the top down vertical political process can hope to represent the two sexes of the human species and thus guarantee real representative government of by and for the people.

In  Nature we see periodic inversionings. At the bottom we see space and  time in their Einsteinian inversionings. Later and higher in evolution we see more inversionings taking place. We see many sperm swimming quickly upstream to find one largely immobile egg, The sperm, some think, help each other and one sperm wins the egg. Later we see many male deer fighting for a  whole herd of females and one of them wins the whole herd.  ( We see a  "herd" of  sperm going for one egg, and one male deer winning a herd of female deer. )

With apes and humans we see tribes. Herds and tribes are not at all the same thing. In some tribes the top female ( until we see tribes there was no such thing as a "top female" ) chooses which male wins and he becomes the favorite of all the females. ( We see a female choosing a mate and he being  tribal favorite instead  of males fighting and thereby winning a herd of females ) With some apes and early humans ( at one stage of tribal/social evolution ) the head female chose the head male and he mated with  many of the tribal females.

And later in human evolution the matriarchal tribe inverted to become a patriarchal tribe. The tribe then morphed to be an empire or mega-tribe. The male was once again on top. The human female, once possible head of a tribe, lost that position to become a lone female in a patriarchal nuclear family. But, as this is a universe of periodic inversionings, it should be easy to see that this pattern would not hold forever.

When the patriarchal/agricultural/civil revolution inverted and became the Industrial revolution patriarchy was doomed to be overhauled. The feminine is due to come back to a much more prominent place in human evolution. A  more communistic matriarchal bottom up social organization must now form and  eventually mate with and merge with the more masculine political  structure or top down civil patriarchy.

There is a phrase "Ontogeny recapitulates Phelogeny". It means that the individual organism is a recapitulation or re-expression, of the species in its development. Or in other words the individual is a recapitulation of the group. Asexual reproduction does this completely. The daughter cells are a total genetic recapitulation of the mother cell split in two. Then sexual reproduction stood on the shoulders of asexual reproduction and that made it possible for a genetically unique individual to happen and at that point evolution took off to create a genetic Eden of an immense variety of species.

Cultural evolution has now made many patriarchal societies.There is little uniqueness between them. They are mostly carbon copies of each other with slightly different languages and customs and religions. They are at this point  inappropriate for further human evolution. For human evolution to take off it must be that a new fusion of the archetypal masculine energies of the cosmos and the archetypal feminine energies of the cosmos find new expression.

The "ontogeny" of a single human tribe must not be a recapitulation of the  "phelogeny" of the meg-tribe known as a patriarchal state. Each human tribe must break free of the old dying patriarchy by simply being engaged in an intensely person/transpersonal tribal life where that tribe sees itself as a unique global cell merging with other unique global cells to make a new organism i.e. sentient planet.  

 1  |  2